Antigovernment sentiment and support for universal access to care: Are they incompatible?

Raymond L. Goldsteen, Karen Goldsteen, Jennie J. Kronenfeld, Neil E. Hann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives. Attitudes toward universal access to medical care were examined to determine whether support for it among people opposed to government involvement in health care was modified by three proxy measures of self-interest: being uninsured, in poor health, or a high user of medical care. Methods. Data on support for universal access, attitudes toward government involvement in health care, and the indicators of self-interest were obtained from a representative sample of adult Oklahomans (n = 1547) surveyed between October 1992 and December 1994. Forced-order multiple regression with interaction terms was the data analysis technique. Results. People opposed to government involvement in health care were found to be less likely to favor universal access to medical care, but poor health, lack of insurance, and high usage of medical care moderated this effect. Conclusions. The findings support the view that antigovernment sentiment need not foreclose the public option for health policymakers. Other considerations such as self-interest may modify the effect of unfavorable attitudes toward government.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-28
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume87
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Proxy
Health Insurance
Public Health
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Goldsteen, R. L., Goldsteen, K., Kronenfeld, J. J., & Hann, N. E. (1997). Antigovernment sentiment and support for universal access to care: Are they incompatible? American Journal of Public Health, 87(1), 25-28.

Antigovernment sentiment and support for universal access to care : Are they incompatible? / Goldsteen, Raymond L.; Goldsteen, Karen; Kronenfeld, Jennie J.; Hann, Neil E.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 87, No. 1, 01.1997, p. 25-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goldsteen, RL, Goldsteen, K, Kronenfeld, JJ & Hann, NE 1997, 'Antigovernment sentiment and support for universal access to care: Are they incompatible?', American Journal of Public Health, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 25-28.
Goldsteen, Raymond L. ; Goldsteen, Karen ; Kronenfeld, Jennie J. ; Hann, Neil E. / Antigovernment sentiment and support for universal access to care : Are they incompatible?. In: American Journal of Public Health. 1997 ; Vol. 87, No. 1. pp. 25-28.
@article{3c2604aefd2d41d189a0e2e7332b33bb,
title = "Antigovernment sentiment and support for universal access to care: Are they incompatible?",
abstract = "Objectives. Attitudes toward universal access to medical care were examined to determine whether support for it among people opposed to government involvement in health care was modified by three proxy measures of self-interest: being uninsured, in poor health, or a high user of medical care. Methods. Data on support for universal access, attitudes toward government involvement in health care, and the indicators of self-interest were obtained from a representative sample of adult Oklahomans (n = 1547) surveyed between October 1992 and December 1994. Forced-order multiple regression with interaction terms was the data analysis technique. Results. People opposed to government involvement in health care were found to be less likely to favor universal access to medical care, but poor health, lack of insurance, and high usage of medical care moderated this effect. Conclusions. The findings support the view that antigovernment sentiment need not foreclose the public option for health policymakers. Other considerations such as self-interest may modify the effect of unfavorable attitudes toward government.",
author = "Goldsteen, {Raymond L.} and Karen Goldsteen and Kronenfeld, {Jennie J.} and Hann, {Neil E.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "25--28",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antigovernment sentiment and support for universal access to care

T2 - Are they incompatible?

AU - Goldsteen, Raymond L.

AU - Goldsteen, Karen

AU - Kronenfeld, Jennie J.

AU - Hann, Neil E.

PY - 1997/1

Y1 - 1997/1

N2 - Objectives. Attitudes toward universal access to medical care were examined to determine whether support for it among people opposed to government involvement in health care was modified by three proxy measures of self-interest: being uninsured, in poor health, or a high user of medical care. Methods. Data on support for universal access, attitudes toward government involvement in health care, and the indicators of self-interest were obtained from a representative sample of adult Oklahomans (n = 1547) surveyed between October 1992 and December 1994. Forced-order multiple regression with interaction terms was the data analysis technique. Results. People opposed to government involvement in health care were found to be less likely to favor universal access to medical care, but poor health, lack of insurance, and high usage of medical care moderated this effect. Conclusions. The findings support the view that antigovernment sentiment need not foreclose the public option for health policymakers. Other considerations such as self-interest may modify the effect of unfavorable attitudes toward government.

AB - Objectives. Attitudes toward universal access to medical care were examined to determine whether support for it among people opposed to government involvement in health care was modified by three proxy measures of self-interest: being uninsured, in poor health, or a high user of medical care. Methods. Data on support for universal access, attitudes toward government involvement in health care, and the indicators of self-interest were obtained from a representative sample of adult Oklahomans (n = 1547) surveyed between October 1992 and December 1994. Forced-order multiple regression with interaction terms was the data analysis technique. Results. People opposed to government involvement in health care were found to be less likely to favor universal access to medical care, but poor health, lack of insurance, and high usage of medical care moderated this effect. Conclusions. The findings support the view that antigovernment sentiment need not foreclose the public option for health policymakers. Other considerations such as self-interest may modify the effect of unfavorable attitudes toward government.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031031266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031031266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9065221

AN - SCOPUS:0031031266

VL - 87

SP - 25

EP - 28

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 1

ER -