An indigenous view of the New World Order: Somalia and the ostensible rule of law

Pat Lauderdale, Pietro Toggia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the 'New World Order,' Somalia is characterized as a deviant society, especially by Western countries. This characterization is magnified by focusing upon armed conflicts among different groups in Somalia and is marked by a neglect of global forces and history, including indigenous perspectives. The benchmark for judging the nature and scale of such crises is the condition of statelessness, measured by the absence of a central political authority and the modern claim of an ostensible universal rule of law. However, the attempted replacement of sacred places and kinship identities of indigenous peoples with the identity of the New World Order that emphasizes self-interested and self-maximizing individuals, i.e., Western individualism, has led not to a melting pot, but a boiling pot. The Somalis, as with many other ethnic and indigenous groups throughout the world, do not find a meaningful sense of life by being defined as modern individuals via the state. Any viable alternative to disentangling Somalia and similar indigenous peoples from current and future crises might benefit from recognition and accomodation to their traditional ways of life and systems of governance. Moreover, future work should include explications of the impact of global hegemony, the increasing role of the United Nations in advancing foreign policy, military interventions under the facade of peacekeeping, and the acceleration of a market economy ostensibly directed by global forces such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-177
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Asian and African Studies
Volume34
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

new world order
Somalia
constitutional state
military intervention
peacekeeping
individualism
hegemony
kinship
foreign policy
IMF
World Bank
United Nations
statelessness
replacement
way of life
market economy
neglect
UNO
Group
history

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

An indigenous view of the New World Order : Somalia and the ostensible rule of law. / Lauderdale, Pat; Toggia, Pietro.

In: Journal of Asian and African Studies, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1999, p. 157-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{be857279228142fd862080ad3ee995ff,
title = "An indigenous view of the New World Order: Somalia and the ostensible rule of law",
abstract = "In the 'New World Order,' Somalia is characterized as a deviant society, especially by Western countries. This characterization is magnified by focusing upon armed conflicts among different groups in Somalia and is marked by a neglect of global forces and history, including indigenous perspectives. The benchmark for judging the nature and scale of such crises is the condition of statelessness, measured by the absence of a central political authority and the modern claim of an ostensible universal rule of law. However, the attempted replacement of sacred places and kinship identities of indigenous peoples with the identity of the New World Order that emphasizes self-interested and self-maximizing individuals, i.e., Western individualism, has led not to a melting pot, but a boiling pot. The Somalis, as with many other ethnic and indigenous groups throughout the world, do not find a meaningful sense of life by being defined as modern individuals via the state. Any viable alternative to disentangling Somalia and similar indigenous peoples from current and future crises might benefit from recognition and accomodation to their traditional ways of life and systems of governance. Moreover, future work should include explications of the impact of global hegemony, the increasing role of the United Nations in advancing foreign policy, military interventions under the facade of peacekeeping, and the acceleration of a market economy ostensibly directed by global forces such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.",
author = "Pat Lauderdale and Pietro Toggia",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "157--177",
journal = "Journal of Asian and African Studies",
issn = "0021-9096",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An indigenous view of the New World Order

T2 - Somalia and the ostensible rule of law

AU - Lauderdale, Pat

AU - Toggia, Pietro

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - In the 'New World Order,' Somalia is characterized as a deviant society, especially by Western countries. This characterization is magnified by focusing upon armed conflicts among different groups in Somalia and is marked by a neglect of global forces and history, including indigenous perspectives. The benchmark for judging the nature and scale of such crises is the condition of statelessness, measured by the absence of a central political authority and the modern claim of an ostensible universal rule of law. However, the attempted replacement of sacred places and kinship identities of indigenous peoples with the identity of the New World Order that emphasizes self-interested and self-maximizing individuals, i.e., Western individualism, has led not to a melting pot, but a boiling pot. The Somalis, as with many other ethnic and indigenous groups throughout the world, do not find a meaningful sense of life by being defined as modern individuals via the state. Any viable alternative to disentangling Somalia and similar indigenous peoples from current and future crises might benefit from recognition and accomodation to their traditional ways of life and systems of governance. Moreover, future work should include explications of the impact of global hegemony, the increasing role of the United Nations in advancing foreign policy, military interventions under the facade of peacekeeping, and the acceleration of a market economy ostensibly directed by global forces such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

AB - In the 'New World Order,' Somalia is characterized as a deviant society, especially by Western countries. This characterization is magnified by focusing upon armed conflicts among different groups in Somalia and is marked by a neglect of global forces and history, including indigenous perspectives. The benchmark for judging the nature and scale of such crises is the condition of statelessness, measured by the absence of a central political authority and the modern claim of an ostensible universal rule of law. However, the attempted replacement of sacred places and kinship identities of indigenous peoples with the identity of the New World Order that emphasizes self-interested and self-maximizing individuals, i.e., Western individualism, has led not to a melting pot, but a boiling pot. The Somalis, as with many other ethnic and indigenous groups throughout the world, do not find a meaningful sense of life by being defined as modern individuals via the state. Any viable alternative to disentangling Somalia and similar indigenous peoples from current and future crises might benefit from recognition and accomodation to their traditional ways of life and systems of governance. Moreover, future work should include explications of the impact of global hegemony, the increasing role of the United Nations in advancing foreign policy, military interventions under the facade of peacekeeping, and the acceleration of a market economy ostensibly directed by global forces such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032855918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032855918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032855918

VL - 34

SP - 157

EP - 177

JO - Journal of Asian and African Studies

JF - Journal of Asian and African Studies

SN - 0021-9096

IS - 2

ER -