An improved methodology for evaluating the producibility of partially specified part designs

Steven S. Aurand, Chell A. Roberts, Dan Shunk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Within the concurrent engineering (CE) paradigm, products must be designed in light of downstream lifecycle preferences and capabilities. One CE challenge is the need to estimate the downstream implications of partially specified part designs as early as possible in the design cycle. In this research, the hierarchical evaluation methodology for early design (HEMED) was developed to address this challenge for the fixed-principle design environment in the piece-part manufacturing industry. A prescriptive decision-modelling approach was used to develop this methodology. HEMED models a company's preferences and priorities using a weighted hierarchy of business objectives, and it uses utility scoring logic to evaluate a part design's performance relative to these priorities. Utility scores are aggregated in a bottom-up manner to generate the part design's HEMED rating, which consists of both a score and its associated uncertainty factor for each objective in the hierarchy. A prototype, proof-of-concept HEMED de sign-rating system was implemented and verified at a local aerospace manufacturing company. Several of the company's experienced production engineers believed that the HEMED prototype, while limited in scope, accurately represented their organization's preferences and priorities. They also believed that the prototype's test part ratings were accurate compared to their first-hand experience with these parts. HEMED was also compared to the other documented and validated early design evaluation methodology by a total of 28 engineers and technical managers from two aerospace manufacturing companies. For 11 of the 12 criteria that were used to rate the two methodologies, the evaluators believed that HEMED was an improvement within the fixed-principle design environment. This research demonstrated that HEMED was an improvement over the previously documented early design-rating system within the aerospace manufacturing industry. With additional testing, the researchers strongly believe that HEMED can be successfully applied and demonstrated as an improved early design evaluation approach throughout the piece-part manufacturing industry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-172
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing
Volume11
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Industry
Methodology
Concurrent engineering
Evaluation methodologies
Engineers
Managers
Testing
Prototype
Aerospace
Manufacturing industries
Manufacturing companies
Rating system
Rating
Design principles
Evaluation design
Business objectives
Relative performance
Paradigm
Life cycle
Logic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

An improved methodology for evaluating the producibility of partially specified part designs. / Aurand, Steven S.; Roberts, Chell A.; Shunk, Dan.

In: International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1998, p. 153-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7cddb72891247278ae74997cb8f0741,
title = "An improved methodology for evaluating the producibility of partially specified part designs",
abstract = "Within the concurrent engineering (CE) paradigm, products must be designed in light of downstream lifecycle preferences and capabilities. One CE challenge is the need to estimate the downstream implications of partially specified part designs as early as possible in the design cycle. In this research, the hierarchical evaluation methodology for early design (HEMED) was developed to address this challenge for the fixed-principle design environment in the piece-part manufacturing industry. A prescriptive decision-modelling approach was used to develop this methodology. HEMED models a company's preferences and priorities using a weighted hierarchy of business objectives, and it uses utility scoring logic to evaluate a part design's performance relative to these priorities. Utility scores are aggregated in a bottom-up manner to generate the part design's HEMED rating, which consists of both a score and its associated uncertainty factor for each objective in the hierarchy. A prototype, proof-of-concept HEMED de sign-rating system was implemented and verified at a local aerospace manufacturing company. Several of the company's experienced production engineers believed that the HEMED prototype, while limited in scope, accurately represented their organization's preferences and priorities. They also believed that the prototype's test part ratings were accurate compared to their first-hand experience with these parts. HEMED was also compared to the other documented and validated early design evaluation methodology by a total of 28 engineers and technical managers from two aerospace manufacturing companies. For 11 of the 12 criteria that were used to rate the two methodologies, the evaluators believed that HEMED was an improvement within the fixed-principle design environment. This research demonstrated that HEMED was an improvement over the previously documented early design-rating system within the aerospace manufacturing industry. With additional testing, the researchers strongly believe that HEMED can be successfully applied and demonstrated as an improved early design evaluation approach throughout the piece-part manufacturing industry.",
author = "Aurand, {Steven S.} and Roberts, {Chell A.} and Dan Shunk",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "153--172",
journal = "International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing",
issn = "0951-192X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An improved methodology for evaluating the producibility of partially specified part designs

AU - Aurand, Steven S.

AU - Roberts, Chell A.

AU - Shunk, Dan

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Within the concurrent engineering (CE) paradigm, products must be designed in light of downstream lifecycle preferences and capabilities. One CE challenge is the need to estimate the downstream implications of partially specified part designs as early as possible in the design cycle. In this research, the hierarchical evaluation methodology for early design (HEMED) was developed to address this challenge for the fixed-principle design environment in the piece-part manufacturing industry. A prescriptive decision-modelling approach was used to develop this methodology. HEMED models a company's preferences and priorities using a weighted hierarchy of business objectives, and it uses utility scoring logic to evaluate a part design's performance relative to these priorities. Utility scores are aggregated in a bottom-up manner to generate the part design's HEMED rating, which consists of both a score and its associated uncertainty factor for each objective in the hierarchy. A prototype, proof-of-concept HEMED de sign-rating system was implemented and verified at a local aerospace manufacturing company. Several of the company's experienced production engineers believed that the HEMED prototype, while limited in scope, accurately represented their organization's preferences and priorities. They also believed that the prototype's test part ratings were accurate compared to their first-hand experience with these parts. HEMED was also compared to the other documented and validated early design evaluation methodology by a total of 28 engineers and technical managers from two aerospace manufacturing companies. For 11 of the 12 criteria that were used to rate the two methodologies, the evaluators believed that HEMED was an improvement within the fixed-principle design environment. This research demonstrated that HEMED was an improvement over the previously documented early design-rating system within the aerospace manufacturing industry. With additional testing, the researchers strongly believe that HEMED can be successfully applied and demonstrated as an improved early design evaluation approach throughout the piece-part manufacturing industry.

AB - Within the concurrent engineering (CE) paradigm, products must be designed in light of downstream lifecycle preferences and capabilities. One CE challenge is the need to estimate the downstream implications of partially specified part designs as early as possible in the design cycle. In this research, the hierarchical evaluation methodology for early design (HEMED) was developed to address this challenge for the fixed-principle design environment in the piece-part manufacturing industry. A prescriptive decision-modelling approach was used to develop this methodology. HEMED models a company's preferences and priorities using a weighted hierarchy of business objectives, and it uses utility scoring logic to evaluate a part design's performance relative to these priorities. Utility scores are aggregated in a bottom-up manner to generate the part design's HEMED rating, which consists of both a score and its associated uncertainty factor for each objective in the hierarchy. A prototype, proof-of-concept HEMED de sign-rating system was implemented and verified at a local aerospace manufacturing company. Several of the company's experienced production engineers believed that the HEMED prototype, while limited in scope, accurately represented their organization's preferences and priorities. They also believed that the prototype's test part ratings were accurate compared to their first-hand experience with these parts. HEMED was also compared to the other documented and validated early design evaluation methodology by a total of 28 engineers and technical managers from two aerospace manufacturing companies. For 11 of the 12 criteria that were used to rate the two methodologies, the evaluators believed that HEMED was an improvement within the fixed-principle design environment. This research demonstrated that HEMED was an improvement over the previously documented early design-rating system within the aerospace manufacturing industry. With additional testing, the researchers strongly believe that HEMED can be successfully applied and demonstrated as an improved early design evaluation approach throughout the piece-part manufacturing industry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000334490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000334490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 153

EP - 172

JO - International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

JF - International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

SN - 0951-192X

IS - 2

ER -