Are forensic experts already biased before adversarial legal parties hire them?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This survey of 206 forensic psychologists tested the "filtering" effects of preexisting expert attitudes in adversarial proceedings. Results confirmed the hypothesis that evaluator attitudes toward capital punishment influence willingness to accept capital case referrals from particular adversarial parties. Stronger death penalty opposition was associated with higher willingness to conduct evaluations for the defense and higher likelihood of rejecting referrals from all sources. Conversely, stronger support was associated with higher willingness to be involved in capital cases generally, regardless of referral source. The findings raise the specter of skewed evaluator involvement in capital evaluations, where evaluators willing to do capital casework may have stronger capital punishment support than evaluators who opt out, and evaluators with strong opposition may work selectively for the defense. The results may provide a partial explanation for the "allegiance effect" in adversarial legal settings such that preexisting attitudes may contribute to partisan participation through a self-selection process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0154434
JournalPLoS One
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Capital Punishment
Referral and Consultation
Economics
Psychology
forensic sciences
death

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Are forensic experts already biased before adversarial legal parties hire them? / Neal, Tess.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 11, No. 4, e0154434, 01.04.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d653ff09f266486588767c8f8afe0728,
title = "Are forensic experts already biased before adversarial legal parties hire them?",
abstract = "This survey of 206 forensic psychologists tested the {"}filtering{"} effects of preexisting expert attitudes in adversarial proceedings. Results confirmed the hypothesis that evaluator attitudes toward capital punishment influence willingness to accept capital case referrals from particular adversarial parties. Stronger death penalty opposition was associated with higher willingness to conduct evaluations for the defense and higher likelihood of rejecting referrals from all sources. Conversely, stronger support was associated with higher willingness to be involved in capital cases generally, regardless of referral source. The findings raise the specter of skewed evaluator involvement in capital evaluations, where evaluators willing to do capital casework may have stronger capital punishment support than evaluators who opt out, and evaluators with strong opposition may work selectively for the defense. The results may provide a partial explanation for the {"}allegiance effect{"} in adversarial legal settings such that preexisting attitudes may contribute to partisan participation through a self-selection process.",
author = "Tess Neal",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0154434",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are forensic experts already biased before adversarial legal parties hire them?

AU - Neal, Tess

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - This survey of 206 forensic psychologists tested the "filtering" effects of preexisting expert attitudes in adversarial proceedings. Results confirmed the hypothesis that evaluator attitudes toward capital punishment influence willingness to accept capital case referrals from particular adversarial parties. Stronger death penalty opposition was associated with higher willingness to conduct evaluations for the defense and higher likelihood of rejecting referrals from all sources. Conversely, stronger support was associated with higher willingness to be involved in capital cases generally, regardless of referral source. The findings raise the specter of skewed evaluator involvement in capital evaluations, where evaluators willing to do capital casework may have stronger capital punishment support than evaluators who opt out, and evaluators with strong opposition may work selectively for the defense. The results may provide a partial explanation for the "allegiance effect" in adversarial legal settings such that preexisting attitudes may contribute to partisan participation through a self-selection process.

AB - This survey of 206 forensic psychologists tested the "filtering" effects of preexisting expert attitudes in adversarial proceedings. Results confirmed the hypothesis that evaluator attitudes toward capital punishment influence willingness to accept capital case referrals from particular adversarial parties. Stronger death penalty opposition was associated with higher willingness to conduct evaluations for the defense and higher likelihood of rejecting referrals from all sources. Conversely, stronger support was associated with higher willingness to be involved in capital cases generally, regardless of referral source. The findings raise the specter of skewed evaluator involvement in capital evaluations, where evaluators willing to do capital casework may have stronger capital punishment support than evaluators who opt out, and evaluators with strong opposition may work selectively for the defense. The results may provide a partial explanation for the "allegiance effect" in adversarial legal settings such that preexisting attitudes may contribute to partisan participation through a self-selection process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974574194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974574194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0154434

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0154434

M3 - Article

C2 - 27124416

AN - SCOPUS:84974574194

VL - 11

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

M1 - e0154434

ER -