Applying Policy Process Theories to Environmental Governance Research

Themes and New Directions

Tatyana Ruseva, Megan Foster, Gwen Arnold, Saba Siddiki, Abigail York, Riley Pudney, Ziqiao Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Policy scholars have effectively leveraged policy process models, theories, and frameworks to respond to a variety of important environmental questions. For example, how do environmental issues arrive on the agendas of policymakers? What factors contribute to environmental policy change? What are the designs and effects of institutions (e.g., policies or cultural norms) on environmental governance? In this review, we survey the field of policy process scholarship, focusing on environmental governance, with three objectives. The first objective is to catalog the policy process models, theories, and frameworks most often featured in studies of environmental governance. The second is to capture the methodological choices commonly employed in the application of these models, theories, and frameworks in environmental domains. The third is to identify how these approaches deal with issues central to environmental governance research, including time, space, and policy scale. We aim to identify trends and strategies for integrating key considerations of scale into empirical policy process scholarship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S66-S95
JournalPolicy Studies Journal
Volume47
Issue numberS1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

model theory
governance
environmental policy
policy
environmental issue
trend

Keywords

  • environmental governance
  • policy process theory
  • scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Applying Policy Process Theories to Environmental Governance Research : Themes and New Directions. / Ruseva, Tatyana; Foster, Megan; Arnold, Gwen; Siddiki, Saba; York, Abigail; Pudney, Riley; Chen, Ziqiao.

In: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 47, No. S1, 01.05.2019, p. S66-S95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ruseva, T, Foster, M, Arnold, G, Siddiki, S, York, A, Pudney, R & Chen, Z 2019, 'Applying Policy Process Theories to Environmental Governance Research: Themes and New Directions', Policy Studies Journal, vol. 47, no. S1, pp. S66-S95. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12317
Ruseva, Tatyana ; Foster, Megan ; Arnold, Gwen ; Siddiki, Saba ; York, Abigail ; Pudney, Riley ; Chen, Ziqiao. / Applying Policy Process Theories to Environmental Governance Research : Themes and New Directions. In: Policy Studies Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 47, No. S1. pp. S66-S95.
@article{e6e92714b21747fb996aecf3f263af46,
title = "Applying Policy Process Theories to Environmental Governance Research: Themes and New Directions",
abstract = "Policy scholars have effectively leveraged policy process models, theories, and frameworks to respond to a variety of important environmental questions. For example, how do environmental issues arrive on the agendas of policymakers? What factors contribute to environmental policy change? What are the designs and effects of institutions (e.g., policies or cultural norms) on environmental governance? In this review, we survey the field of policy process scholarship, focusing on environmental governance, with three objectives. The first objective is to catalog the policy process models, theories, and frameworks most often featured in studies of environmental governance. The second is to capture the methodological choices commonly employed in the application of these models, theories, and frameworks in environmental domains. The third is to identify how these approaches deal with issues central to environmental governance research, including time, space, and policy scale. We aim to identify trends and strategies for integrating key considerations of scale into empirical policy process scholarship.",
keywords = "environmental governance, policy process theory, scale",
author = "Tatyana Ruseva and Megan Foster and Gwen Arnold and Saba Siddiki and Abigail York and Riley Pudney and Ziqiao Chen",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/psj.12317",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "S66--S95",
journal = "Policy Studies Journal",
issn = "0190-292X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying Policy Process Theories to Environmental Governance Research

T2 - Themes and New Directions

AU - Ruseva, Tatyana

AU - Foster, Megan

AU - Arnold, Gwen

AU - Siddiki, Saba

AU - York, Abigail

AU - Pudney, Riley

AU - Chen, Ziqiao

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Policy scholars have effectively leveraged policy process models, theories, and frameworks to respond to a variety of important environmental questions. For example, how do environmental issues arrive on the agendas of policymakers? What factors contribute to environmental policy change? What are the designs and effects of institutions (e.g., policies or cultural norms) on environmental governance? In this review, we survey the field of policy process scholarship, focusing on environmental governance, with three objectives. The first objective is to catalog the policy process models, theories, and frameworks most often featured in studies of environmental governance. The second is to capture the methodological choices commonly employed in the application of these models, theories, and frameworks in environmental domains. The third is to identify how these approaches deal with issues central to environmental governance research, including time, space, and policy scale. We aim to identify trends and strategies for integrating key considerations of scale into empirical policy process scholarship.

AB - Policy scholars have effectively leveraged policy process models, theories, and frameworks to respond to a variety of important environmental questions. For example, how do environmental issues arrive on the agendas of policymakers? What factors contribute to environmental policy change? What are the designs and effects of institutions (e.g., policies or cultural norms) on environmental governance? In this review, we survey the field of policy process scholarship, focusing on environmental governance, with three objectives. The first objective is to catalog the policy process models, theories, and frameworks most often featured in studies of environmental governance. The second is to capture the methodological choices commonly employed in the application of these models, theories, and frameworks in environmental domains. The third is to identify how these approaches deal with issues central to environmental governance research, including time, space, and policy scale. We aim to identify trends and strategies for integrating key considerations of scale into empirical policy process scholarship.

KW - environmental governance

KW - policy process theory

KW - scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064810744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064810744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/psj.12317

DO - 10.1111/psj.12317

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - S66-S95

JO - Policy Studies Journal

JF - Policy Studies Journal

SN - 0190-292X

IS - S1

ER -