Are physical activity studies in Hispanics meeting reporting guidelines for continuous monitoring technology? A systematic review Energy balance-related behaviors

Charles S. Layne, Nathan H. Parker, Erica G. Soltero, José Rosales Chavez, Daniel P. O'Connor, Martina R. Gallagher, Rebecca Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Continuous monitoring technologies such as accelerometers and pedometers are the gold standard for physical activity (PA) measurement. However, inconsistencies in use, analysis, and reporting limit the understanding of dose-response relationships involving PA and the ability to make comparisons across studies and population subgroups. These issues are particularly detrimental to the study of PA across different ethnicities with different PA habits. This systematic review examined the inclusion of published guidelines involving data collection, processing, and reporting among articles using accelerometers or pedometers in Hispanic or Latino populations. Methods: English (PubMed; EbscoHost) and Spanish (SCIELO; Biblioteca Virtual en Salud) articles published between 2000 and 2013 using accelerometers or pedometers to measure PA among Hispanics or Latinos were identified through systematic literature searches. Of the 253 abstracts which were initially reviewed, 57 met eligibility criteria (44 accelerometer, 13 pedometer). Articles were coded and reviewed to evaluate compliance with recommended guidelines (N∈=∈20), and the percentage of accelerometer and pedometer articles following each guideline were computed and reported. Results: On average, 57.1 % of accelerometer and 62.2 % of pedometer articles reported each recommended guideline for data collection. Device manufacturer and model were reported most frequently, and provision of instructions for device wear in Spanish was reported least frequently. On average, 29.6 % of accelerometer articles reported each guideline for data processing. Definitions of an acceptable day for inclusion in analyses were reported most frequently, and definitions of an acceptable hour for inclusion in analyses were reported least frequently. On average, 18.8 % of accelerometer and 85.7 % of pedometer articles included each guideline for data reporting. Accelerometer articles most frequently included average number of valid days and least frequently included percentage of wear time. Discussion: Inclusion of standard collection and reporting procedures in studies using continuous monitoring devices in Hispanic or Latino population is generally low. Conclusions: Lack of reporting consistency in continuous monitoring studies limits researchers' ability to compare studies or draw meaningful conclusions concerning amounts, quality, and benefits of PA among Hispanic or Latino populations. Reporting data collection, computation, and decision-making standards should be required. Improved interpretability would allow practitioners and researchers to apply scientific findings to promote PA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number917
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 18 2015

Fingerprint

Hispanic Americans
Guidelines
Exercise
Technology
Aptitude
Equipment and Supplies
Population
Research Design
Research Personnel
PubMed
Habits
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Accelerometry
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Latinos
  • Measurement
  • Pedometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Are physical activity studies in Hispanics meeting reporting guidelines for continuous monitoring technology? A systematic review Energy balance-related behaviors. / Layne, Charles S.; Parker, Nathan H.; Soltero, Erica G.; Rosales Chavez, José; O'Connor, Daniel P.; Gallagher, Martina R.; Lee, Rebecca.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 15, No. 1, 917, 18.09.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Layne, Charles S. ; Parker, Nathan H. ; Soltero, Erica G. ; Rosales Chavez, José ; O'Connor, Daniel P. ; Gallagher, Martina R. ; Lee, Rebecca. / Are physical activity studies in Hispanics meeting reporting guidelines for continuous monitoring technology? A systematic review Energy balance-related behaviors. In: BMC Public Health. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 1.
@article{b35113e6d451417a88cf4e89c0425caa,
title = "Are physical activity studies in Hispanics meeting reporting guidelines for continuous monitoring technology? A systematic review Energy balance-related behaviors",
abstract = "Background: Continuous monitoring technologies such as accelerometers and pedometers are the gold standard for physical activity (PA) measurement. However, inconsistencies in use, analysis, and reporting limit the understanding of dose-response relationships involving PA and the ability to make comparisons across studies and population subgroups. These issues are particularly detrimental to the study of PA across different ethnicities with different PA habits. This systematic review examined the inclusion of published guidelines involving data collection, processing, and reporting among articles using accelerometers or pedometers in Hispanic or Latino populations. Methods: English (PubMed; EbscoHost) and Spanish (SCIELO; Biblioteca Virtual en Salud) articles published between 2000 and 2013 using accelerometers or pedometers to measure PA among Hispanics or Latinos were identified through systematic literature searches. Of the 253 abstracts which were initially reviewed, 57 met eligibility criteria (44 accelerometer, 13 pedometer). Articles were coded and reviewed to evaluate compliance with recommended guidelines (N∈=∈20), and the percentage of accelerometer and pedometer articles following each guideline were computed and reported. Results: On average, 57.1 {\%} of accelerometer and 62.2 {\%} of pedometer articles reported each recommended guideline for data collection. Device manufacturer and model were reported most frequently, and provision of instructions for device wear in Spanish was reported least frequently. On average, 29.6 {\%} of accelerometer articles reported each guideline for data processing. Definitions of an acceptable day for inclusion in analyses were reported most frequently, and definitions of an acceptable hour for inclusion in analyses were reported least frequently. On average, 18.8 {\%} of accelerometer and 85.7 {\%} of pedometer articles included each guideline for data reporting. Accelerometer articles most frequently included average number of valid days and least frequently included percentage of wear time. Discussion: Inclusion of standard collection and reporting procedures in studies using continuous monitoring devices in Hispanic or Latino population is generally low. Conclusions: Lack of reporting consistency in continuous monitoring studies limits researchers' ability to compare studies or draw meaningful conclusions concerning amounts, quality, and benefits of PA among Hispanic or Latino populations. Reporting data collection, computation, and decision-making standards should be required. Improved interpretability would allow practitioners and researchers to apply scientific findings to promote PA.",
keywords = "Accelerometry, Evidence-based practice, Latinos, Measurement, Pedometry",
author = "Layne, {Charles S.} and Parker, {Nathan H.} and Soltero, {Erica G.} and {Rosales Chavez}, Jos{\'e} and O'Connor, {Daniel P.} and Gallagher, {Martina R.} and Rebecca Lee",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-015-2266-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are physical activity studies in Hispanics meeting reporting guidelines for continuous monitoring technology? A systematic review Energy balance-related behaviors

AU - Layne, Charles S.

