TY - JOUR
T1 - Are Whites and minorities more similar than different? Testing the cultural similarities hypothesis on psychopathology with a second-order meta-analysis
AU - Causadias, Jose
AU - Korous, Kevin M.
AU - Cahill, Karina M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Causadias José M. Cicchetti Dante Editors Causadias José M. Korous Kevin M. Cahill Karina M. Arizona State University This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. We thank Deborah Casper, Blair Johnson, Alan Sroufe, Emily Tanner-Smith, and Rebecca White for their feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript. Address correspondence and reprint requests to: José M. Causadias, T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics , Arizona State University , Cowden Family Resources Building , 850 South Cady Mall , Tempe , AZ 85281 ; E-mail: jose.causadias@asu.edu . 21 09 2018 12 2018 30 5
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright Cambridge University Press 2018.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - The cultural differences hypothesis is the assertion that there are large differences between Whites and racial/ethnic minorities in the United States, while there are small differences between- (e.g., African Americans and Latinos) and within- (e.g., Latinos: Mexican Americans and Cuban Americans) minority groups. Conversely, the cultural similarities hypothesis argues that there are small differences between Whites and minorities, and these differences are equal or smaller in magnitude than differences between and within minorities. In this study, we conducted a second-order meta-analysis focused on psychopathology, to (a) test these hypotheses by estimating the absolute average difference between Whites and minorities, as well as between and within minorities, on levels of psychopathology, and (b) determine if general and meta-analytic method moderators account for these differences. A systematic search in PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations identified 16 meta-analyses (13% unpublished) on 493 primary studies (N = 3,036,749). Differences between Whites and minorities (d+ = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [0.18, 0.28]), and between minorities (d+ = 0.30, 95% confidence interval [0.12, 0.48]) were small in magnitude. White-minority differences remained small across moderators. These findings support the cultural similarities hypothesis. We discuss their implications and future research directions.
AB - The cultural differences hypothesis is the assertion that there are large differences between Whites and racial/ethnic minorities in the United States, while there are small differences between- (e.g., African Americans and Latinos) and within- (e.g., Latinos: Mexican Americans and Cuban Americans) minority groups. Conversely, the cultural similarities hypothesis argues that there are small differences between Whites and minorities, and these differences are equal or smaller in magnitude than differences between and within minorities. In this study, we conducted a second-order meta-analysis focused on psychopathology, to (a) test these hypotheses by estimating the absolute average difference between Whites and minorities, as well as between and within minorities, on levels of psychopathology, and (b) determine if general and meta-analytic method moderators account for these differences. A systematic search in PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations identified 16 meta-analyses (13% unpublished) on 493 primary studies (N = 3,036,749). Differences between Whites and minorities (d+ = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [0.18, 0.28]), and between minorities (d+ = 0.30, 95% confidence interval [0.12, 0.48]) were small in magnitude. White-minority differences remained small across moderators. These findings support the cultural similarities hypothesis. We discuss their implications and future research directions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054996119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054996119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0954579418000895
DO - 10.1017/S0954579418000895
M3 - Article
C2 - 30238864
AN - SCOPUS:85054996119
SN - 0954-5794
VL - 30
SP - 2009
EP - 2027
JO - Development and psychopathology
JF - Development and psychopathology
IS - 5
ER -