Application of multicriteria decision analysis tools to two contaminated sediment case studies.

Boris I. Yatsalo, Gregory A. Kiker, St Jongbum Kim, Todd S. Bridges, Thomas Seager, Kevin Gardner, F. Kyle Satterstrom, Igor Linkov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Environmental decision making is becoming increasingly more information intensive and complex. Our previous work shows that multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) tools offer a scientifically sound decision analytical framework for environmental management, in general, and specifically for selecting optimal sediment management alternatives. Integration of MCDA into risk assessment and sediment management may require linkage of different models and software platforms whose results may lead to somewhat different conclusions. This paper illustrates the application of 3 different MCDA methods in 2 case studies involving contaminated sediment management. These case studies are based on real sediment management problems experienced by the US Army Corps of Engineers and other stakeholders in New York/New Jersey Harbor, USA, and the Cocheco River Superfund Site in New Hampshire, USA. Our analysis shows that application of 3 different MCDA tools points to similar management solutions no matter which tool is applied. MCDA tools and approaches were constructively used to elicit the strengths and weaknesses of each method when solving the problem.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-233
Number of pages11
JournalIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

decision analysis
Decision Support Techniques
sediment
management
Superfund
analytical framework
Rivers
environmental management
harbor
Decision Making
stakeholder
risk assessment
Software
decision making
military
engineer
software
river

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Application of multicriteria decision analysis tools to two contaminated sediment case studies. / Yatsalo, Boris I.; Kiker, Gregory A.; Kim, St Jongbum; Bridges, Todd S.; Seager, Thomas; Gardner, Kevin; Satterstrom, F. Kyle; Linkov, Igor.

In: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, 04.2007, p. 223-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yatsalo, Boris I. ; Kiker, Gregory A. ; Kim, St Jongbum ; Bridges, Todd S. ; Seager, Thomas ; Gardner, Kevin ; Satterstrom, F. Kyle ; Linkov, Igor. / Application of multicriteria decision analysis tools to two contaminated sediment case studies. In: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2007 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 223-233.
@article{2c4374b8e32e4cf4ad94b5139efe76c1,
title = "Application of multicriteria decision analysis tools to two contaminated sediment case studies.",
abstract = "Environmental decision making is becoming increasingly more information intensive and complex. Our previous work shows that multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) tools offer a scientifically sound decision analytical framework for environmental management, in general, and specifically for selecting optimal sediment management alternatives. Integration of MCDA into risk assessment and sediment management may require linkage of different models and software platforms whose results may lead to somewhat different conclusions. This paper illustrates the application of 3 different MCDA methods in 2 case studies involving contaminated sediment management. These case studies are based on real sediment management problems experienced by the US Army Corps of Engineers and other stakeholders in New York/New Jersey Harbor, USA, and the Cocheco River Superfund Site in New Hampshire, USA. Our analysis shows that application of 3 different MCDA tools points to similar management solutions no matter which tool is applied. MCDA tools and approaches were constructively used to elicit the strengths and weaknesses of each method when solving the problem.",
author = "Yatsalo, {Boris I.} and Kiker, {Gregory A.} and Kim, {St Jongbum} and Bridges, {Todd S.} and Thomas Seager and Kevin Gardner and Satterstrom, {F. Kyle} and Igor Linkov",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1897/IEAM_2006-036.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "223--233",
journal = "Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management",
issn = "1551-3793",
publisher = "SETAC Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of multicriteria decision analysis tools to two contaminated sediment case studies.

AU - Yatsalo, Boris I.

AU - Kiker, Gregory A.

AU - Kim, St Jongbum

AU - Bridges, Todd S.

AU - Seager, Thomas

AU - Gardner, Kevin

AU - Satterstrom, F. Kyle

AU - Linkov, Igor

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Environmental decision making is becoming increasingly more information intensive and complex. Our previous work shows that multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) tools offer a scientifically sound decision analytical framework for environmental management, in general, and specifically for selecting optimal sediment management alternatives. Integration of MCDA into risk assessment and sediment management may require linkage of different models and software platforms whose results may lead to somewhat different conclusions. This paper illustrates the application of 3 different MCDA methods in 2 case studies involving contaminated sediment management. These case studies are based on real sediment management problems experienced by the US Army Corps of Engineers and other stakeholders in New York/New Jersey Harbor, USA, and the Cocheco River Superfund Site in New Hampshire, USA. Our analysis shows that application of 3 different MCDA tools points to similar management solutions no matter which tool is applied. MCDA tools and approaches were constructively used to elicit the strengths and weaknesses of each method when solving the problem.

AB - Environmental decision making is becoming increasingly more information intensive and complex. Our previous work shows that multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) tools offer a scientifically sound decision analytical framework for environmental management, in general, and specifically for selecting optimal sediment management alternatives. Integration of MCDA into risk assessment and sediment management may require linkage of different models and software platforms whose results may lead to somewhat different conclusions. This paper illustrates the application of 3 different MCDA methods in 2 case studies involving contaminated sediment management. These case studies are based on real sediment management problems experienced by the US Army Corps of Engineers and other stakeholders in New York/New Jersey Harbor, USA, and the Cocheco River Superfund Site in New Hampshire, USA. Our analysis shows that application of 3 different MCDA tools points to similar management solutions no matter which tool is applied. MCDA tools and approaches were constructively used to elicit the strengths and weaknesses of each method when solving the problem.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250212524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250212524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1897/IEAM_2006-036.1

DO - 10.1897/IEAM_2006-036.1

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 223

EP - 233

JO - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

JF - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

SN - 1551-3793

IS - 2

ER -