An international nanoscience advisory board to improve and harmonize nanotechnology oversight

Gary Marchant, Andrew White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As governments around the world begin to implement regulations aimed at controlling nanotechnology, those regulations should be based upon the best available science, applied as consistently as possible within jurisdictions and, to the extent feasible, across jurisdictions. These goals would be easier to achieve with the creation of an international nanoscience advisory board. Such a body could be modeled on similar international scientific advisory bodies for other issues, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Such a body should also take into account lessons learned from these similar organizations. An international nanoscience advisory board could assist regulatory bodies by providing a central source of accurate scientific information about the risks and benefits of nanotechnology, including relevant uncertainties, rather than having each regulatory body make these determinations independently. An international nanoscience advisory board could facilitate harmonization within and between jurisdictions by involving the top experts in the field to produce a centralized knowledge base for regulatory decisions. While an international nanoscience advisory board presents many potential benefits, it also faces significant difficulties, which are best illustrated by examining the history and challenges of existing international science advisory bodies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1489-1498
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Nanoparticle Research
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Nanoscience
Nanotechnology
nanotechnology
Biodiversity
Climate Change
Ecosystem
Knowledge Base
Uncertainty
Climate change
Ecosystems
biological diversity
lessons learned
ecosystems
climate change
platforms
histories
Government
History
Policy

Keywords

  • Ethical
  • Governance
  • Legal
  • Nanotechnology
  • Science advisory boards
  • Scientific advice
  • Social issues

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Bioengineering

Cite this

An international nanoscience advisory board to improve and harmonize nanotechnology oversight. / Marchant, Gary; White, Andrew.

In: Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 1489-1498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{10ca4e8915c9476cb1b964aa919589b9,
title = "An international nanoscience advisory board to improve and harmonize nanotechnology oversight",
abstract = "As governments around the world begin to implement regulations aimed at controlling nanotechnology, those regulations should be based upon the best available science, applied as consistently as possible within jurisdictions and, to the extent feasible, across jurisdictions. These goals would be easier to achieve with the creation of an international nanoscience advisory board. Such a body could be modeled on similar international scientific advisory bodies for other issues, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Such a body should also take into account lessons learned from these similar organizations. An international nanoscience advisory board could assist regulatory bodies by providing a central source of accurate scientific information about the risks and benefits of nanotechnology, including relevant uncertainties, rather than having each regulatory body make these determinations independently. An international nanoscience advisory board could facilitate harmonization within and between jurisdictions by involving the top experts in the field to produce a centralized knowledge base for regulatory decisions. While an international nanoscience advisory board presents many potential benefits, it also faces significant difficulties, which are best illustrated by examining the history and challenges of existing international science advisory bodies.",
keywords = "Ethical, Governance, Legal, Nanotechnology, Science advisory boards, Scientific advice, Social issues",
author = "Gary Marchant and Andrew White",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s11051-011-0226-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1489--1498",
journal = "Journal of Nanoparticle Research",
issn = "1388-0764",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An international nanoscience advisory board to improve and harmonize nanotechnology oversight

AU - Marchant, Gary

AU - White, Andrew

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - As governments around the world begin to implement regulations aimed at controlling nanotechnology, those regulations should be based upon the best available science, applied as consistently as possible within jurisdictions and, to the extent feasible, across jurisdictions. These goals would be easier to achieve with the creation of an international nanoscience advisory board. Such a body could be modeled on similar international scientific advisory bodies for other issues, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Such a body should also take into account lessons learned from these similar organizations. An international nanoscience advisory board could assist regulatory bodies by providing a central source of accurate scientific information about the risks and benefits of nanotechnology, including relevant uncertainties, rather than having each regulatory body make these determinations independently. An international nanoscience advisory board could facilitate harmonization within and between jurisdictions by involving the top experts in the field to produce a centralized knowledge base for regulatory decisions. While an international nanoscience advisory board presents many potential benefits, it also faces significant difficulties, which are best illustrated by examining the history and challenges of existing international science advisory bodies.

AB - As governments around the world begin to implement regulations aimed at controlling nanotechnology, those regulations should be based upon the best available science, applied as consistently as possible within jurisdictions and, to the extent feasible, across jurisdictions. These goals would be easier to achieve with the creation of an international nanoscience advisory board. Such a body could be modeled on similar international scientific advisory bodies for other issues, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Such a body should also take into account lessons learned from these similar organizations. An international nanoscience advisory board could assist regulatory bodies by providing a central source of accurate scientific information about the risks and benefits of nanotechnology, including relevant uncertainties, rather than having each regulatory body make these determinations independently. An international nanoscience advisory board could facilitate harmonization within and between jurisdictions by involving the top experts in the field to produce a centralized knowledge base for regulatory decisions. While an international nanoscience advisory board presents many potential benefits, it also faces significant difficulties, which are best illustrated by examining the history and challenges of existing international science advisory bodies.

KW - Ethical

KW - Governance

KW - Legal

KW - Nanotechnology

KW - Science advisory boards

KW - Scientific advice

KW - Social issues

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956093721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956093721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11051-011-0226-1

DO - 10.1007/s11051-011-0226-1

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1489

EP - 1498

JO - Journal of Nanoparticle Research

JF - Journal of Nanoparticle Research

SN - 1388-0764

IS - 4

ER -