Archetype analysis in sustainability research: meanings, motivations, and evidence-based policy making

Christoph Oberlack, Diana Sietz, Elisabeth Bürgi Bonanomi, Ariane De Bremond, Jampel Dell' Angelo, Klaus Eisenack, Erle C. Ellis, M. David, Markus Giger, Andreas Heinimann, Christian Kimmich, Marcel Tj Kok, David Manuel Navarrete, Peter Messerli, Patrick Meyfroidt, Tomá! Václavík, Sergio Villamayor-Tomas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    15 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Archetypes are increasingly used as a methodological approach to understand recurrent patterns in variables and processes that shape the sustainability of social-ecological systems. The rapid growth and diversification of archetype analyses has generated variations, inconsistencies, and confusion about the meanings, potential, and limitations of archetypes. Based on a systematic review, a survey, and a workshop series, we provide a consolidated perspective on the core features and diverse meanings of archetype analysis in sustainability research, the motivations behind it, and its policy relevance. We identify three core features of archetype analysis: Recurrent patterns, multiple models, and intermediate abstraction. Two gradients help to apprehend the variety of meanings of archetype analysis that sustainability researchers have developed: (1) understanding archetypes as building blocks or as case typologies and (2) using archetypes for pattern recognition, diagnosis, or scenario development. We demonstrate how archetype analysis has been used to synthesize results from case studies, bridge the gap between global narratives and local realities, foster methodological interplay, and transfer knowledge about sustainability strategies across cases. We also critically examine the potential and limitations of archetype analysis in supporting evidence-based policy making through context-sensitive generalizations with case-level empirical validity. Finally, we identify future priorities, with a view to leveraging the full potential of archetype analysis for supporting sustainable development.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article number26
    JournalEcology and Society
    Volume24
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 2019

    Keywords

    • Archetype
    • Land systems
    • Social-ecological system
    • Sustainability
    • Vulnerability

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Archetype analysis in sustainability research: meanings, motivations, and evidence-based policy making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Oberlack, C., Sietz, D., Bonanomi, E. B., De Bremond, A., Dell' Angelo, J., Eisenack, K., Ellis, E. C., David, M., Giger, M., Heinimann, A., Kimmich, C., Kok, M. T., Navarrete, D. M., Messerli, P., Meyfroidt, P., Václavík, T., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2019). Archetype analysis in sustainability research: meanings, motivations, and evidence-based policy making. Ecology and Society, 24(2), [26]. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10747-240226