Antecedents to unethical corporate conduct

Characteristics of the complicit follower

Michael Mowchan, David Lowe, Philip Reckers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Appropriately, researchers are devoting increased attention to the behavioral antecedents to unethical conduct in business. Prior management research, however, has focused primarily on destructive leaders while little research has focused on complicit followers, especially outside of the management literature. Thus, this paper examines three individual characteristics of followers—impulsivity, authoritarianism, and proactivity—in an accounting context. Two quasi-experiments are conducted to determine whether each characteristic influences an individual’s intention for unethical complicity (Study 1) and ability to identify ethical dilemmas (Study 2). Results reveal that both high impulsivity and low authoritarianism lead to greater intention for unethical complicity and reduced ability to identify ethical dilemmas. Consistent with our prediction, high impulsivity and low authoritarianism interactively lead to the greatest intention for unethical complicity and lowest ability to identify ethical dilemmas. Additionally, in Study 1, high proactivity and high authoritarianism interactively lead to the greatest intention to resist supervisors’ requests for compliant misconduct. Important contributions and implications for both theory and practice are also discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-126
Number of pages32
JournalBehavioral Research in Accounting
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Authoritarianism
Follower
Ethical dilemmas
Impulsivity
Prediction
Management research
Supervisors
Quasi-experiment
Proactivity
Individual characteristics

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Impulsivity
  • Proactivity
  • Toxic triangle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Antecedents to unethical corporate conduct : Characteristics of the complicit follower. / Mowchan, Michael; Lowe, David; Reckers, Philip.

In: Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2015, p. 95-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{65a05a7dfe7b40a6bd62754427f24fa7,
title = "Antecedents to unethical corporate conduct: Characteristics of the complicit follower",
abstract = "Appropriately, researchers are devoting increased attention to the behavioral antecedents to unethical conduct in business. Prior management research, however, has focused primarily on destructive leaders while little research has focused on complicit followers, especially outside of the management literature. Thus, this paper examines three individual characteristics of followers—impulsivity, authoritarianism, and proactivity—in an accounting context. Two quasi-experiments are conducted to determine whether each characteristic influences an individual’s intention for unethical complicity (Study 1) and ability to identify ethical dilemmas (Study 2). Results reveal that both high impulsivity and low authoritarianism lead to greater intention for unethical complicity and reduced ability to identify ethical dilemmas. Consistent with our prediction, high impulsivity and low authoritarianism interactively lead to the greatest intention for unethical complicity and lowest ability to identify ethical dilemmas. Additionally, in Study 1, high proactivity and high authoritarianism interactively lead to the greatest intention to resist supervisors’ requests for compliant misconduct. Important contributions and implications for both theory and practice are also discussed.",
keywords = "Ethics, Impulsivity, Proactivity, Toxic triangle",
author = "Michael Mowchan and David Lowe and Philip Reckers",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.2308/bria-51186",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "95--126",
journal = "Behavioral Research in Accounting",
issn = "1050-4753",
publisher = "American Accounting Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antecedents to unethical corporate conduct

T2 - Characteristics of the complicit follower

AU - Mowchan, Michael

AU - Lowe, David

AU - Reckers, Philip

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Appropriately, researchers are devoting increased attention to the behavioral antecedents to unethical conduct in business. Prior management research, however, has focused primarily on destructive leaders while little research has focused on complicit followers, especially outside of the management literature. Thus, this paper examines three individual characteristics of followers—impulsivity, authoritarianism, and proactivity—in an accounting context. Two quasi-experiments are conducted to determine whether each characteristic influences an individual’s intention for unethical complicity (Study 1) and ability to identify ethical dilemmas (Study 2). Results reveal that both high impulsivity and low authoritarianism lead to greater intention for unethical complicity and reduced ability to identify ethical dilemmas. Consistent with our prediction, high impulsivity and low authoritarianism interactively lead to the greatest intention for unethical complicity and lowest ability to identify ethical dilemmas. Additionally, in Study 1, high proactivity and high authoritarianism interactively lead to the greatest intention to resist supervisors’ requests for compliant misconduct. Important contributions and implications for both theory and practice are also discussed.

AB - Appropriately, researchers are devoting increased attention to the behavioral antecedents to unethical conduct in business. Prior management research, however, has focused primarily on destructive leaders while little research has focused on complicit followers, especially outside of the management literature. Thus, this paper examines three individual characteristics of followers—impulsivity, authoritarianism, and proactivity—in an accounting context. Two quasi-experiments are conducted to determine whether each characteristic influences an individual’s intention for unethical complicity (Study 1) and ability to identify ethical dilemmas (Study 2). Results reveal that both high impulsivity and low authoritarianism lead to greater intention for unethical complicity and reduced ability to identify ethical dilemmas. Consistent with our prediction, high impulsivity and low authoritarianism interactively lead to the greatest intention for unethical complicity and lowest ability to identify ethical dilemmas. Additionally, in Study 1, high proactivity and high authoritarianism interactively lead to the greatest intention to resist supervisors’ requests for compliant misconduct. Important contributions and implications for both theory and practice are also discussed.

KW - Ethics

KW - Impulsivity

KW - Proactivity

KW - Toxic triangle

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947800526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947800526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2308/bria-51186

DO - 10.2308/bria-51186

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 95

EP - 126

JO - Behavioral Research in Accounting

JF - Behavioral Research in Accounting

SN - 1050-4753

IS - 2

ER -