AU - Parker, Nathan H.

AU - Soltero, Erica G.

AU - Rosales Chavez, José

AU - O'Connor, Daniel P.

AU - Gallagher, Martina R.

AU - Lee, Rebecca

PY - 2015/9/18

Y1 - 2015/9/18

N2 - Background: Continuous monitoring technologies such as accelerometers and pedometers are the gold standard for physical activity (PA) measurement. However, inconsistencies in use, analysis, and reporting limit the understanding of dose-response relationships involving PA and the ability to make comparisons across studies and population subgroups. These issues are particularly detrimental to the study of PA across different ethnicities with different PA habits. This systematic review examined the inclusion of published guidelines involving data collection, processing, and reporting among articles using accelerometers or pedometers in Hispanic or Latino populations. Methods: English (PubMed; EbscoHost) and Spanish (SCIELO; Biblioteca Virtual en Salud) articles published between 2000 and 2013 using accelerometers or pedometers to measure PA among Hispanics or Latinos were identified through systematic literature searches. Of the 253 abstracts which were initially reviewed, 57 met eligibility criteria (44 accelerometer, 13 pedometer). Articles were coded and reviewed to evaluate compliance with recommended guidelines (N∈=∈20), and the percentage of accelerometer and pedometer articles following each guideline were computed and reported. Results: On average, 57.1 % of accelerometer and 62.2 % of pedometer articles reported each recommended guideline for data collection. Device manufacturer and model were reported most frequently, and provision of instructions for device wear in Spanish was reported least frequently. On average, 29.6 % of accelerometer articles reported each guideline for data processing. Definitions of an acceptable day for inclusion in analyses were reported most frequently, and definitions of an acceptable hour for inclusion in analyses were reported least frequently. On average, 18.8 % of accelerometer and 85.7 % of pedometer articles included each guideline for data reporting. Accelerometer articles most frequently included average number of valid days and least frequently included percentage of wear time. Discussion: Inclusion of standard collection and reporting procedures in studies using continuous monitoring devices in Hispanic or Latino population is generally low. Conclusions: Lack of reporting consistency in continuous monitoring studies limits researchers' ability to compare studies or draw meaningful conclusions concerning amounts, quality, and benefits of PA among Hispanic or Latino populations. Reporting data collection, computation, and decision-making standards should be required. Improved interpretability would allow practitioners and researchers to apply scientific findings to promote PA.

AB - Background: Continuous monitoring technologies such as accelerometers and pedometers are the gold standard for physical activity (PA) measurement. However, inconsistencies in use, analysis, and reporting limit the understanding of dose-response relationships involving PA and the ability to make comparisons across studies and population subgroups. These issues are particularly detrimental to the study of PA across different ethnicities with different PA habits. This systematic review examined the inclusion of published guidelines involving data collection, processing, and reporting among articles using accelerometers or pedometers in Hispanic or Latino populations. Methods: English (PubMed; EbscoHost) and Spanish (SCIELO; Biblioteca Virtual en Salud) articles published between 2000 and 2013 using accelerometers or pedometers to measure PA among Hispanics or Latinos were identified through systematic literature searches. Of the 253 abstracts which were initially reviewed, 57 met eligibility criteria (44 accelerometer, 13 pedometer). Articles were coded and reviewed to evaluate compliance with recommended guidelines (N∈=∈20), and the percentage of accelerometer and pedometer articles following each guideline were computed and reported. Results: On average, 57.1 % of accelerometer and 62.2 % of pedometer articles reported each recommended guideline for data collection. Device manufacturer and model were reported most frequently, and provision of instructions for device wear in Spanish was reported least frequently. On average, 29.6 % of accelerometer articles reported each guideline for data processing. Definitions of an acceptable day for inclusion in analyses were reported most frequently, and definitions of an acceptable hour for inclusion in analyses were reported least frequently. On average, 18.8 % of accelerometer and 85.7 % of pedometer articles included each guideline for data reporting. Accelerometer articles most frequently included average number of valid days and least frequently included percentage of wear time. Discussion: Inclusion of standard collection and reporting procedures in studies using continuous monitoring devices in Hispanic or Latino population is generally low. Conclusions: Lack of reporting consistency in continuous monitoring studies limits researchers' ability to compare studies or draw meaningful conclusions concerning amounts, quality, and benefits of PA among Hispanic or Latino populations. Reporting data collection, computation, and decision-making standards should be required. Improved interpretability would allow practitioners and researchers to apply scientific findings to promote PA.

KW - Accelerometry

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Latinos

KW - Measurement

KW - Pedometry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941947634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941947634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-015-2266-4

DO - 10.1186/s12889-015-2266-4

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 917

ER -