Assessing reflective thinking in solving design problems

The development of a questionnaire

Yi-Chun Hong, Ikseon Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reflection is a critical factor in solving design problems. Using good methods to observe designers' reflection is essential to inform the design of the learning environments that support the development of design problem-solving skills. In this study, we have developed and validated a novel self-reporting questionnaire as an efficient instrument to explore reflection, called Assessing Reflective Thinking in Solving Design Problems (ARTiD). This questionnaire has been developed based on the three-dimensional model for reflective thinking: the timing, the objects and the levels of reflection. A total of 294 undergraduate and graduate students in the fields of engineering, computer science and instructional design were recruited to participate in one of four iterative, formative tests through which reliability and validity analyses were performed to revise and confirm the questionnaire. Examples of participants' reflection patterns were demonstrated to show the practical value of this questionnaire. In conclusion, the final version of ARTiD was presented as a valid instrument to explore students' reflection for research and educational practice. In addition, we found that ARTiD can be used as an effective learning tool to guide student designers' reflections toward better learning and performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)848-863
Number of pages16
JournalBritish Journal of Educational Technology
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

questionnaire
student
research practice
educational practice
computer science
learning
learning environment
graduate
engineering
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Assessing reflective thinking in solving design problems : The development of a questionnaire. / Hong, Yi-Chun; Choi, Ikseon.

In: British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 46, No. 4, 01.07.2015, p. 848-863.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01c32d98e0454bfa9552cd836336abe5,
title = "Assessing reflective thinking in solving design problems: The development of a questionnaire",
abstract = "Reflection is a critical factor in solving design problems. Using good methods to observe designers' reflection is essential to inform the design of the learning environments that support the development of design problem-solving skills. In this study, we have developed and validated a novel self-reporting questionnaire as an efficient instrument to explore reflection, called Assessing Reflective Thinking in Solving Design Problems (ARTiD). This questionnaire has been developed based on the three-dimensional model for reflective thinking: the timing, the objects and the levels of reflection. A total of 294 undergraduate and graduate students in the fields of engineering, computer science and instructional design were recruited to participate in one of four iterative, formative tests through which reliability and validity analyses were performed to revise and confirm the questionnaire. Examples of participants' reflection patterns were demonstrated to show the practical value of this questionnaire. In conclusion, the final version of ARTiD was presented as a valid instrument to explore students' reflection for research and educational practice. In addition, we found that ARTiD can be used as an effective learning tool to guide student designers' reflections toward better learning and performance.",
author = "Yi-Chun Hong and Ikseon Choi",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bjet.12181",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "848--863",
journal = "British Journal of Educational Technology",
issn = "0007-1013",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing reflective thinking in solving design problems

T2 - The development of a questionnaire

AU - Hong, Yi-Chun

AU - Choi, Ikseon

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Reflection is a critical factor in solving design problems. Using good methods to observe designers' reflection is essential to inform the design of the learning environments that support the development of design problem-solving skills. In this study, we have developed and validated a novel self-reporting questionnaire as an efficient instrument to explore reflection, called Assessing Reflective Thinking in Solving Design Problems (ARTiD). This questionnaire has been developed based on the three-dimensional model for reflective thinking: the timing, the objects and the levels of reflection. A total of 294 undergraduate and graduate students in the fields of engineering, computer science and instructional design were recruited to participate in one of four iterative, formative tests through which reliability and validity analyses were performed to revise and confirm the questionnaire. Examples of participants' reflection patterns were demonstrated to show the practical value of this questionnaire. In conclusion, the final version of ARTiD was presented as a valid instrument to explore students' reflection for research and educational practice. In addition, we found that ARTiD can be used as an effective learning tool to guide student designers' reflections toward better learning and performance.

AB - Reflection is a critical factor in solving design problems. Using good methods to observe designers' reflection is essential to inform the design of the learning environments that support the development of design problem-solving skills. In this study, we have developed and validated a novel self-reporting questionnaire as an efficient instrument to explore reflection, called Assessing Reflective Thinking in Solving Design Problems (ARTiD). This questionnaire has been developed based on the three-dimensional model for reflective thinking: the timing, the objects and the levels of reflection. A total of 294 undergraduate and graduate students in the fields of engineering, computer science and instructional design were recruited to participate in one of four iterative, formative tests through which reliability and validity analyses were performed to revise and confirm the questionnaire. Examples of participants' reflection patterns were demonstrated to show the practical value of this questionnaire. In conclusion, the final version of ARTiD was presented as a valid instrument to explore students' reflection for research and educational practice. In addition, we found that ARTiD can be used as an effective learning tool to guide student designers' reflections toward better learning and performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930479839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930479839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bjet.12181

DO - 10.1111/bjet.12181

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 848

EP - 863

JO - British Journal of Educational Technology

JF - British Journal of Educational Technology

SN - 0007-1013

IS - 4

ER -