Are we recovering? An evaluation of recovery criteria under the U.S. Endangered Species Act

Leah Gerber, Leila T. Hatch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1988, the Endangered Species Act was amended to require that recovery plans include objective criteria for delisting. In this paper, we characterized (1) temporal trends in the use of recovery criteria; (2) patterns of use for different categories of recovery criteria; (3) variability in the use of criteria by taxa and plan type; and (4) the relationship between categories of recovery criteria (population size, population trends, habitat fragmentation, demography, and legal/policy/other) and population status (i.e., declining, stable, improving). Of the 181 species (in 135 recovery plans) analyzed, 91% include at least one criterion, and 81% include at least one quantitative criterion. The total number of recovery criteria specified in plans increased significantly for species with plans approved after 1990. However, the number of recovery criteria characterized as having an unclear relationship to biological information also increased significantly for plans approved after 1990. Population size was the most quantitative and frequently used criterion, and there was a significant increase in the number of "population size" and "population trend" criteria with quantitative metrics after 1990. Species characterized as improving were more likely to include a very clear relationship to biological information. More recovery criteria are being developed for species in recent plans, and there is some evidence that species with improving status have a larger number of recovery criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)668-673
Number of pages6
JournalEcological Applications
Volume12
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2002

Fingerprint

Endangered Species Act
recovery plan
population size
habitat fragmentation
evaluation
demography
plan

Keywords

  • Conservation biology
  • Delisting
  • Endangered Species Act
  • Extinction
  • Population size
  • Quantitative vs. qualitative
  • Recovery criteria

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Are we recovering? An evaluation of recovery criteria under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. / Gerber, Leah; Hatch, Leila T.

In: Ecological Applications, Vol. 12, No. 3, 06.2002, p. 668-673.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{55cd74c1b5db46b19e61e88d0410847e,
title = "Are we recovering? An evaluation of recovery criteria under the U.S. Endangered Species Act",
abstract = "In 1988, the Endangered Species Act was amended to require that recovery plans include objective criteria for delisting. In this paper, we characterized (1) temporal trends in the use of recovery criteria; (2) patterns of use for different categories of recovery criteria; (3) variability in the use of criteria by taxa and plan type; and (4) the relationship between categories of recovery criteria (population size, population trends, habitat fragmentation, demography, and legal/policy/other) and population status (i.e., declining, stable, improving). Of the 181 species (in 135 recovery plans) analyzed, 91{\%} include at least one criterion, and 81{\%} include at least one quantitative criterion. The total number of recovery criteria specified in plans increased significantly for species with plans approved after 1990. However, the number of recovery criteria characterized as having an unclear relationship to biological information also increased significantly for plans approved after 1990. Population size was the most quantitative and frequently used criterion, and there was a significant increase in the number of {"}population size{"} and {"}population trend{"} criteria with quantitative metrics after 1990. Species characterized as improving were more likely to include a very clear relationship to biological information. More recovery criteria are being developed for species in recent plans, and there is some evidence that species with improving status have a larger number of recovery criteria.",
keywords = "Conservation biology, Delisting, Endangered Species Act, Extinction, Population size, Quantitative vs. qualitative, Recovery criteria",
author = "Leah Gerber and Hatch, {Leila T.}",
year = "2002",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "668--673",
journal = "Ecological Appplications",
issn = "1051-0761",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are we recovering? An evaluation of recovery criteria under the U.S. Endangered Species Act

AU - Gerber, Leah

AU - Hatch, Leila T.

PY - 2002/6

Y1 - 2002/6

N2 - In 1988, the Endangered Species Act was amended to require that recovery plans include objective criteria for delisting. In this paper, we characterized (1) temporal trends in the use of recovery criteria; (2) patterns of use for different categories of recovery criteria; (3) variability in the use of criteria by taxa and plan type; and (4) the relationship between categories of recovery criteria (population size, population trends, habitat fragmentation, demography, and legal/policy/other) and population status (i.e., declining, stable, improving). Of the 181 species (in 135 recovery plans) analyzed, 91% include at least one criterion, and 81% include at least one quantitative criterion. The total number of recovery criteria specified in plans increased significantly for species with plans approved after 1990. However, the number of recovery criteria characterized as having an unclear relationship to biological information also increased significantly for plans approved after 1990. Population size was the most quantitative and frequently used criterion, and there was a significant increase in the number of "population size" and "population trend" criteria with quantitative metrics after 1990. Species characterized as improving were more likely to include a very clear relationship to biological information. More recovery criteria are being developed for species in recent plans, and there is some evidence that species with improving status have a larger number of recovery criteria.

AB - In 1988, the Endangered Species Act was amended to require that recovery plans include objective criteria for delisting. In this paper, we characterized (1) temporal trends in the use of recovery criteria; (2) patterns of use for different categories of recovery criteria; (3) variability in the use of criteria by taxa and plan type; and (4) the relationship between categories of recovery criteria (population size, population trends, habitat fragmentation, demography, and legal/policy/other) and population status (i.e., declining, stable, improving). Of the 181 species (in 135 recovery plans) analyzed, 91% include at least one criterion, and 81% include at least one quantitative criterion. The total number of recovery criteria specified in plans increased significantly for species with plans approved after 1990. However, the number of recovery criteria characterized as having an unclear relationship to biological information also increased significantly for plans approved after 1990. Population size was the most quantitative and frequently used criterion, and there was a significant increase in the number of "population size" and "population trend" criteria with quantitative metrics after 1990. Species characterized as improving were more likely to include a very clear relationship to biological information. More recovery criteria are being developed for species in recent plans, and there is some evidence that species with improving status have a larger number of recovery criteria.

KW - Conservation biology

KW - Delisting

KW - Endangered Species Act

KW - Extinction

KW - Population size

KW - Quantitative vs. qualitative

KW - Recovery criteria

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036628159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036628159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036628159

VL - 12

SP - 668

EP - 673

JO - Ecological Appplications

JF - Ecological Appplications

SN - 1051-0761

IS - 3

ER -