An examination of the effect of inquiry and auditor type on reporting intentions for fraud

Steven Kaplan, Kelly Richmond Pope, Janet A. Samuels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Employee tips are the most common form of initial fraud detection, suggesting that employees frequently are aware of fraud before others professionally charged to detect fraud, such as internal and external auditors. Given the seriousness of fraud to a range of stakeholders, it is important to increase our understanding of the willingness of employees who learn about fraud to report this information to auditors. We conduct an experimental study describing a hypothetical situation involving an employee's discovery of a fraudulent act by his supervisor. Given the hypothetical situation, participants, assuming they were facing the situation, provide their intentions to report fraud to an auditor. The study examines several issues related to participants' intentions to report fraud to auditors. First, we predict and find that participants' reporting intentions to an inquiring auditor are stronger than their reporting intentions to a noninquiring auditor. Second, we predict and find that participants' reporting intentions to an internal auditor are stronger than their reporting intentions to an external auditor. Third, based on contrast coding results, we predict and find that inquiry and auditor type interact to influence reporting intentions. Fourth, we find that reporting intentions for two different types of fraudulent acts, misappropriation of assets and fraudulent financial reporting, do not significantly differ, nor does the type of fraudulent act interact with whether the auditor engages in inquiry or the report recipient (e.g., internal versus external auditor). Supplemental analysis provides additional information on the extent to which beliefs differ between the two types of fraudulent acts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-49
Number of pages21
JournalAuditing
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Fraud
Auditors
Employees
External auditor
Fraud detection
Supervisors
Stakeholders
Willingness
Experimental study
Financial reporting
Assets

Keywords

  • Auditor inquiry
  • Fraudulent financial reporting
  • Misappropriation of assets
  • Reporting intentions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Accounting
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

An examination of the effect of inquiry and auditor type on reporting intentions for fraud. / Kaplan, Steven; Pope, Kelly Richmond; Samuels, Janet A.

In: Auditing, Vol. 30, No. 4, 11.2011, p. 29-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kaplan, Steven ; Pope, Kelly Richmond ; Samuels, Janet A. / An examination of the effect of inquiry and auditor type on reporting intentions for fraud. In: Auditing. 2011 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 29-49.
@article{bde1a4d6455a42d08447bb1e3e15aa68,
title = "An examination of the effect of inquiry and auditor type on reporting intentions for fraud",
abstract = "Employee tips are the most common form of initial fraud detection, suggesting that employees frequently are aware of fraud before others professionally charged to detect fraud, such as internal and external auditors. Given the seriousness of fraud to a range of stakeholders, it is important to increase our understanding of the willingness of employees who learn about fraud to report this information to auditors. We conduct an experimental study describing a hypothetical situation involving an employee's discovery of a fraudulent act by his supervisor. Given the hypothetical situation, participants, assuming they were facing the situation, provide their intentions to report fraud to an auditor. The study examines several issues related to participants' intentions to report fraud to auditors. First, we predict and find that participants' reporting intentions to an inquiring auditor are stronger than their reporting intentions to a noninquiring auditor. Second, we predict and find that participants' reporting intentions to an internal auditor are stronger than their reporting intentions to an external auditor. Third, based on contrast coding results, we predict and find that inquiry and auditor type interact to influence reporting intentions. Fourth, we find that reporting intentions for two different types of fraudulent acts, misappropriation of assets and fraudulent financial reporting, do not significantly differ, nor does the type of fraudulent act interact with whether the auditor engages in inquiry or the report recipient (e.g., internal versus external auditor). Supplemental analysis provides additional information on the extent to which beliefs differ between the two types of fraudulent acts.",
keywords = "Auditor inquiry, Fraudulent financial reporting, Misappropriation of assets, Reporting intentions",
author = "Steven Kaplan and Pope, {Kelly Richmond} and Samuels, {Janet A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.2308/ajpt-10174",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "29--49",
journal = "Auditing",
issn = "0278-0380",
publisher = "American Accounting Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An examination of the effect of inquiry and auditor type on reporting intentions for fraud

AU - Kaplan, Steven

AU - Pope, Kelly Richmond

AU - Samuels, Janet A.

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Employee tips are the most common form of initial fraud detection, suggesting that employees frequently are aware of fraud before others professionally charged to detect fraud, such as internal and external auditors. Given the seriousness of fraud to a range of stakeholders, it is important to increase our understanding of the willingness of employees who learn about fraud to report this information to auditors. We conduct an experimental study describing a hypothetical situation involving an employee's discovery of a fraudulent act by his supervisor. Given the hypothetical situation, participants, assuming they were facing the situation, provide their intentions to report fraud to an auditor. The study examines several issues related to participants' intentions to report fraud to auditors. First, we predict and find that participants' reporting intentions to an inquiring auditor are stronger than their reporting intentions to a noninquiring auditor. Second, we predict and find that participants' reporting intentions to an internal auditor are stronger than their reporting intentions to an external auditor. Third, based on contrast coding results, we predict and find that inquiry and auditor type interact to influence reporting intentions. Fourth, we find that reporting intentions for two different types of fraudulent acts, misappropriation of assets and fraudulent financial reporting, do not significantly differ, nor does the type of fraudulent act interact with whether the auditor engages in inquiry or the report recipient (e.g., internal versus external auditor). Supplemental analysis provides additional information on the extent to which beliefs differ between the two types of fraudulent acts.

AB - Employee tips are the most common form of initial fraud detection, suggesting that employees frequently are aware of fraud before others professionally charged to detect fraud, such as internal and external auditors. Given the seriousness of fraud to a range of stakeholders, it is important to increase our understanding of the willingness of employees who learn about fraud to report this information to auditors. We conduct an experimental study describing a hypothetical situation involving an employee's discovery of a fraudulent act by his supervisor. Given the hypothetical situation, participants, assuming they were facing the situation, provide their intentions to report fraud to an auditor. The study examines several issues related to participants' intentions to report fraud to auditors. First, we predict and find that participants' reporting intentions to an inquiring auditor are stronger than their reporting intentions to a noninquiring auditor. Second, we predict and find that participants' reporting intentions to an internal auditor are stronger than their reporting intentions to an external auditor. Third, based on contrast coding results, we predict and find that inquiry and auditor type interact to influence reporting intentions. Fourth, we find that reporting intentions for two different types of fraudulent acts, misappropriation of assets and fraudulent financial reporting, do not significantly differ, nor does the type of fraudulent act interact with whether the auditor engages in inquiry or the report recipient (e.g., internal versus external auditor). Supplemental analysis provides additional information on the extent to which beliefs differ between the two types of fraudulent acts.

KW - Auditor inquiry

KW - Fraudulent financial reporting

KW - Misappropriation of assets

KW - Reporting intentions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82355161242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82355161242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2308/ajpt-10174

DO - 10.2308/ajpt-10174

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:82355161242

VL - 30

SP - 29

EP - 49

JO - Auditing

JF - Auditing

SN - 0278-0380

IS - 4

ER -