Analyzing women's studies dissertations: Methodologies, epistemologies, and field formation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study presents an in-depth analysis of women's studies doctoral dissertations produced in the United States between 1995 and 2008. We identified 117 total dissertations and coded their topics, themes, and methodologies. We found eight dominant dissertation topics: identity/subjectivity, gender norms, resistance/activism/power, cultural texts, nationalism/citizenship, harassment/violence/victimization/trauma, race, and sexuality. While humanities-based methodologies, particularly historical and representational, dominate the sample, they are often combined with qualitative or ethnographic methods, particularly interviewing. Regardless of the methods employed or discussed, reflexivity, lived experience, and agency constituted the core of feminist methodology for many dissertation writers. We analyze the successes and challenges of producing interdisciplinary dissertations in freestanding women's studies programs and provide an analysis of a select number of dissertations purposefully chosen to reflect larger trends. Challenges discussed include failure to specify (with precision) key terms such as intersectionality, interdisciplinarity, and transnationality; not providing a sufficient discussion of feminist methodology to justify the link between argumentation and evidence; not choosing topics outside of the writer's comfort zone; and not problematizing the connection between experience, identity, and knowledge. We conclude with recommendations for improving dissertation advising and promoting innovation, which range from strengthening the fundamentals of research design and writing to clarifying the unique characteristics and appropriate assumptions of the field as a whole.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-126
Number of pages28
JournalSigns
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

women's studies
earning a doctorate
epistemology
methodology
writer
transnationality
intersectionality
interdisciplinarity
study program
reflexivity
Epistemology
Women's Studies
Methodology
argumentation
victimization
research planning
subjectivity
nationalism
trauma
sexuality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Analyzing women's studies dissertations : Methodologies, epistemologies, and field formation. / Kitch, Sally; Fonow, Mary.

In: Signs, Vol. 38, No. 1, 09.2012, p. 99-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3c92b5d463b14119af19050df01c0e8e,
title = "Analyzing women's studies dissertations: Methodologies, epistemologies, and field formation",
abstract = "This study presents an in-depth analysis of women's studies doctoral dissertations produced in the United States between 1995 and 2008. We identified 117 total dissertations and coded their topics, themes, and methodologies. We found eight dominant dissertation topics: identity/subjectivity, gender norms, resistance/activism/power, cultural texts, nationalism/citizenship, harassment/violence/victimization/trauma, race, and sexuality. While humanities-based methodologies, particularly historical and representational, dominate the sample, they are often combined with qualitative or ethnographic methods, particularly interviewing. Regardless of the methods employed or discussed, reflexivity, lived experience, and agency constituted the core of feminist methodology for many dissertation writers. We analyze the successes and challenges of producing interdisciplinary dissertations in freestanding women's studies programs and provide an analysis of a select number of dissertations purposefully chosen to reflect larger trends. Challenges discussed include failure to specify (with precision) key terms such as intersectionality, interdisciplinarity, and transnationality; not providing a sufficient discussion of feminist methodology to justify the link between argumentation and evidence; not choosing topics outside of the writer's comfort zone; and not problematizing the connection between experience, identity, and knowledge. We conclude with recommendations for improving dissertation advising and promoting innovation, which range from strengthening the fundamentals of research design and writing to clarifying the unique characteristics and appropriate assumptions of the field as a whole.",
author = "Sally Kitch and Mary Fonow",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1086/665801",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "99--126",
journal = "Signs",
issn = "0097-9740",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analyzing women's studies dissertations

T2 - Methodologies, epistemologies, and field formation

AU - Kitch, Sally

AU - Fonow, Mary

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - This study presents an in-depth analysis of women's studies doctoral dissertations produced in the United States between 1995 and 2008. We identified 117 total dissertations and coded their topics, themes, and methodologies. We found eight dominant dissertation topics: identity/subjectivity, gender norms, resistance/activism/power, cultural texts, nationalism/citizenship, harassment/violence/victimization/trauma, race, and sexuality. While humanities-based methodologies, particularly historical and representational, dominate the sample, they are often combined with qualitative or ethnographic methods, particularly interviewing. Regardless of the methods employed or discussed, reflexivity, lived experience, and agency constituted the core of feminist methodology for many dissertation writers. We analyze the successes and challenges of producing interdisciplinary dissertations in freestanding women's studies programs and provide an analysis of a select number of dissertations purposefully chosen to reflect larger trends. Challenges discussed include failure to specify (with precision) key terms such as intersectionality, interdisciplinarity, and transnationality; not providing a sufficient discussion of feminist methodology to justify the link between argumentation and evidence; not choosing topics outside of the writer's comfort zone; and not problematizing the connection between experience, identity, and knowledge. We conclude with recommendations for improving dissertation advising and promoting innovation, which range from strengthening the fundamentals of research design and writing to clarifying the unique characteristics and appropriate assumptions of the field as a whole.

AB - This study presents an in-depth analysis of women's studies doctoral dissertations produced in the United States between 1995 and 2008. We identified 117 total dissertations and coded their topics, themes, and methodologies. We found eight dominant dissertation topics: identity/subjectivity, gender norms, resistance/activism/power, cultural texts, nationalism/citizenship, harassment/violence/victimization/trauma, race, and sexuality. While humanities-based methodologies, particularly historical and representational, dominate the sample, they are often combined with qualitative or ethnographic methods, particularly interviewing. Regardless of the methods employed or discussed, reflexivity, lived experience, and agency constituted the core of feminist methodology for many dissertation writers. We analyze the successes and challenges of producing interdisciplinary dissertations in freestanding women's studies programs and provide an analysis of a select number of dissertations purposefully chosen to reflect larger trends. Challenges discussed include failure to specify (with precision) key terms such as intersectionality, interdisciplinarity, and transnationality; not providing a sufficient discussion of feminist methodology to justify the link between argumentation and evidence; not choosing topics outside of the writer's comfort zone; and not problematizing the connection between experience, identity, and knowledge. We conclude with recommendations for improving dissertation advising and promoting innovation, which range from strengthening the fundamentals of research design and writing to clarifying the unique characteristics and appropriate assumptions of the field as a whole.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865371535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865371535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/665801

DO - 10.1086/665801

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84865371535

VL - 38

SP - 99

EP - 126

JO - Signs

JF - Signs

SN - 0097-9740

IS - 1

ER -