TY - JOUR
T1 - Apples and oranges
T2 - three criteria for positive emotion typologies
AU - Desmet, Pieter MA
AU - Sauter, Disa A.
AU - Shiota, Michelle N.
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the organizers of the Lorentz workshop ‘Positive Affect: Nature, Neurochemistry and Function,’ Leiden, March 2–6, 2020 for initiating the ‘Positive Affect’ issue. The visualization in Figure 1 was inspired by an image published by Desmet and Fokkinga [ 31, p.8 ]. Pieter Desmet is supported by VICI grant number 453-16-009 of The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO); Disa Sauter is supported by ERC Starting grant no. 714977 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Positive emotion typologies, that is, classifications of positive emotions into conceptually distinct categories or ‘types’ according to their properties, can clarify and simplify the complex structure of positive emotion space. In this review, we introduce three key evaluative criteria for such typologies: comprehensiveness, distinctiveness, and granularity. Comprehensiveness is the degree to which the typology accurately represents the boundaries of positive emotion space; distinctiveness is whether emotional states are clustered on the basis of a consistent aspect of emotion; and granularity is the level of nuance and detail in categorization. These criteria provide standards by which the quality of existing typologies can be judged, as well as guiding the development of new typologies. Multiple valid and useful positive emotion typologies can be described; these criteria can guide scholars in selecting the typology that best suits their needs.
AB - Positive emotion typologies, that is, classifications of positive emotions into conceptually distinct categories or ‘types’ according to their properties, can clarify and simplify the complex structure of positive emotion space. In this review, we introduce three key evaluative criteria for such typologies: comprehensiveness, distinctiveness, and granularity. Comprehensiveness is the degree to which the typology accurately represents the boundaries of positive emotion space; distinctiveness is whether emotional states are clustered on the basis of a consistent aspect of emotion; and granularity is the level of nuance and detail in categorization. These criteria provide standards by which the quality of existing typologies can be judged, as well as guiding the development of new typologies. Multiple valid and useful positive emotion typologies can be described; these criteria can guide scholars in selecting the typology that best suits their needs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104110310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104110310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.012
DO - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.012
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85104110310
SN - 2352-1546
VL - 39
SP - 119
EP - 124
JO - Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
JF - Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
ER -