Aporetic and Productive Undecidedness of (Data in) Neoliberalism

Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, Marek Tesar, David Carlson, Anna Montana, Byoung Gyu Gong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In diverging from a follow-the-heard idealism that has scholars spinning in paradox, this article opens the possibility that neoliberal data can ground themselves in the reality of being in the world via a search for the immanent other, friend, concept, or practice. This article is not concerned with a search for ultimate (data) truth, but rather aporia and the intimate act of parrhesia, or truth-telling, as it is communicated in the context of life. We hover over whether data-as-friendship can be unplanned and unrehearsed as parrhesia, and not just part of the neoliberal networking scheme to gather more data, or follow regulations of “rigor” and “rightness.” We also ponder ways in which free and deregulated data (in all friendship forms) can enable complex, creative, and critical engagements with inquiry, participants, and our environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalQualitative Inquiry
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

neoliberalism
friendship
idealism
networking
regulation

Keywords

  • aporia
  • data
  • friendship
  • neoliberalism
  • parrhesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Aporetic and Productive Undecidedness of (Data in) Neoliberalism. / Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka; Tesar, Marek; Carlson, David; Montana, Anna; Gong, Byoung Gyu.

In: Qualitative Inquiry, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cc654687b9714130a1f96146fca0edf6,
title = "Aporetic and Productive Undecidedness of (Data in) Neoliberalism",
abstract = "In diverging from a follow-the-heard idealism that has scholars spinning in paradox, this article opens the possibility that neoliberal data can ground themselves in the reality of being in the world via a search for the immanent other, friend, concept, or practice. This article is not concerned with a search for ultimate (data) truth, but rather aporia and the intimate act of parrhesia, or truth-telling, as it is communicated in the context of life. We hover over whether data-as-friendship can be unplanned and unrehearsed as parrhesia, and not just part of the neoliberal networking scheme to gather more data, or follow regulations of “rigor” and “rightness.” We also ponder ways in which free and deregulated data (in all friendship forms) can enable complex, creative, and critical engagements with inquiry, participants, and our environments.",
keywords = "aporia, data, friendship, neoliberalism, parrhesia",
author = "Mirka Koro-Ljungberg and Marek Tesar and David Carlson and Anna Montana and Gong, {Byoung Gyu}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1077800418809533",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Qualitative Inquiry",
issn = "1077-8004",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aporetic and Productive Undecidedness of (Data in) Neoliberalism

AU - Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka

AU - Tesar, Marek

AU - Carlson, David

AU - Montana, Anna

AU - Gong, Byoung Gyu

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In diverging from a follow-the-heard idealism that has scholars spinning in paradox, this article opens the possibility that neoliberal data can ground themselves in the reality of being in the world via a search for the immanent other, friend, concept, or practice. This article is not concerned with a search for ultimate (data) truth, but rather aporia and the intimate act of parrhesia, or truth-telling, as it is communicated in the context of life. We hover over whether data-as-friendship can be unplanned and unrehearsed as parrhesia, and not just part of the neoliberal networking scheme to gather more data, or follow regulations of “rigor” and “rightness.” We also ponder ways in which free and deregulated data (in all friendship forms) can enable complex, creative, and critical engagements with inquiry, participants, and our environments.

AB - In diverging from a follow-the-heard idealism that has scholars spinning in paradox, this article opens the possibility that neoliberal data can ground themselves in the reality of being in the world via a search for the immanent other, friend, concept, or practice. This article is not concerned with a search for ultimate (data) truth, but rather aporia and the intimate act of parrhesia, or truth-telling, as it is communicated in the context of life. We hover over whether data-as-friendship can be unplanned and unrehearsed as parrhesia, and not just part of the neoliberal networking scheme to gather more data, or follow regulations of “rigor” and “rightness.” We also ponder ways in which free and deregulated data (in all friendship forms) can enable complex, creative, and critical engagements with inquiry, participants, and our environments.

KW - aporia

KW - data

KW - friendship

KW - neoliberalism

KW - parrhesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059064814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059064814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077800418809533

DO - 10.1177/1077800418809533

M3 - Article

JO - Qualitative Inquiry

JF - Qualitative Inquiry

SN - 1077-8004

ER -