Approaches to a cortical vision prosthesis

Implications of electrode size and placement

Breanne P. Christie, Kari R. Ashmont, Paul A. House, Bradley Greger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. In order to move forward with the development of a cortical vision prosthesis, the critical issues in the field must be identified. Approach. To begin this process, we performed a brief review of several different cortical and retinal stimulation techniques that can be used to restore vision. Main results. Intracortical microelectrodes and epicortical macroelectrodes have been evaluated as the basis of a vision prosthesis. We concluded that an important knowledge gap necessitates an experimental in vivo performance evaluation of microelectrodes placed on the surface of the visual cortex. A comparison of the level of vision restored by intracortical versus epicortical microstimulation is necessary. Because foveal representation in the primary visual cortex involves more cortical columns per degree of visual field than does peripheral vision, restoration of foveal vision may require a large number of closely spaced microelectrodes. Based on previous studies of epicortical macrostimulation, it is possible that stimulation via surface microelectrodes could produce a lower spatial resolution, making them better suited for restoring peripheral vision. Significance. The validation of epicortical microstimulation in addition to the comparison of epicortical and intracortical approaches for vision restoration will fill an important knowledge gap and may have important implications for surgical strategies and device longevity. It is possible that the best approach to vision restoration will utilize both epicortical and intracortical microstimulation approaches, applying them appropriately to different visual representations in the primary visual cortex.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number025003
JournalJournal of Neural Engineering
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 23 2016

Fingerprint

Microelectrodes
Prostheses and Implants
Electrodes
Restoration
Visual Cortex
Visual Fields
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • artificial vision
  • cortex
  • electrical stimulation
  • neuroprostheses
  • vision prostheses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Approaches to a cortical vision prosthesis : Implications of electrode size and placement. / Christie, Breanne P.; Ashmont, Kari R.; House, Paul A.; Greger, Bradley.

In: Journal of Neural Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 2, 025003, 23.02.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1183a2e242e14d8ebebee6e235b2e752,
title = "Approaches to a cortical vision prosthesis: Implications of electrode size and placement",
abstract = "Objective. In order to move forward with the development of a cortical vision prosthesis, the critical issues in the field must be identified. Approach. To begin this process, we performed a brief review of several different cortical and retinal stimulation techniques that can be used to restore vision. Main results. Intracortical microelectrodes and epicortical macroelectrodes have been evaluated as the basis of a vision prosthesis. We concluded that an important knowledge gap necessitates an experimental in vivo performance evaluation of microelectrodes placed on the surface of the visual cortex. A comparison of the level of vision restored by intracortical versus epicortical microstimulation is necessary. Because foveal representation in the primary visual cortex involves more cortical columns per degree of visual field than does peripheral vision, restoration of foveal vision may require a large number of closely spaced microelectrodes. Based on previous studies of epicortical macrostimulation, it is possible that stimulation via surface microelectrodes could produce a lower spatial resolution, making them better suited for restoring peripheral vision. Significance. The validation of epicortical microstimulation in addition to the comparison of epicortical and intracortical approaches for vision restoration will fill an important knowledge gap and may have important implications for surgical strategies and device longevity. It is possible that the best approach to vision restoration will utilize both epicortical and intracortical microstimulation approaches, applying them appropriately to different visual representations in the primary visual cortex.",
keywords = "artificial vision, cortex, electrical stimulation, neuroprostheses, vision prostheses",
author = "Christie, {Breanne P.} and Ashmont, {Kari R.} and House, {Paul A.} and Bradley Greger",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/025003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Journal of Neural Engineering",
issn = "1741-2560",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaches to a cortical vision prosthesis

T2 - Implications of electrode size and placement

AU - Christie, Breanne P.

AU - Ashmont, Kari R.

AU - House, Paul A.

AU - Greger, Bradley

PY - 2016/2/23

Y1 - 2016/2/23

N2 - Objective. In order to move forward with the development of a cortical vision prosthesis, the critical issues in the field must be identified. Approach. To begin this process, we performed a brief review of several different cortical and retinal stimulation techniques that can be used to restore vision. Main results. Intracortical microelectrodes and epicortical macroelectrodes have been evaluated as the basis of a vision prosthesis. We concluded that an important knowledge gap necessitates an experimental in vivo performance evaluation of microelectrodes placed on the surface of the visual cortex. A comparison of the level of vision restored by intracortical versus epicortical microstimulation is necessary. Because foveal representation in the primary visual cortex involves more cortical columns per degree of visual field than does peripheral vision, restoration of foveal vision may require a large number of closely spaced microelectrodes. Based on previous studies of epicortical macrostimulation, it is possible that stimulation via surface microelectrodes could produce a lower spatial resolution, making them better suited for restoring peripheral vision. Significance. The validation of epicortical microstimulation in addition to the comparison of epicortical and intracortical approaches for vision restoration will fill an important knowledge gap and may have important implications for surgical strategies and device longevity. It is possible that the best approach to vision restoration will utilize both epicortical and intracortical microstimulation approaches, applying them appropriately to different visual representations in the primary visual cortex.

AB - Objective. In order to move forward with the development of a cortical vision prosthesis, the critical issues in the field must be identified. Approach. To begin this process, we performed a brief review of several different cortical and retinal stimulation techniques that can be used to restore vision. Main results. Intracortical microelectrodes and epicortical macroelectrodes have been evaluated as the basis of a vision prosthesis. We concluded that an important knowledge gap necessitates an experimental in vivo performance evaluation of microelectrodes placed on the surface of the visual cortex. A comparison of the level of vision restored by intracortical versus epicortical microstimulation is necessary. Because foveal representation in the primary visual cortex involves more cortical columns per degree of visual field than does peripheral vision, restoration of foveal vision may require a large number of closely spaced microelectrodes. Based on previous studies of epicortical macrostimulation, it is possible that stimulation via surface microelectrodes could produce a lower spatial resolution, making them better suited for restoring peripheral vision. Significance. The validation of epicortical microstimulation in addition to the comparison of epicortical and intracortical approaches for vision restoration will fill an important knowledge gap and may have important implications for surgical strategies and device longevity. It is possible that the best approach to vision restoration will utilize both epicortical and intracortical microstimulation approaches, applying them appropriately to different visual representations in the primary visual cortex.

KW - artificial vision

KW - cortex

KW - electrical stimulation

KW - neuroprostheses

KW - vision prostheses

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962439224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962439224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/025003

DO - 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/025003

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - Journal of Neural Engineering

JF - Journal of Neural Engineering

SN - 1741-2560

IS - 2

M1 - 025003

ER -