Assembly planning effectiveness using virtual reality

A. Banerjee, P. Banerjee, Nong Ye, F. Dech

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Planning the sequence of components (or parts) to be assembled during manufacturing is an important application problem for virtual environments for three main reasons. First, it is a difficult combinatorial optimization but a highly visual problem. Second, a majority of assembly operations in factories (with the exception of simple pick-and-place operations) are still performed manually, because they are difficult to automate. Hence, it is an important problem involving human-machine interface. Third, there are a number of assembly operations which require dextrous operator training. Hence, it is also an important training problem. Recent research suggests a promising approach for assembly determination based on using heuristic rules to generate soft constraints in addition to the regular hard quantitative constraints due to part geometry and topology. We believe that the emergence of virtual environments can enable us to systematically use these soft constraints, which previously has not been possible. In this paper, we report results of experiments involving fifteen voluntary participants using a nonvirtual reality (VR) environment involving blueprints, a nonimmersive desktop VR environment, and an immersive projection-based VR environment to first teach participants skills in handling soft and hard constraints for assembly planning through examples, and then to measure the effectiveness of their learnt skills in solving a different example problem. We have classified soft constraints as infeasibility constraints, reorientation constraints, difficulty constraints, instability constraints, and dissimilarity constraints. A significant observation is that the participants could, on average, perform the assembly operations in approximately half the time in the immersive and nonimmersive VR environments than in the traditional environment using blueprints.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)204-217
Number of pages14
JournalPresence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
Volume8
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Virtual reality
Planning
Blueprints
Combinatorial optimization
Industrial plants
Topology
Geometry
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Software

Cite this

Assembly planning effectiveness using virtual reality. / Banerjee, A.; Banerjee, P.; Ye, Nong; Dech, F.

In: Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Vol. 8, No. 2, 04.1999, p. 204-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Banerjee, A, Banerjee, P, Ye, N & Dech, F 1999, 'Assembly planning effectiveness using virtual reality', Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 204-217.
Banerjee, A. ; Banerjee, P. ; Ye, Nong ; Dech, F. / Assembly planning effectiveness using virtual reality. In: Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 1999 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 204-217.
@article{3613a272b26d4dc19684b480fa08af4e,
title = "Assembly planning effectiveness using virtual reality",
abstract = "Planning the sequence of components (or parts) to be assembled during manufacturing is an important application problem for virtual environments for three main reasons. First, it is a difficult combinatorial optimization but a highly visual problem. Second, a majority of assembly operations in factories (with the exception of simple pick-and-place operations) are still performed manually, because they are difficult to automate. Hence, it is an important problem involving human-machine interface. Third, there are a number of assembly operations which require dextrous operator training. Hence, it is also an important training problem. Recent research suggests a promising approach for assembly determination based on using heuristic rules to generate soft constraints in addition to the regular hard quantitative constraints due to part geometry and topology. We believe that the emergence of virtual environments can enable us to systematically use these soft constraints, which previously has not been possible. In this paper, we report results of experiments involving fifteen voluntary participants using a nonvirtual reality (VR) environment involving blueprints, a nonimmersive desktop VR environment, and an immersive projection-based VR environment to first teach participants skills in handling soft and hard constraints for assembly planning through examples, and then to measure the effectiveness of their learnt skills in solving a different example problem. We have classified soft constraints as infeasibility constraints, reorientation constraints, difficulty constraints, instability constraints, and dissimilarity constraints. A significant observation is that the participants could, on average, perform the assembly operations in approximately half the time in the immersive and nonimmersive VR environments than in the traditional environment using blueprints.",
author = "A. Banerjee and P. Banerjee and Nong Ye and F. Dech",
year = "1999",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "204--217",
journal = "Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments",
issn = "1054-7460",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assembly planning effectiveness using virtual reality

AU - Banerjee, A.

AU - Banerjee, P.

AU - Ye, Nong

AU - Dech, F.

PY - 1999/4

Y1 - 1999/4

N2 - Planning the sequence of components (or parts) to be assembled during manufacturing is an important application problem for virtual environments for three main reasons. First, it is a difficult combinatorial optimization but a highly visual problem. Second, a majority of assembly operations in factories (with the exception of simple pick-and-place operations) are still performed manually, because they are difficult to automate. Hence, it is an important problem involving human-machine interface. Third, there are a number of assembly operations which require dextrous operator training. Hence, it is also an important training problem. Recent research suggests a promising approach for assembly determination based on using heuristic rules to generate soft constraints in addition to the regular hard quantitative constraints due to part geometry and topology. We believe that the emergence of virtual environments can enable us to systematically use these soft constraints, which previously has not been possible. In this paper, we report results of experiments involving fifteen voluntary participants using a nonvirtual reality (VR) environment involving blueprints, a nonimmersive desktop VR environment, and an immersive projection-based VR environment to first teach participants skills in handling soft and hard constraints for assembly planning through examples, and then to measure the effectiveness of their learnt skills in solving a different example problem. We have classified soft constraints as infeasibility constraints, reorientation constraints, difficulty constraints, instability constraints, and dissimilarity constraints. A significant observation is that the participants could, on average, perform the assembly operations in approximately half the time in the immersive and nonimmersive VR environments than in the traditional environment using blueprints.

AB - Planning the sequence of components (or parts) to be assembled during manufacturing is an important application problem for virtual environments for three main reasons. First, it is a difficult combinatorial optimization but a highly visual problem. Second, a majority of assembly operations in factories (with the exception of simple pick-and-place operations) are still performed manually, because they are difficult to automate. Hence, it is an important problem involving human-machine interface. Third, there are a number of assembly operations which require dextrous operator training. Hence, it is also an important training problem. Recent research suggests a promising approach for assembly determination based on using heuristic rules to generate soft constraints in addition to the regular hard quantitative constraints due to part geometry and topology. We believe that the emergence of virtual environments can enable us to systematically use these soft constraints, which previously has not been possible. In this paper, we report results of experiments involving fifteen voluntary participants using a nonvirtual reality (VR) environment involving blueprints, a nonimmersive desktop VR environment, and an immersive projection-based VR environment to first teach participants skills in handling soft and hard constraints for assembly planning through examples, and then to measure the effectiveness of their learnt skills in solving a different example problem. We have classified soft constraints as infeasibility constraints, reorientation constraints, difficulty constraints, instability constraints, and dissimilarity constraints. A significant observation is that the participants could, on average, perform the assembly operations in approximately half the time in the immersive and nonimmersive VR environments than in the traditional environment using blueprints.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039446036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0039446036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0039446036

VL - 8

SP - 204

EP - 217

JO - Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

JF - Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

SN - 1054-7460

IS - 2

ER -