Asking new questions with old data: The centralized open-access rehabilitation database for stroke

Keith R. Lohse, Sydney Schaefer, Adam C. Raikes, Lara A. Boyd, Catherine E. Lang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This paper introduces a tool for streamlining data integration in rehabilitation science, the Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR), which allows researchers to quickly visualize relationships among variables, efficiently share data, generate hypotheses, and enhance clinical trial design. Methods: Bibliographic databases were searched according to inclusion criteria leaving 2,892 titles that were further screened to 514 manuscripts to be screened by full text, leaving 215 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the database (489 independent groups representing 12,847 patients). Demographic, methodological, and statistical data were extracted by independent coders and entered into SCOAR. Results: Trial data came from 114 locations in 27 different countries and represented patients with a wide range of ages, 62 year [41; 85] [shown as median (range)] and at various stages of recovery following their stroke, 141 days [1; 3372]. There was considerable variation in the dose of therapy that patients received, 20 h [0; 221], over interventions of different durations, 28 days [10; 365]. There was also a lack of common data elements (CDEs) across trials, but this lack of CDEs was most pronounced for baseline assessments of patient impairment and severity of stroke. Conclusion: Data integration across hundreds of RCTs allows clinicians and researchers to quickly visualize data from the history of the field and lays the foundation for making SCOAR a living database to which researchers can upload new data as trial results are published. SCOAR is a useful tool for clinicians and researchers that will facilitate data visualization, data sharing, the finding of relevant past studies, and the design of clinical trials by enabling more accurate and comprehensive power analyses. Furthermore, these data speak to the need for CDEs specific to stroke rehabilitation in randomized controlled trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number153
JournalFrontiers in Neurology
Volume7
Issue numberSEP
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 20 2016

Fingerprint

Databases
Research Personnel
Randomized Controlled Trials
Stroke
Clinical Trials
Bibliographic Databases
Manuscripts
Information Dissemination
Stroke Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
History
Demography
Common Data Elements
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Informatics
  • Rehabilitation
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Asking new questions with old data : The centralized open-access rehabilitation database for stroke. / Lohse, Keith R.; Schaefer, Sydney; Raikes, Adam C.; Boyd, Lara A.; Lang, Catherine E.

In: Frontiers in Neurology, Vol. 7, No. SEP, 153, 20.09.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lohse, Keith R. ; Schaefer, Sydney ; Raikes, Adam C. ; Boyd, Lara A. ; Lang, Catherine E. / Asking new questions with old data : The centralized open-access rehabilitation database for stroke. In: Frontiers in Neurology. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. SEP.
@article{bf4c5356a8c24305ad1cc47ff36b93d4,
title = "Asking new questions with old data: The centralized open-access rehabilitation database for stroke",
abstract = "Background: This paper introduces a tool for streamlining data integration in rehabilitation science, the Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR), which allows researchers to quickly visualize relationships among variables, efficiently share data, generate hypotheses, and enhance clinical trial design. Methods: Bibliographic databases were searched according to inclusion criteria leaving 2,892 titles that were further screened to 514 manuscripts to be screened by full text, leaving 215 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the database (489 independent groups representing 12,847 patients). Demographic, methodological, and statistical data were extracted by independent coders and entered into SCOAR. Results: Trial data came from 114 locations in 27 different countries and represented patients with a wide range of ages, 62 year [41; 85] [shown as median (range)] and at various stages of recovery following their stroke, 141 days [1; 3372]. There was considerable variation in the dose of therapy that patients received, 20 h [0; 221], over interventions of different durations, 28 days [10; 365]. There was also a lack of common data elements (CDEs) across trials, but this lack of CDEs was most pronounced for baseline assessments of patient impairment and severity of stroke. Conclusion: Data integration across hundreds of RCTs allows clinicians and researchers to quickly visualize data from the history of the field and lays the foundation for making SCOAR a living database to which researchers can upload new data as trial results are published. SCOAR is a useful tool for clinicians and researchers that will facilitate data visualization, data sharing, the finding of relevant past studies, and the design of clinical trials by enabling more accurate and comprehensive power analyses. Furthermore, these data speak to the need for CDEs specific to stroke rehabilitation in randomized controlled trials.",
keywords = "Informatics, Rehabilitation, Stroke",
author = "Lohse, {Keith R.} and Sydney Schaefer and Raikes, {Adam C.} and Boyd, {Lara A.} and Lang, {Catherine E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.3389/fneur.2016.00153",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Frontiers in Neurology",
issn = "1664-2295",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "SEP",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Asking new questions with old data

