And justice for all: Determinants and effects of probation officers' processing decisions regarding first-time juvenile offenders

Adam Fine, Sachiko Donley, Caitlin Cavanagh, Sarah Miltimore, Laurence Steinberg, Paul J. Frick, Elizabeth Cauffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When a youth is accused of committing a crime, juvenile justice system arbiters, such as probation officers, interview both the youth and the youth's guardian to gather information before deciding to either process the youth formally or informally. Factors about a youth that are unrelated to the criminal charge may contribute to arbiters' processing decisions. Such extralegal factors include demographic characteristics and characteristics of the youth's context (e.g., home environment, peer delinquency). Little is known about how extralegal factors other than age and race affect youth processing. The present study draws on data from probation officer assessment interviews with 359 male, first-time, low-level juvenile offenders, as well as longitudinal self-report and official records of a youth's reoffending after his first arrest, to determine how extralegal factors affect probation processing decisions, and whether processing is associated with youth reoffending and rearrest. The results indicate that even after taking into account legal factors and demographic characteristics, youth are more likely to be processed formally if they refuse to comment on the charge, if their probation officers believe their guardians to be relatively more disapproving of their friends, and if their probation officers perceive their home environments to be more problematic. Although youth who are processed formally self-report reoffending at the same rate as youth who are processed informally, youth who are processed formally are more likely to be rearrested in the subsequent 6 months. Implications for how processing decisions may promote sustained involvement in the juvenile justice system are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-117
Number of pages13
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

probation officer
juvenile offender
Social Justice
justice
determinants
Self Report
Demography
Interviews
charge
legal factors
probation
Age Factors
accused
Crime
demographic factors
delinquency
interview

Keywords

  • Juvenile justice
  • Juvenile probation
  • Processing decisions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

And justice for all : Determinants and effects of probation officers' processing decisions regarding first-time juvenile offenders. / Fine, Adam; Donley, Sachiko; Cavanagh, Caitlin; Miltimore, Sarah; Steinberg, Laurence; Frick, Paul J.; Cauffman, Elizabeth.

In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.02.2017, p. 105-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fine, Adam ; Donley, Sachiko ; Cavanagh, Caitlin ; Miltimore, Sarah ; Steinberg, Laurence ; Frick, Paul J. ; Cauffman, Elizabeth. / And justice for all : Determinants and effects of probation officers' processing decisions regarding first-time juvenile offenders. In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2017 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 105-117.
@article{96dff9e8b32a4645870fc5d9319e4b22,
title = "And justice for all: Determinants and effects of probation officers' processing decisions regarding first-time juvenile offenders",
abstract = "When a youth is accused of committing a crime, juvenile justice system arbiters, such as probation officers, interview both the youth and the youth's guardian to gather information before deciding to either process the youth formally or informally. Factors about a youth that are unrelated to the criminal charge may contribute to arbiters' processing decisions. Such extralegal factors include demographic characteristics and characteristics of the youth's context (e.g., home environment, peer delinquency). Little is known about how extralegal factors other than age and race affect youth processing. The present study draws on data from probation officer assessment interviews with 359 male, first-time, low-level juvenile offenders, as well as longitudinal self-report and official records of a youth's reoffending after his first arrest, to determine how extralegal factors affect probation processing decisions, and whether processing is associated with youth reoffending and rearrest. The results indicate that even after taking into account legal factors and demographic characteristics, youth are more likely to be processed formally if they refuse to comment on the charge, if their probation officers believe their guardians to be relatively more disapproving of their friends, and if their probation officers perceive their home environments to be more problematic. Although youth who are processed formally self-report reoffending at the same rate as youth who are processed informally, youth who are processed formally are more likely to be rearrested in the subsequent 6 months. Implications for how processing decisions may promote sustained involvement in the juvenile justice system are discussed.",
keywords = "Juvenile justice, Juvenile probation, Processing decisions",
author = "Adam Fine and Sachiko Donley and Caitlin Cavanagh and Sarah Miltimore and Laurence Steinberg and Frick, {Paul J.} and Elizabeth Cauffman",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/law0000113",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "105--117",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - And justice for all

T2 - Determinants and effects of probation officers' processing decisions regarding first-time juvenile offenders

AU - Fine, Adam

AU - Donley, Sachiko

AU - Cavanagh, Caitlin

AU - Miltimore, Sarah

AU - Steinberg, Laurence

AU - Frick, Paul J.

AU - Cauffman, Elizabeth

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - When a youth is accused of committing a crime, juvenile justice system arbiters, such as probation officers, interview both the youth and the youth's guardian to gather information before deciding to either process the youth formally or informally. Factors about a youth that are unrelated to the criminal charge may contribute to arbiters' processing decisions. Such extralegal factors include demographic characteristics and characteristics of the youth's context (e.g., home environment, peer delinquency). Little is known about how extralegal factors other than age and race affect youth processing. The present study draws on data from probation officer assessment interviews with 359 male, first-time, low-level juvenile offenders, as well as longitudinal self-report and official records of a youth's reoffending after his first arrest, to determine how extralegal factors affect probation processing decisions, and whether processing is associated with youth reoffending and rearrest. The results indicate that even after taking into account legal factors and demographic characteristics, youth are more likely to be processed formally if they refuse to comment on the charge, if their probation officers believe their guardians to be relatively more disapproving of their friends, and if their probation officers perceive their home environments to be more problematic. Although youth who are processed formally self-report reoffending at the same rate as youth who are processed informally, youth who are processed formally are more likely to be rearrested in the subsequent 6 months. Implications for how processing decisions may promote sustained involvement in the juvenile justice system are discussed.

AB - When a youth is accused of committing a crime, juvenile justice system arbiters, such as probation officers, interview both the youth and the youth's guardian to gather information before deciding to either process the youth formally or informally. Factors about a youth that are unrelated to the criminal charge may contribute to arbiters' processing decisions. Such extralegal factors include demographic characteristics and characteristics of the youth's context (e.g., home environment, peer delinquency). Little is known about how extralegal factors other than age and race affect youth processing. The present study draws on data from probation officer assessment interviews with 359 male, first-time, low-level juvenile offenders, as well as longitudinal self-report and official records of a youth's reoffending after his first arrest, to determine how extralegal factors affect probation processing decisions, and whether processing is associated with youth reoffending and rearrest. The results indicate that even after taking into account legal factors and demographic characteristics, youth are more likely to be processed formally if they refuse to comment on the charge, if their probation officers believe their guardians to be relatively more disapproving of their friends, and if their probation officers perceive their home environments to be more problematic. Although youth who are processed formally self-report reoffending at the same rate as youth who are processed informally, youth who are processed formally are more likely to be rearrested in the subsequent 6 months. Implications for how processing decisions may promote sustained involvement in the juvenile justice system are discussed.

KW - Juvenile justice

KW - Juvenile probation

KW - Processing decisions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011396182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011396182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/law0000113

DO - 10.1037/law0000113

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85011396182

VL - 23

SP - 105

EP - 117

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 1

ER -