Analyzing unreplicated gauge R&R studies

Michael S. Hamada, Connie M. Borror

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we show how to analyze an unreplicated gauge repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) study and show the limitations caused by the lack of replication. We use a Bayesian approach and demonstrate it with studies in which the true part or item values either are unknown or known. WinBUGS code is provided for these examples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-551
Number of pages9
JournalQuality Engineering
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

Gages

Keywords

  • Bayesian methods
  • measurement system assessment
  • quality metrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Analyzing unreplicated gauge R&R studies. / Hamada, Michael S.; Borror, Connie M.

In: Quality Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.10.2012, p. 543-551.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hamada, Michael S. ; Borror, Connie M. / Analyzing unreplicated gauge R&R studies. In: Quality Engineering. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 543-551.
@article{ed300bd92a204cecbbed78b1af927f6f,
title = "Analyzing unreplicated gauge R&R studies",
abstract = "In this article, we show how to analyze an unreplicated gauge repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) study and show the limitations caused by the lack of replication. We use a Bayesian approach and demonstrate it with studies in which the true part or item values either are unknown or known. WinBUGS code is provided for these examples.",
keywords = "Bayesian methods, measurement system assessment, quality metrics",
author = "Hamada, {Michael S.} and Borror, {Connie M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08982112.2012.714338",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "543--551",
journal = "Quality Engineering",
issn = "0898-2112",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analyzing unreplicated gauge R&R studies

AU - Hamada, Michael S.

AU - Borror, Connie M.

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - In this article, we show how to analyze an unreplicated gauge repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) study and show the limitations caused by the lack of replication. We use a Bayesian approach and demonstrate it with studies in which the true part or item values either are unknown or known. WinBUGS code is provided for these examples.

AB - In this article, we show how to analyze an unreplicated gauge repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) study and show the limitations caused by the lack of replication. We use a Bayesian approach and demonstrate it with studies in which the true part or item values either are unknown or known. WinBUGS code is provided for these examples.

KW - Bayesian methods

KW - measurement system assessment

KW - quality metrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867073792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867073792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08982112.2012.714338

DO - 10.1080/08982112.2012.714338

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 543

EP - 551

JO - Quality Engineering

JF - Quality Engineering

SN - 0898-2112

IS - 4

ER -