Analysis of Arizona's LEED for new construction population's credits

Kenneth Sullivan, Hugo Dixon Oates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Existing literature has failed to identify credit patterns amongst buildings that have achieved various certification levels within the leadership in energy and environmental design for new construction (LEED NC) rating system. Although credit scorecard information had been available for some LEED NC certified projects on the U.S. Green Building Council's (USGBC) website, no one had published a detailed credit analysis or overall credit trends. Furthermore, the few studies that correlated LEED credits with utility consumption returned null results. This technical paper examines LEED NC credit trends for 91% of Arizona's 53-building LEED NC building population in an effort to identify credit patterns and to determine if credits correlate with either water or power consumption. Data collection efforts were successful for all desired deliverables except water consumption. Credit patterns emerged, exhibiting the most and least commonly attained credits, differences were identified between consultant populations, and credit strategy patterns were demonstrated inherent in each progresssivly more demanding certification level. Water collection was unsuccessful, rendering water correlations impossible. Collection of energy consumption data were successful yet produced few statistically significant correlations. The study's results demonstrate to industry practitioners and researchers that the 69-point LEED NC rating system failed to demonstrate substantial correlations between energy use and credits within the Arizona population, thereby discounting energy conservation strategies inherent in LEED NC versions 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2. The results also highlight the need to incentivize those credits which produce the greatest environmental benefit throughout the building's full life cycle. The authors discuss energy correlations in greater detail in another publication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1386-1393
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume138
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Water
Environmental design
Credit
Websites
Life cycle
Energy conservation
Electric power utilization
Energy utilization
Energy
Industry
Rating system
Certification

Keywords

  • Arizona
  • Building consumption
  • Energy consumption
  • LEED credits
  • Measurement
  • Postoccupancy survey
  • Sustainable development
  • U.S. Green Building Council
  • Water consumption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Strategy and Management
  • Industrial relations
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Analysis of Arizona's LEED for new construction population's credits. / Sullivan, Kenneth; Oates, Hugo Dixon.

In: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 138, No. 12, 12.2012, p. 1386-1393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c57bd740be74ce9a79c30dd8d89c9d0,
title = "Analysis of Arizona's LEED for new construction population's credits",
abstract = "Existing literature has failed to identify credit patterns amongst buildings that have achieved various certification levels within the leadership in energy and environmental design for new construction (LEED NC) rating system. Although credit scorecard information had been available for some LEED NC certified projects on the U.S. Green Building Council's (USGBC) website, no one had published a detailed credit analysis or overall credit trends. Furthermore, the few studies that correlated LEED credits with utility consumption returned null results. This technical paper examines LEED NC credit trends for 91{\%} of Arizona's 53-building LEED NC building population in an effort to identify credit patterns and to determine if credits correlate with either water or power consumption. Data collection efforts were successful for all desired deliverables except water consumption. Credit patterns emerged, exhibiting the most and least commonly attained credits, differences were identified between consultant populations, and credit strategy patterns were demonstrated inherent in each progresssivly more demanding certification level. Water collection was unsuccessful, rendering water correlations impossible. Collection of energy consumption data were successful yet produced few statistically significant correlations. The study's results demonstrate to industry practitioners and researchers that the 69-point LEED NC rating system failed to demonstrate substantial correlations between energy use and credits within the Arizona population, thereby discounting energy conservation strategies inherent in LEED NC versions 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2. The results also highlight the need to incentivize those credits which produce the greatest environmental benefit throughout the building's full life cycle. The authors discuss energy correlations in greater detail in another publication.",
keywords = "Arizona, Building consumption, Energy consumption, LEED credits, Measurement, Postoccupancy survey, Sustainable development, U.S. Green Building Council, Water consumption",
author = "Kenneth Sullivan and Oates, {Hugo Dixon}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000525",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "138",
pages = "1386--1393",
journal = "Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9364",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of Arizona's LEED for new construction population's credits

AU - Sullivan, Kenneth

AU - Oates, Hugo Dixon

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Existing literature has failed to identify credit patterns amongst buildings that have achieved various certification levels within the leadership in energy and environmental design for new construction (LEED NC) rating system. Although credit scorecard information had been available for some LEED NC certified projects on the U.S. Green Building Council's (USGBC) website, no one had published a detailed credit analysis or overall credit trends. Furthermore, the few studies that correlated LEED credits with utility consumption returned null results. This technical paper examines LEED NC credit trends for 91% of Arizona's 53-building LEED NC building population in an effort to identify credit patterns and to determine if credits correlate with either water or power consumption. Data collection efforts were successful for all desired deliverables except water consumption. Credit patterns emerged, exhibiting the most and least commonly attained credits, differences were identified between consultant populations, and credit strategy patterns were demonstrated inherent in each progresssivly more demanding certification level. Water collection was unsuccessful, rendering water correlations impossible. Collection of energy consumption data were successful yet produced few statistically significant correlations. The study's results demonstrate to industry practitioners and researchers that the 69-point LEED NC rating system failed to demonstrate substantial correlations between energy use and credits within the Arizona population, thereby discounting energy conservation strategies inherent in LEED NC versions 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2. The results also highlight the need to incentivize those credits which produce the greatest environmental benefit throughout the building's full life cycle. The authors discuss energy correlations in greater detail in another publication.

AB - Existing literature has failed to identify credit patterns amongst buildings that have achieved various certification levels within the leadership in energy and environmental design for new construction (LEED NC) rating system. Although credit scorecard information had been available for some LEED NC certified projects on the U.S. Green Building Council's (USGBC) website, no one had published a detailed credit analysis or overall credit trends. Furthermore, the few studies that correlated LEED credits with utility consumption returned null results. This technical paper examines LEED NC credit trends for 91% of Arizona's 53-building LEED NC building population in an effort to identify credit patterns and to determine if credits correlate with either water or power consumption. Data collection efforts were successful for all desired deliverables except water consumption. Credit patterns emerged, exhibiting the most and least commonly attained credits, differences were identified between consultant populations, and credit strategy patterns were demonstrated inherent in each progresssivly more demanding certification level. Water collection was unsuccessful, rendering water correlations impossible. Collection of energy consumption data were successful yet produced few statistically significant correlations. The study's results demonstrate to industry practitioners and researchers that the 69-point LEED NC rating system failed to demonstrate substantial correlations between energy use and credits within the Arizona population, thereby discounting energy conservation strategies inherent in LEED NC versions 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2. The results also highlight the need to incentivize those credits which produce the greatest environmental benefit throughout the building's full life cycle. The authors discuss energy correlations in greater detail in another publication.

KW - Arizona

KW - Building consumption

KW - Energy consumption

KW - LEED credits

KW - Measurement

KW - Postoccupancy survey

KW - Sustainable development

KW - U.S. Green Building Council

KW - Water consumption

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870956603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870956603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000525

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000525

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84870956603

VL - 138

SP - 1386

EP - 1393

JO - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

JF - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

SN - 0733-9364

IS - 12

ER -