Are the effects of juvenile offender stereotypes maximized or minimized by jury deliberation?

Tamara M. Haegerich, Jessica Salerno, Bette L. Bottoms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although trial judges admonish jurors to avoid being influenced by personal biases, social psychological theories suggest that stereotypes can influence jurors' case judgments. Further, such effects might be stronger or weaker after jury deliberation. In the current study, we examined the effect of stereotypes on pre- and postdeliberation case judgments in a mock trial. Jurors' stereotypes of juvenile offenders ("Wayward Youth" and "Superpredator") were measured and, in some conditions, activated by attorneys' arguments. Jurors provided pre- and postdeliberation case judgments. Results indicated that the more jurors held preexisting Superpredator stereotypes about juvenile offenders, the more likely they were to find the defendant guilty and the less likely they were to believe the defendant should have been tried in juvenile court. There was some evidence that the effects of preexisting biases were minimized after jury deliberation. We also found that jurors' juvenile offender stereotypes could be activated experimentally within the context of the trial. Compared to jurors in a control condition, jurors with an activated Superpredator stereotype were more likely to find the defendant guilty; jurors with an activated Wayward Youth stereotype were less likely to believe that the defendant should have been waived to criminal court. There was some evidence that experimentally activated biases were maximized after jury deliberation. We discuss theoretical explanations for why group deliberation might minimize the effect of jurors' preexisting stereotypes, but maximize the effect of stereotypes experimentally activated during trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-97
Number of pages17
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

juvenile offender
deliberation
stereotype
Psychological Theory
Lawyers
trend
juvenile court
psychological theory
evidence

Keywords

  • Court
  • Deliberation
  • Jury
  • Juvenile
  • Stereotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Are the effects of juvenile offender stereotypes maximized or minimized by jury deliberation? / Haegerich, Tamara M.; Salerno, Jessica; Bottoms, Bette L.

In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2013, p. 81-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bae45581c54d4065b8008b126f2d8da0,
title = "Are the effects of juvenile offender stereotypes maximized or minimized by jury deliberation?",
abstract = "Although trial judges admonish jurors to avoid being influenced by personal biases, social psychological theories suggest that stereotypes can influence jurors' case judgments. Further, such effects might be stronger or weaker after jury deliberation. In the current study, we examined the effect of stereotypes on pre- and postdeliberation case judgments in a mock trial. Jurors' stereotypes of juvenile offenders ({"}Wayward Youth{"} and {"}Superpredator{"}) were measured and, in some conditions, activated by attorneys' arguments. Jurors provided pre- and postdeliberation case judgments. Results indicated that the more jurors held preexisting Superpredator stereotypes about juvenile offenders, the more likely they were to find the defendant guilty and the less likely they were to believe the defendant should have been tried in juvenile court. There was some evidence that the effects of preexisting biases were minimized after jury deliberation. We also found that jurors' juvenile offender stereotypes could be activated experimentally within the context of the trial. Compared to jurors in a control condition, jurors with an activated Superpredator stereotype were more likely to find the defendant guilty; jurors with an activated Wayward Youth stereotype were less likely to believe that the defendant should have been waived to criminal court. There was some evidence that experimentally activated biases were maximized after jury deliberation. We discuss theoretical explanations for why group deliberation might minimize the effect of jurors' preexisting stereotypes, but maximize the effect of stereotypes experimentally activated during trial.",
keywords = "Court, Deliberation, Jury, Juvenile, Stereotype",
author = "Haegerich, {Tamara M.} and Jessica Salerno and Bottoms, {Bette L.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1037/a0027808",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "81--97",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are the effects of juvenile offender stereotypes maximized or minimized by jury deliberation?

AU - Haegerich, Tamara M.

AU - Salerno, Jessica

AU - Bottoms, Bette L.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Although trial judges admonish jurors to avoid being influenced by personal biases, social psychological theories suggest that stereotypes can influence jurors' case judgments. Further, such effects might be stronger or weaker after jury deliberation. In the current study, we examined the effect of stereotypes on pre- and postdeliberation case judgments in a mock trial. Jurors' stereotypes of juvenile offenders ("Wayward Youth" and "Superpredator") were measured and, in some conditions, activated by attorneys' arguments. Jurors provided pre- and postdeliberation case judgments. Results indicated that the more jurors held preexisting Superpredator stereotypes about juvenile offenders, the more likely they were to find the defendant guilty and the less likely they were to believe the defendant should have been tried in juvenile court. There was some evidence that the effects of preexisting biases were minimized after jury deliberation. We also found that jurors' juvenile offender stereotypes could be activated experimentally within the context of the trial. Compared to jurors in a control condition, jurors with an activated Superpredator stereotype were more likely to find the defendant guilty; jurors with an activated Wayward Youth stereotype were less likely to believe that the defendant should have been waived to criminal court. There was some evidence that experimentally activated biases were maximized after jury deliberation. We discuss theoretical explanations for why group deliberation might minimize the effect of jurors' preexisting stereotypes, but maximize the effect of stereotypes experimentally activated during trial.

AB - Although trial judges admonish jurors to avoid being influenced by personal biases, social psychological theories suggest that stereotypes can influence jurors' case judgments. Further, such effects might be stronger or weaker after jury deliberation. In the current study, we examined the effect of stereotypes on pre- and postdeliberation case judgments in a mock trial. Jurors' stereotypes of juvenile offenders ("Wayward Youth" and "Superpredator") were measured and, in some conditions, activated by attorneys' arguments. Jurors provided pre- and postdeliberation case judgments. Results indicated that the more jurors held preexisting Superpredator stereotypes about juvenile offenders, the more likely they were to find the defendant guilty and the less likely they were to believe the defendant should have been tried in juvenile court. There was some evidence that the effects of preexisting biases were minimized after jury deliberation. We also found that jurors' juvenile offender stereotypes could be activated experimentally within the context of the trial. Compared to jurors in a control condition, jurors with an activated Superpredator stereotype were more likely to find the defendant guilty; jurors with an activated Wayward Youth stereotype were less likely to believe that the defendant should have been waived to criminal court. There was some evidence that experimentally activated biases were maximized after jury deliberation. We discuss theoretical explanations for why group deliberation might minimize the effect of jurors' preexisting stereotypes, but maximize the effect of stereotypes experimentally activated during trial.

KW - Court

KW - Deliberation

KW - Jury

KW - Juvenile

KW - Stereotype

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883518762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883518762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0027808

DO - 10.1037/a0027808

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84883518762

VL - 19

SP - 81

EP - 97

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 1

ER -