Are "superdelegates" super?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Post-1968 changes in the Democratic party's nomination process resulted, by some accounts, in the selection of delegates who knew little about politics, cared little about winning, and were removed from the party following. One remedy for this situation was the reintroduction of party professionals into the process in the form of "superdelegates." Did this cure work? By examining the accuracy of superdelegates' perceptions of the party following's positions on issues compared with those of ordinary delegates, this paper addresses part of this question. Using data about the views of delegates to the 1988 national party conventions and the 1988 American National Election Study, I show that the fears about postreform delegates being more out of touch with the party following than "professionals" (i.e., superdelegates) are largely overstated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-92
Number of pages14
JournalPolitical Behavior
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1994

Fingerprint

election research
remedies
anxiety
politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Are "superdelegates" super? / Herrera, Richard.

In: Political Behavior, Vol. 16, No. 1, 03.1994, p. 79-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herrera, Richard. / Are "superdelegates" super?. In: Political Behavior. 1994 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 79-92.
@article{d34418cd7e5746249ec98a8a5e11ac5b,
title = "Are {"}superdelegates{"} super?",
abstract = "Post-1968 changes in the Democratic party's nomination process resulted, by some accounts, in the selection of delegates who knew little about politics, cared little about winning, and were removed from the party following. One remedy for this situation was the reintroduction of party professionals into the process in the form of {"}superdelegates.{"} Did this cure work? By examining the accuracy of superdelegates' perceptions of the party following's positions on issues compared with those of ordinary delegates, this paper addresses part of this question. Using data about the views of delegates to the 1988 national party conventions and the 1988 American National Election Study, I show that the fears about postreform delegates being more out of touch with the party following than {"}professionals{"} (i.e., superdelegates) are largely overstated.",
author = "Richard Herrera",
year = "1994",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/BF01541643",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "79--92",
journal = "Political Behavior",
issn = "0190-9320",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are "superdelegates" super?

AU - Herrera, Richard

PY - 1994/3

Y1 - 1994/3

N2 - Post-1968 changes in the Democratic party's nomination process resulted, by some accounts, in the selection of delegates who knew little about politics, cared little about winning, and were removed from the party following. One remedy for this situation was the reintroduction of party professionals into the process in the form of "superdelegates." Did this cure work? By examining the accuracy of superdelegates' perceptions of the party following's positions on issues compared with those of ordinary delegates, this paper addresses part of this question. Using data about the views of delegates to the 1988 national party conventions and the 1988 American National Election Study, I show that the fears about postreform delegates being more out of touch with the party following than "professionals" (i.e., superdelegates) are largely overstated.

AB - Post-1968 changes in the Democratic party's nomination process resulted, by some accounts, in the selection of delegates who knew little about politics, cared little about winning, and were removed from the party following. One remedy for this situation was the reintroduction of party professionals into the process in the form of "superdelegates." Did this cure work? By examining the accuracy of superdelegates' perceptions of the party following's positions on issues compared with those of ordinary delegates, this paper addresses part of this question. Using data about the views of delegates to the 1988 national party conventions and the 1988 American National Election Study, I show that the fears about postreform delegates being more out of touch with the party following than "professionals" (i.e., superdelegates) are largely overstated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248238204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248238204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01541643

DO - 10.1007/BF01541643

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34248238204

VL - 16

SP - 79

EP - 92

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

SN - 0190-9320

IS - 1

ER -