Angry faces hold attention

Evidence of attentional adhesion in two paradigms

David Becker, Hansol Rheem, Cari M. Pick, Ahra Ko, Stacie R. Lafko

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that angry faces do not “pop-out” of crowds, and that the evidence for such effects has tended to arise from methodological issues and stimulus confounds. In contrast, evidence that angry faces exert special influence at later stages of information processing is accumulating. Here we use two common paradigms to show that participants have difficulty disengaging attention from angry faces relative to happy faces. Experiment 1 used a visual search task to show that angry crowds took longer to search. Experiment 2 used an exogenous cueing paradigm to show that brief onset angry faces held attention and delayed responses on a primary task. This suggests that when seen, they engage attention for longer time, but they do not have the preattentive features that would allow them to pop-out. Together, these two different experimental paradigms and realistic stimulus sets suggest that angry faces resist attentional disengagement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProgress in Brain Research
PublisherElsevier B.V.
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Publication series

NameProgress in Brain Research
ISSN (Print)0079-6123
ISSN (Electronic)1875-7855

Fingerprint

Automatic Data Processing

Keywords

  • Anger
  • Attention
  • Ecological psychology
  • Emotional expressions
  • Face perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Becker, D., Rheem, H., Pick, C. M., Ko, A., & Lafko, S. R. (2019). Angry faces hold attention: Evidence of attentional adhesion in two paradigms. In Progress in Brain Research (Progress in Brain Research). Elsevier B.V.. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.033

Angry faces hold attention : Evidence of attentional adhesion in two paradigms. / Becker, David; Rheem, Hansol; Pick, Cari M.; Ko, Ahra; Lafko, Stacie R.

Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier B.V., 2019. (Progress in Brain Research).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Becker, D, Rheem, H, Pick, CM, Ko, A & Lafko, SR 2019, Angry faces hold attention: Evidence of attentional adhesion in two paradigms. in Progress in Brain Research. Progress in Brain Research, Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.033
Becker D, Rheem H, Pick CM, Ko A, Lafko SR. Angry faces hold attention: Evidence of attentional adhesion in two paradigms. In Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier B.V. 2019. (Progress in Brain Research). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.033
Becker, David ; Rheem, Hansol ; Pick, Cari M. ; Ko, Ahra ; Lafko, Stacie R. / Angry faces hold attention : Evidence of attentional adhesion in two paradigms. Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier B.V., 2019. (Progress in Brain Research).
@inbook{d9dc4b882b4c4ea1beb01cfac3c27596,
title = "Angry faces hold attention: Evidence of attentional adhesion in two paradigms",
abstract = "Growing evidence suggests that angry faces do not “pop-out” of crowds, and that the evidence for such effects has tended to arise from methodological issues and stimulus confounds. In contrast, evidence that angry faces exert special influence at later stages of information processing is accumulating. Here we use two common paradigms to show that participants have difficulty disengaging attention from angry faces relative to happy faces. Experiment 1 used a visual search task to show that angry crowds took longer to search. Experiment 2 used an exogenous cueing paradigm to show that brief onset angry faces held attention and delayed responses on a primary task. This suggests that when seen, they engage attention for longer time, but they do not have the preattentive features that would allow them to pop-out. Together, these two different experimental paradigms and realistic stimulus sets suggest that angry faces resist attentional disengagement.",
keywords = "Anger, Attention, Ecological psychology, Emotional expressions, Face perception",
author = "David Becker and Hansol Rheem and Pick, {Cari M.} and Ahra Ko and Lafko, {Stacie R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.033",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Progress in Brain Research",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
booktitle = "Progress in Brain Research",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Angry faces hold attention

T2 - Evidence of attentional adhesion in two paradigms

AU - Becker, David

AU - Rheem, Hansol

AU - Pick, Cari M.

AU - Ko, Ahra

AU - Lafko, Stacie R.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Growing evidence suggests that angry faces do not “pop-out” of crowds, and that the evidence for such effects has tended to arise from methodological issues and stimulus confounds. In contrast, evidence that angry faces exert special influence at later stages of information processing is accumulating. Here we use two common paradigms to show that participants have difficulty disengaging attention from angry faces relative to happy faces. Experiment 1 used a visual search task to show that angry crowds took longer to search. Experiment 2 used an exogenous cueing paradigm to show that brief onset angry faces held attention and delayed responses on a primary task. This suggests that when seen, they engage attention for longer time, but they do not have the preattentive features that would allow them to pop-out. Together, these two different experimental paradigms and realistic stimulus sets suggest that angry faces resist attentional disengagement.

AB - Growing evidence suggests that angry faces do not “pop-out” of crowds, and that the evidence for such effects has tended to arise from methodological issues and stimulus confounds. In contrast, evidence that angry faces exert special influence at later stages of information processing is accumulating. Here we use two common paradigms to show that participants have difficulty disengaging attention from angry faces relative to happy faces. Experiment 1 used a visual search task to show that angry crowds took longer to search. Experiment 2 used an exogenous cueing paradigm to show that brief onset angry faces held attention and delayed responses on a primary task. This suggests that when seen, they engage attention for longer time, but they do not have the preattentive features that would allow them to pop-out. Together, these two different experimental paradigms and realistic stimulus sets suggest that angry faces resist attentional disengagement.

KW - Anger

KW - Attention

KW - Ecological psychology

KW - Emotional expressions

KW - Face perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064317795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064317795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.033

DO - 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.033

M3 - Chapter

T3 - Progress in Brain Research

BT - Progress in Brain Research

PB - Elsevier B.V.

ER -