Anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance inconsistently predicts fatness in women with regional adiposity

Pamela Swan, Karen E. McConnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This investigation examined the accuracy of several generalizable anthropometric (ANTHRO) and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) regression equations to estimate % body fat (%BF) in women with either upper body (UB) or lower body (LB) fat distribution patterns. Methods: Thirty-six premenopausal women were individually matched for age (X̄ = 38.6 ± 6.6 yr), BMI (X̄ = 25.5 ± 4.2 kg-m-2) and %BF (30.3 ± 8.1%; hydrostatic, [UWW]) and placed by waist to hip ratio (WHR) into two distinct groups: LB (N = 18; WHR ≤ 0.73) and UB (N = 18; WHR ≥ 0.80). Equations tested were ANTHRO: Jackson et al. (JPW-7 and 3 site), 1980; Dumin and Womersley (DW), 1974; Tran and Weltman (TW), 1989; and Vogel et al. (V), 1988; BIA: Lohman (L), 1992; Gray et al. (G), 1989; and VanLoan and Mayclin (VLM), 1987. Circumference and skinfold measures were made by a trained technician. BIA (Vallhalla, 1990B) measures were taken 4 h postprandially under controlled conditions of water intake and exercise. %BF by UWW (criterion) was not different between groups (UB = 30.8 ± 8.2%; LB = 29.7 ± 8%). Results: In the UB group, three of five ANTHRO equations significantly overestimated %BF by approximately 6% (range = 3-8%) as compared with UWW. BIA overestimated %BF in UB by 5% using G and in both groups by about 6% using VLM, whereas L underestimated %BF in LB by about 4%. Conclusion: We conclude that ANTHRO and some BIA equations are accurate for predicting %BF in LB fat 'shaped' women but are not appropriate for women with primarily abdominal fat patterning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1068-1075
Number of pages8
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Anthropometry
Adiposity
Electric Impedance
Waist-Hip Ratio
Adipose Tissue
Body Fat Distribution
Abdominal Fat
Drinking
Exercise

Keywords

  • Body Composition
  • Body Fat Distribution
  • Densitometry
  • Percent Body Fat
  • Skinfolds
  • Waist to Hip Ratio

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance inconsistently predicts fatness in women with regional adiposity. / Swan, Pamela; McConnell, Karen E.

In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 31, No. 7, 1999, p. 1068-1075.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{86e07f6278dc481993414492fe373fb2,
title = "Anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance inconsistently predicts fatness in women with regional adiposity",
abstract = "Purpose: This investigation examined the accuracy of several generalizable anthropometric (ANTHRO) and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) regression equations to estimate {\%} body fat ({\%}BF) in women with either upper body (UB) or lower body (LB) fat distribution patterns. Methods: Thirty-six premenopausal women were individually matched for age (X̄ = 38.6 ± 6.6 yr), BMI (X̄ = 25.5 ± 4.2 kg-m-2) and {\%}BF (30.3 ± 8.1{\%}; hydrostatic, [UWW]) and placed by waist to hip ratio (WHR) into two distinct groups: LB (N = 18; WHR ≤ 0.73) and UB (N = 18; WHR ≥ 0.80). Equations tested were ANTHRO: Jackson et al. (JPW-7 and 3 site), 1980; Dumin and Womersley (DW), 1974; Tran and Weltman (TW), 1989; and Vogel et al. (V), 1988; BIA: Lohman (L), 1992; Gray et al. (G), 1989; and VanLoan and Mayclin (VLM), 1987. Circumference and skinfold measures were made by a trained technician. BIA (Vallhalla, 1990B) measures were taken 4 h postprandially under controlled conditions of water intake and exercise. {\%}BF by UWW (criterion) was not different between groups (UB = 30.8 ± 8.2{\%}; LB = 29.7 ± 8{\%}). Results: In the UB group, three of five ANTHRO equations significantly overestimated {\%}BF by approximately 6{\%} (range = 3-8{\%}) as compared with UWW. BIA overestimated {\%}BF in UB by 5{\%} using G and in both groups by about 6{\%} using VLM, whereas L underestimated {\%}BF in LB by about 4{\%}. Conclusion: We conclude that ANTHRO and some BIA equations are accurate for predicting {\%}BF in LB fat 'shaped' women but are not appropriate for women with primarily abdominal fat patterning.",
keywords = "Body Composition, Body Fat Distribution, Densitometry, Percent Body Fat, Skinfolds, Waist to Hip Ratio",
author = "Pamela Swan and McConnell, {Karen E.}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1097/00005768-199907000-00023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1068--1075",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance inconsistently predicts fatness in women with regional adiposity

