Arguing like a scientist

Engaging students in core scientific practices

Ying-Chih Chen, Joshua Steenhoek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Argumentation is now seen as a core practice for helping students engage with the construction and critique of scientific ideas and for making students scientifically literate. This article demonstrates a negotiation model to show how argumentation can be a vehicle to drive students to learn science's big ideas. The model has six phases: creating a testable question, conducting an investigation cooperatively, constructing an argument in groups, negotiating arguments publicly, consulting the experts, and writing and reflecting individually. A fifth-grade classroom example from a unit on the human body serves as an example to portray how argumentation can be integrated into science classrooms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-237
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Biology Teacher
Volume76
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

argumentation
students
Negotiating
Students
classroom
student
management counsulting
science
Human Body
expert
Group

Keywords

  • argument-based inquiry
  • Argumentation
  • human body system
  • nature of science
  • negotiation model
  • scientific practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Cite this

Arguing like a scientist : Engaging students in core scientific practices. / Chen, Ying-Chih; Steenhoek, Joshua.

In: American Biology Teacher, Vol. 76, No. 4, 2014, p. 231-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b03591326408417b966a957df3a9c8ae,
title = "Arguing like a scientist: Engaging students in core scientific practices",
abstract = "Argumentation is now seen as a core practice for helping students engage with the construction and critique of scientific ideas and for making students scientifically literate. This article demonstrates a negotiation model to show how argumentation can be a vehicle to drive students to learn science's big ideas. The model has six phases: creating a testable question, conducting an investigation cooperatively, constructing an argument in groups, negotiating arguments publicly, consulting the experts, and writing and reflecting individually. A fifth-grade classroom example from a unit on the human body serves as an example to portray how argumentation can be integrated into science classrooms.",
keywords = "argument-based inquiry, Argumentation, human body system, nature of science, negotiation model, scientific practice",
author = "Ying-Chih Chen and Joshua Steenhoek",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1525/abt.2014.76.4.3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "231--237",
journal = "American Biology Teacher",
issn = "0002-7685",
publisher = "National Association of Biology Teachers, Inc",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arguing like a scientist

T2 - Engaging students in core scientific practices

AU - Chen, Ying-Chih

AU - Steenhoek, Joshua

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Argumentation is now seen as a core practice for helping students engage with the construction and critique of scientific ideas and for making students scientifically literate. This article demonstrates a negotiation model to show how argumentation can be a vehicle to drive students to learn science's big ideas. The model has six phases: creating a testable question, conducting an investigation cooperatively, constructing an argument in groups, negotiating arguments publicly, consulting the experts, and writing and reflecting individually. A fifth-grade classroom example from a unit on the human body serves as an example to portray how argumentation can be integrated into science classrooms.

AB - Argumentation is now seen as a core practice for helping students engage with the construction and critique of scientific ideas and for making students scientifically literate. This article demonstrates a negotiation model to show how argumentation can be a vehicle to drive students to learn science's big ideas. The model has six phases: creating a testable question, conducting an investigation cooperatively, constructing an argument in groups, negotiating arguments publicly, consulting the experts, and writing and reflecting individually. A fifth-grade classroom example from a unit on the human body serves as an example to portray how argumentation can be integrated into science classrooms.

KW - argument-based inquiry

KW - Argumentation

KW - human body system

KW - nature of science

KW - negotiation model

KW - scientific practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899016078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899016078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/abt.2014.76.4.3

DO - 10.1525/abt.2014.76.4.3

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 231

EP - 237

JO - American Biology Teacher

JF - American Biology Teacher

SN - 0002-7685

IS - 4

ER -