An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues

Justin B. Knight, J. Thadeus Meeks, Richard L. Marsh, Gabriel I. Cook, Gene Brewer, Jason L. Hicks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

In event-based prospective memory, current theories make differing predictions as to whether intention-related material can be spontaneously noticed (i.e., noticed without relying on preparatory attentional processes). In 2 experiments, participants formed an intention that was contextually associated to the final phase of the experiment, and lures that overlapped to differing degrees with the features of the intention-related cues were embedded in the initial phase. When participants were outside of the appropriate responding context (i.e., the initial phase), they exhibited slower latencies to lures that exactly matched the features of their intention compared with other types of lures and control words. In addition, on a final remember/know recognition test, participants reported having greater subjective recollection for the occurrence of the exact-match lures. These results suggest that exact-match lures were spontaneously noticed and differentially processed in the absence of any observable preparatory attentional processes. The findings have implications for the theoretical debate over whether preparatory attention must always be relied upon to notice intention-related material.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)298-307
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Keywords

  • Context effects
  • Lures
  • Preparatory attention
  • Prospective memory
  • Spontaneous noticing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this