Animated pedagogical agents

Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples?

Mary Margaret Lusk, Robert Atkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the impact of varying an animated pedagogical agent's level of embodiment in a learning environment consisting of static or animated multimodal worked examples illustrating how to solve multi-step proportional word problems. In the fully embodied condition, the agent was programmed to coordinate spoken instructional explanations with non-verbal forms of communication (locomotion, gesture, and gaze) to support learning. In the minimally embodied condition, the same agent provided the spoken instructions but remained static on the screen. In the voice-only condition, the spoken instructions were provided without an agent. Of the 174 college-age participants, those provided with the fully embodied agent produced more conceptually accurate answers to near and far transfer items than their counterparts in the voice-only condition. Moreover, participants that studied animated worked examples, where the problem's subgoals were presented sequentially over time, outperformed their peer, provided with static examples with simultaneously-presented subgoals on measures of transfer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)747-764
Number of pages18
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Learning
Gestures
Locomotion
Communication
Embodiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Animated pedagogical agents : Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? / Lusk, Mary Margaret; Atkinson, Robert.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 6, 09.2007, p. 747-764.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8ea0d7c9d2a24d8b999c49ccce8c934d,
title = "Animated pedagogical agents: Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples?",
abstract = "This study examined the impact of varying an animated pedagogical agent's level of embodiment in a learning environment consisting of static or animated multimodal worked examples illustrating how to solve multi-step proportional word problems. In the fully embodied condition, the agent was programmed to coordinate spoken instructional explanations with non-verbal forms of communication (locomotion, gesture, and gaze) to support learning. In the minimally embodied condition, the same agent provided the spoken instructions but remained static on the screen. In the voice-only condition, the spoken instructions were provided without an agent. Of the 174 college-age participants, those provided with the fully embodied agent produced more conceptually accurate answers to near and far transfer items than their counterparts in the voice-only condition. Moreover, participants that studied animated worked examples, where the problem's subgoals were presented sequentially over time, outperformed their peer, provided with static examples with simultaneously-presented subgoals on measures of transfer.",
author = "Lusk, {Mary Margaret} and Robert Atkinson",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/acp.1347",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "747--764",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Animated pedagogical agents

T2 - Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples?

AU - Lusk, Mary Margaret

AU - Atkinson, Robert

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - This study examined the impact of varying an animated pedagogical agent's level of embodiment in a learning environment consisting of static or animated multimodal worked examples illustrating how to solve multi-step proportional word problems. In the fully embodied condition, the agent was programmed to coordinate spoken instructional explanations with non-verbal forms of communication (locomotion, gesture, and gaze) to support learning. In the minimally embodied condition, the same agent provided the spoken instructions but remained static on the screen. In the voice-only condition, the spoken instructions were provided without an agent. Of the 174 college-age participants, those provided with the fully embodied agent produced more conceptually accurate answers to near and far transfer items than their counterparts in the voice-only condition. Moreover, participants that studied animated worked examples, where the problem's subgoals were presented sequentially over time, outperformed their peer, provided with static examples with simultaneously-presented subgoals on measures of transfer.

AB - This study examined the impact of varying an animated pedagogical agent's level of embodiment in a learning environment consisting of static or animated multimodal worked examples illustrating how to solve multi-step proportional word problems. In the fully embodied condition, the agent was programmed to coordinate spoken instructional explanations with non-verbal forms of communication (locomotion, gesture, and gaze) to support learning. In the minimally embodied condition, the same agent provided the spoken instructions but remained static on the screen. In the voice-only condition, the spoken instructions were provided without an agent. Of the 174 college-age participants, those provided with the fully embodied agent produced more conceptually accurate answers to near and far transfer items than their counterparts in the voice-only condition. Moreover, participants that studied animated worked examples, where the problem's subgoals were presented sequentially over time, outperformed their peer, provided with static examples with simultaneously-presented subgoals on measures of transfer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848913746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848913746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acp.1347

DO - 10.1002/acp.1347

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 747

EP - 764

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 6

ER -