TY - JOUR
T1 - Arousal and Attraction
T2 - A Response-Facilitation Alternative to Misattribution and Negative-Reinforcement Models
AU - Allen, James B.
AU - Kenrick, Douglas
AU - Linder, Darwyn E.
AU - McCall, Michael A.
PY - 1989/8
Y1 - 1989/8
N2 - Previous explanations of arousal-attraction phenomena have focused on misattribution and reinforcement processes. Two studies were conducted to test an alternative response-facilitation explanation of these findings. In general, both studies followed previous methods, with the addition of conditions in which Ss attention was directed to the actual source of their arousal. Study 1 was based on the fear-arousal method used by Dutton and Aron (1974) and found enhanced attraction to a confederate in high-fear-arousal subjects. Contrary to the misattribution model, the focus-of-attention manipulation had no effect on attraction. Study 2 used a nonthreatening source of arousal (exercise) and also included a focus-of-attention manipulation. Contrary to the misattribution model, arousal facilitated sexual attraction even when subjects' attention was directed to the actual arousal source. Although the results of Study 1 are consistent with a negative-reinforcement model, the findings from Study 2, and from several other studies in the area, are not. The simple response-facilitation model best explains these results and provides a parsimonious alternative explanation for several other sets of data.
AB - Previous explanations of arousal-attraction phenomena have focused on misattribution and reinforcement processes. Two studies were conducted to test an alternative response-facilitation explanation of these findings. In general, both studies followed previous methods, with the addition of conditions in which Ss attention was directed to the actual source of their arousal. Study 1 was based on the fear-arousal method used by Dutton and Aron (1974) and found enhanced attraction to a confederate in high-fear-arousal subjects. Contrary to the misattribution model, the focus-of-attention manipulation had no effect on attraction. Study 2 used a nonthreatening source of arousal (exercise) and also included a focus-of-attention manipulation. Contrary to the misattribution model, arousal facilitated sexual attraction even when subjects' attention was directed to the actual arousal source. Although the results of Study 1 are consistent with a negative-reinforcement model, the findings from Study 2, and from several other studies in the area, are not. The simple response-facilitation model best explains these results and provides a parsimonious alternative explanation for several other sets of data.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141635005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141635005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.261
DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.261
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0141635005
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 57
SP - 261
EP - 270
JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
IS - 2
ER -