TY - JOUR
T1 - Applying evolutionary genetics to developmental toxicology and risk assessment
AU - Leung, Maxwell C.K.
AU - Procter, Andrew C.
AU - Goldstone, Jared V.
AU - Foox, Jonathan
AU - DeSalle, Robert
AU - Mattingly, Carolyn J.
AU - Siddall, Mark E.
AU - Timme-Laragy, Alicia R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Evolutionary thinking continues to challenge our views on health and disease. Yet, there is a communication gap between evolutionary biologists and toxicologists in recognizing the connections among developmental pathways, high-throughput screening, and birth defects in humans. To increase our capability in identifying potential developmental toxicants in humans, we propose to apply evolutionary genetics to improve the experimental design and data interpretation with various in vitro and whole-organism models. We review five molecular systems of stress response and update 18 consensual cell–cell signaling pathways that are the hallmark for early development, organogenesis, and differentiation; and revisit the principles of teratology in light of recent advances in high-throughput screening, big data techniques, and systems toxicology. Multiscale systems modeling plays an integral role in the evolutionary approach to cross-species extrapolation. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative bioinformatics are both valuable tools in identifying and validating the molecular initiating events that account for adverse developmental outcomes in humans. The discordance of susceptibility between test species and humans (ontogeny) reflects their differences in evolutionary history (phylogeny). This synthesis not only can lead to novel applications in developmental toxicity and risk assessment, but also can pave the way for applying an evo-devo perspective to the study of developmental origins of health and disease.
AB - Evolutionary thinking continues to challenge our views on health and disease. Yet, there is a communication gap between evolutionary biologists and toxicologists in recognizing the connections among developmental pathways, high-throughput screening, and birth defects in humans. To increase our capability in identifying potential developmental toxicants in humans, we propose to apply evolutionary genetics to improve the experimental design and data interpretation with various in vitro and whole-organism models. We review five molecular systems of stress response and update 18 consensual cell–cell signaling pathways that are the hallmark for early development, organogenesis, and differentiation; and revisit the principles of teratology in light of recent advances in high-throughput screening, big data techniques, and systems toxicology. Multiscale systems modeling plays an integral role in the evolutionary approach to cross-species extrapolation. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative bioinformatics are both valuable tools in identifying and validating the molecular initiating events that account for adverse developmental outcomes in humans. The discordance of susceptibility between test species and humans (ontogeny) reflects their differences in evolutionary history (phylogeny). This synthesis not only can lead to novel applications in developmental toxicity and risk assessment, but also can pave the way for applying an evo-devo perspective to the study of developmental origins of health and disease.
KW - Birth defects
KW - Developmental toxicology
KW - Evo-Devo
KW - Evolutionary genetics
KW - High-throughput screening
KW - Signaling pathways
KW - Systems toxicology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014816230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014816230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.03.003
DO - 10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.03.003
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28267574
AN - SCOPUS:85014816230
SN - 0890-6238
VL - 69
SP - 174
EP - 186
JO - Reproductigve Toxicoloy
JF - Reproductigve Toxicoloy
ER -