Assessing long-term nephron loss: Is it time to kick the CAN grading system?

Philip F. Halloran; Anthony J. Langone; J. Harold Helderman; Bruce Kaplan

doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00662.x

Assessing long-term nephron loss: Is it time to kick the CAN grading system?

Philip F. Halloran, Anthony J. Langone, J. Harold Helderman, Bruce Kaplan

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent efforts to use 'chronicity' scores based on scarring and atrophy as end points in the evaluation of drugs have revealed the problems with the existing 'CAN' score criteria and the need to evolve new criteria for evaluating transplants with scarring and atrophy.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1729-1730
Number of pages	2
Journal	American Journal of Transplantation
Volume	4
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00662.x
State	Published - Nov 2004
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Immunology and Allergy
Transplantation
Pharmacology (medical)

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00662.x

Cite this

@article{3bdb855615e1471eb6472e309ecfdafe,

title = "Assessing long-term nephron loss: Is it time to kick the CAN grading system?",

abstract = "Recent efforts to use 'chronicity' scores based on scarring and atrophy as end points in the evaluation of drugs have revealed the problems with the existing 'CAN' score criteria and the need to evolve new criteria for evaluating transplants with scarring and atrophy.",

author = "Halloran, {Philip F.} and Langone, {Anthony J.} and Helderman, {J. Harold} and Bruce Kaplan",

year = "2004",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00662.x",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "4",

pages = "1729--1730",

journal = "American Journal of Transplantation",

issn = "1600-6135",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing long-term nephron loss

T2 - Is it time to kick the CAN grading system?

AU - Halloran, Philip F.

AU - Langone, Anthony J.

AU - Helderman, J. Harold

AU - Kaplan, Bruce

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - Recent efforts to use 'chronicity' scores based on scarring and atrophy as end points in the evaluation of drugs have revealed the problems with the existing 'CAN' score criteria and the need to evolve new criteria for evaluating transplants with scarring and atrophy.

AB - Recent efforts to use 'chronicity' scores based on scarring and atrophy as end points in the evaluation of drugs have revealed the problems with the existing 'CAN' score criteria and the need to evolve new criteria for evaluating transplants with scarring and atrophy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7244242562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7244242562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00662.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00662.x

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15476465

AN - SCOPUS:7244242562

SN - 1600-6135

VL - 4

SP - 1729

EP - 1730

JO - American Journal of Transplantation

JF - American Journal of Transplantation

IS - 11

ER -

Assessing long-term nephron loss: Is it time to kick the CAN grading system?

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this