T2 - The centralized open-access rehabilitation database for stroke

AU - Lohse, Keith R.

AU - Schaefer, Sydney

AU - Raikes, Adam C.

AU - Boyd, Lara A.

AU - Lang, Catherine E.

PY - 2016/9/20

Y1 - 2016/9/20

N2 - Background: This paper introduces a tool for streamlining data integration in rehabilitation science, the Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR), which allows researchers to quickly visualize relationships among variables, efficiently share data, generate hypotheses, and enhance clinical trial design. Methods: Bibliographic databases were searched according to inclusion criteria leaving 2,892 titles that were further screened to 514 manuscripts to be screened by full text, leaving 215 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the database (489 independent groups representing 12,847 patients). Demographic, methodological, and statistical data were extracted by independent coders and entered into SCOAR. Results: Trial data came from 114 locations in 27 different countries and represented patients with a wide range of ages, 62 year [41; 85] [shown as median (range)] and at various stages of recovery following their stroke, 141 days [1; 3372]. There was considerable variation in the dose of therapy that patients received, 20 h [0; 221], over interventions of different durations, 28 days [10; 365]. There was also a lack of common data elements (CDEs) across trials, but this lack of CDEs was most pronounced for baseline assessments of patient impairment and severity of stroke. Conclusion: Data integration across hundreds of RCTs allows clinicians and researchers to quickly visualize data from the history of the field and lays the foundation for making SCOAR a living database to which researchers can upload new data as trial results are published. SCOAR is a useful tool for clinicians and researchers that will facilitate data visualization, data sharing, the finding of relevant past studies, and the design of clinical trials by enabling more accurate and comprehensive power analyses. Furthermore, these data speak to the need for CDEs specific to stroke rehabilitation in randomized controlled trials.

AB - Background: This paper introduces a tool for streamlining data integration in rehabilitation science, the Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR), which allows researchers to quickly visualize relationships among variables, efficiently share data, generate hypotheses, and enhance clinical trial design. Methods: Bibliographic databases were searched according to inclusion criteria leaving 2,892 titles that were further screened to 514 manuscripts to be screened by full text, leaving 215 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the database (489 independent groups representing 12,847 patients). Demographic, methodological, and statistical data were extracted by independent coders and entered into SCOAR. Results: Trial data came from 114 locations in 27 different countries and represented patients with a wide range of ages, 62 year [41; 85] [shown as median (range)] and at various stages of recovery following their stroke, 141 days [1; 3372]. There was considerable variation in the dose of therapy that patients received, 20 h [0; 221], over interventions of different durations, 28 days [10; 365]. There was also a lack of common data elements (CDEs) across trials, but this lack of CDEs was most pronounced for baseline assessments of patient impairment and severity of stroke. Conclusion: Data integration across hundreds of RCTs allows clinicians and researchers to quickly visualize data from the history of the field and lays the foundation for making SCOAR a living database to which researchers can upload new data as trial results are published. SCOAR is a useful tool for clinicians and researchers that will facilitate data visualization, data sharing, the finding of relevant past studies, and the design of clinical trials by enabling more accurate and comprehensive power analyses. Furthermore, these data speak to the need for CDEs specific to stroke rehabilitation in randomized controlled trials.

KW - Informatics

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992109549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992109549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fneur.2016.00153

DO - 10.3389/fneur.2016.00153

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84992109549

VL - 7

JO - Frontiers in Neurology

JF - Frontiers in Neurology

SN - 1664-2295

IS - SEP

M1 - 153

ER -