AU - Swan, Pamela

AU - McConnell, Karen E.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Purpose: This investigation examined the accuracy of several generalizable anthropometric (ANTHRO) and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) regression equations to estimate % body fat (%BF) in women with either upper body (UB) or lower body (LB) fat distribution patterns. Methods: Thirty-six premenopausal women were individually matched for age (X̄ = 38.6 ± 6.6 yr), BMI (X̄ = 25.5 ± 4.2 kg-m-2) and %BF (30.3 ± 8.1%; hydrostatic, [UWW]) and placed by waist to hip ratio (WHR) into two distinct groups: LB (N = 18; WHR ≤ 0.73) and UB (N = 18; WHR ≥ 0.80). Equations tested were ANTHRO: Jackson et al. (JPW-7 and 3 site), 1980; Dumin and Womersley (DW), 1974; Tran and Weltman (TW), 1989; and Vogel et al. (V), 1988; BIA: Lohman (L), 1992; Gray et al. (G), 1989; and VanLoan and Mayclin (VLM), 1987. Circumference and skinfold measures were made by a trained technician. BIA (Vallhalla, 1990B) measures were taken 4 h postprandially under controlled conditions of water intake and exercise. %BF by UWW (criterion) was not different between groups (UB = 30.8 ± 8.2%; LB = 29.7 ± 8%). Results: In the UB group, three of five ANTHRO equations significantly overestimated %BF by approximately 6% (range = 3-8%) as compared with UWW. BIA overestimated %BF in UB by 5% using G and in both groups by about 6% using VLM, whereas L underestimated %BF in LB by about 4%. Conclusion: We conclude that ANTHRO and some BIA equations are accurate for predicting %BF in LB fat 'shaped' women but are not appropriate for women with primarily abdominal fat patterning.

AB - Purpose: This investigation examined the accuracy of several generalizable anthropometric (ANTHRO) and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) regression equations to estimate % body fat (%BF) in women with either upper body (UB) or lower body (LB) fat distribution patterns. Methods: Thirty-six premenopausal women were individually matched for age (X̄ = 38.6 ± 6.6 yr), BMI (X̄ = 25.5 ± 4.2 kg-m-2) and %BF (30.3 ± 8.1%; hydrostatic, [UWW]) and placed by waist to hip ratio (WHR) into two distinct groups: LB (N = 18; WHR ≤ 0.73) and UB (N = 18; WHR ≥ 0.80). Equations tested were ANTHRO: Jackson et al. (JPW-7 and 3 site), 1980; Dumin and Womersley (DW), 1974; Tran and Weltman (TW), 1989; and Vogel et al. (V), 1988; BIA: Lohman (L), 1992; Gray et al. (G), 1989; and VanLoan and Mayclin (VLM), 1987. Circumference and skinfold measures were made by a trained technician. BIA (Vallhalla, 1990B) measures were taken 4 h postprandially under controlled conditions of water intake and exercise. %BF by UWW (criterion) was not different between groups (UB = 30.8 ± 8.2%; LB = 29.7 ± 8%). Results: In the UB group, three of five ANTHRO equations significantly overestimated %BF by approximately 6% (range = 3-8%) as compared with UWW. BIA overestimated %BF in UB by 5% using G and in both groups by about 6% using VLM, whereas L underestimated %BF in LB by about 4%. Conclusion: We conclude that ANTHRO and some BIA equations are accurate for predicting %BF in LB fat 'shaped' women but are not appropriate for women with primarily abdominal fat patterning.

KW - Body Composition

KW - Body Fat Distribution

KW - Densitometry

KW - Percent Body Fat

KW - Skinfolds

KW - Waist to Hip Ratio

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032977766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032977766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005768-199907000-00023

DO - 10.1097/00005768-199907000-00023

M3 - Article

C2 - 10416572

AN - SCOPUS:0032977766

VL - 31

SP - 1068

EP - 1075

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 7

ER -