Another look at gender-related differences in leadership behavior

Dorothy A. Winther, Samuel B. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This investigation examined self-related behavioral differences in terms of broad leadership styles using a methodology that minimized biases inherent in research designs previously employed to investigate this area. Subjects consisted of 40 males and 41 females who served in the role of leader, and who instructed both a male and a female subordinate in a card-sorting task. Experimental sessions were tape-recorded and transcribed, after which judges classified word phrases into various language categories. Factor analysis of the language categories yielded two factors of verbal behavior within a leadership situation: a socially oriented style and a task-oriented style. In contrast to generally accepted stereotypes, results indicated that within the present experimental context male leaders preferred to use phrases that indicated a more social style than female leaders. However, both male and female leaders used language that indicated a task-oriented approach to a significantly greater degree when instructing a female rather than a male subordinate. Implications and interpretations of the results are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-56
Number of pages16
JournalSex Roles
Volume16
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

leadership
leader
gender
Language
language
language behavior
Verbal Behavior
research planning
stereotype
factor analysis
Statistical Factor Analysis
Research Design
interpretation
present
methodology
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Another look at gender-related differences in leadership behavior. / Winther, Dorothy A.; Green, Samuel B.

In: Sex Roles, Vol. 16, No. 1-2, 01.1987, p. 41-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winther, Dorothy A. ; Green, Samuel B. / Another look at gender-related differences in leadership behavior. In: Sex Roles. 1987 ; Vol. 16, No. 1-2. pp. 41-56.
@article{fca90586368148a8b11650c7f9782b22,
title = "Another look at gender-related differences in leadership behavior",
abstract = "This investigation examined self-related behavioral differences in terms of broad leadership styles using a methodology that minimized biases inherent in research designs previously employed to investigate this area. Subjects consisted of 40 males and 41 females who served in the role of leader, and who instructed both a male and a female subordinate in a card-sorting task. Experimental sessions were tape-recorded and transcribed, after which judges classified word phrases into various language categories. Factor analysis of the language categories yielded two factors of verbal behavior within a leadership situation: a socially oriented style and a task-oriented style. In contrast to generally accepted stereotypes, results indicated that within the present experimental context male leaders preferred to use phrases that indicated a more social style than female leaders. However, both male and female leaders used language that indicated a task-oriented approach to a significantly greater degree when instructing a female rather than a male subordinate. Implications and interpretations of the results are discussed.",
author = "Winther, {Dorothy A.} and Green, {Samuel B.}",
year = "1987",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF00302850",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "41--56",
journal = "Sex Roles: A Journal of Research",
issn = "0360-0025",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Another look at gender-related differences in leadership behavior

AU - Winther, Dorothy A.

AU - Green, Samuel B.

PY - 1987/1

Y1 - 1987/1

N2 - This investigation examined self-related behavioral differences in terms of broad leadership styles using a methodology that minimized biases inherent in research designs previously employed to investigate this area. Subjects consisted of 40 males and 41 females who served in the role of leader, and who instructed both a male and a female subordinate in a card-sorting task. Experimental sessions were tape-recorded and transcribed, after which judges classified word phrases into various language categories. Factor analysis of the language categories yielded two factors of verbal behavior within a leadership situation: a socially oriented style and a task-oriented style. In contrast to generally accepted stereotypes, results indicated that within the present experimental context male leaders preferred to use phrases that indicated a more social style than female leaders. However, both male and female leaders used language that indicated a task-oriented approach to a significantly greater degree when instructing a female rather than a male subordinate. Implications and interpretations of the results are discussed.

AB - This investigation examined self-related behavioral differences in terms of broad leadership styles using a methodology that minimized biases inherent in research designs previously employed to investigate this area. Subjects consisted of 40 males and 41 females who served in the role of leader, and who instructed both a male and a female subordinate in a card-sorting task. Experimental sessions were tape-recorded and transcribed, after which judges classified word phrases into various language categories. Factor analysis of the language categories yielded two factors of verbal behavior within a leadership situation: a socially oriented style and a task-oriented style. In contrast to generally accepted stereotypes, results indicated that within the present experimental context male leaders preferred to use phrases that indicated a more social style than female leaders. However, both male and female leaders used language that indicated a task-oriented approach to a significantly greater degree when instructing a female rather than a male subordinate. Implications and interpretations of the results are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=6544228217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=6544228217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00302850

DO - 10.1007/BF00302850

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 41

EP - 56

JO - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

JF - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

SN - 0360-0025

IS - 1-2

ER -