Analysis of the process of encoding guidelines: A comparison of GLIF2 and GLIF3

Vimla Patel, T. Branch, Dongwen Wang, M. Peleg, A. Boxwala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the use of a modified version of the Guideline Interchange Format (GLIF), GLIF3, in the translation of clinical practice guidelines into an electronically encoded form such that they may be shared among various clinical institutions and settings. Methods: Based on theories and methods from cognitive science, the encoding of two clinical practice guidelines into two guideline modeling methods (GLIF3 and an earlier version, GLIF2) by two medical informaticians was captured on video and transcribed and annotated for analysis. Results: Differing in both content and structure, the representations developed in GLIF3 were found to contain a greater level of representational detail and less ambiguity than those developed in GLIF2. Conclusions: The use of GLIF3 in the encoding of clinical guidelines offers significant improvements due to its greater formality as compared to earlier versions of GLIF.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-113
Number of pages9
JournalMethods of Information in Medicine
Volume41
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Guidelines
Practice Guidelines
Cognitive Science

Keywords

  • Cognitive science
  • Evaluation studies
  • Knowledge
  • Practice guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Analysis of the process of encoding guidelines : A comparison of GLIF2 and GLIF3. / Patel, Vimla; Branch, T.; Wang, Dongwen; Peleg, M.; Boxwala, A.

In: Methods of Information in Medicine, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2002, p. 105-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, V, Branch, T, Wang, D, Peleg, M & Boxwala, A 2002, 'Analysis of the process of encoding guidelines: A comparison of GLIF2 and GLIF3', Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 105-113.
Patel, Vimla ; Branch, T. ; Wang, Dongwen ; Peleg, M. ; Boxwala, A. / Analysis of the process of encoding guidelines : A comparison of GLIF2 and GLIF3. In: Methods of Information in Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 105-113.
@article{4194b7ab80d04ea29a45386f0d56a8da,
title = "Analysis of the process of encoding guidelines: A comparison of GLIF2 and GLIF3",
abstract = "Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the use of a modified version of the Guideline Interchange Format (GLIF), GLIF3, in the translation of clinical practice guidelines into an electronically encoded form such that they may be shared among various clinical institutions and settings. Methods: Based on theories and methods from cognitive science, the encoding of two clinical practice guidelines into two guideline modeling methods (GLIF3 and an earlier version, GLIF2) by two medical informaticians was captured on video and transcribed and annotated for analysis. Results: Differing in both content and structure, the representations developed in GLIF3 were found to contain a greater level of representational detail and less ambiguity than those developed in GLIF2. Conclusions: The use of GLIF3 in the encoding of clinical guidelines offers significant improvements due to its greater formality as compared to earlier versions of GLIF.",
keywords = "Cognitive science, Evaluation studies, Knowledge, Practice guidelines",
author = "Vimla Patel and T. Branch and Dongwen Wang and M. Peleg and A. Boxwala",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "105--113",
journal = "Methods of Information in Medicine",
issn = "0026-1270",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of the process of encoding guidelines

T2 - A comparison of GLIF2 and GLIF3

AU - Patel, Vimla

AU - Branch, T.

AU - Wang, Dongwen

AU - Peleg, M.

AU - Boxwala, A.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the use of a modified version of the Guideline Interchange Format (GLIF), GLIF3, in the translation of clinical practice guidelines into an electronically encoded form such that they may be shared among various clinical institutions and settings. Methods: Based on theories and methods from cognitive science, the encoding of two clinical practice guidelines into two guideline modeling methods (GLIF3 and an earlier version, GLIF2) by two medical informaticians was captured on video and transcribed and annotated for analysis. Results: Differing in both content and structure, the representations developed in GLIF3 were found to contain a greater level of representational detail and less ambiguity than those developed in GLIF2. Conclusions: The use of GLIF3 in the encoding of clinical guidelines offers significant improvements due to its greater formality as compared to earlier versions of GLIF.

AB - Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the use of a modified version of the Guideline Interchange Format (GLIF), GLIF3, in the translation of clinical practice guidelines into an electronically encoded form such that they may be shared among various clinical institutions and settings. Methods: Based on theories and methods from cognitive science, the encoding of two clinical practice guidelines into two guideline modeling methods (GLIF3 and an earlier version, GLIF2) by two medical informaticians was captured on video and transcribed and annotated for analysis. Results: Differing in both content and structure, the representations developed in GLIF3 were found to contain a greater level of representational detail and less ambiguity than those developed in GLIF2. Conclusions: The use of GLIF3 in the encoding of clinical guidelines offers significant improvements due to its greater formality as compared to earlier versions of GLIF.

KW - Cognitive science

KW - Evaluation studies

KW - Knowledge

KW - Practice guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036100105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036100105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12061116

AN - SCOPUS:0036100105

VL - 41

SP - 105

EP - 113

JO - Methods of Information in Medicine

JF - Methods of Information in Medicine

SN - 0026-1270

IS - 2

ER -