An examination of tax professionals' judgments

The role of experience, client condition and reciprocal obligation

David Lowe, Philip Reckers, Robert W. Wyndelts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In spite of the expanding role of tax preparers in the tax reporting process, very little research has been directed at how tax preparers make tax-related decisions. This study extends prior research by using tax preparers as opposed to taxpayers as subjects. The judgment of tax preparers presumably can be influenced by three categories of factors: 1) factors relating to the law and regulatory environment, 2) individual differences between professionals, and 3) differences across clients and client conditions. This research has focused on the second and third categories of influence. Individual differences examined were experience, ethical disposition and fear of reprisals related to tax preparer penalties. Client related influences examined were reciprocity demands of an aggressive client and year-end client overpayment/underpayment tax position. The subjects in our study indicated significant reticence to recommend an aggressive (yet supportable) position to a client noted to want to follow an aggressive strategy. Further, experienced tax professionals indicated resistance to client condition pressures-underpayment tax status and reciprocity pressure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-357
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Business and Psychology
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1993

Fingerprint

Individuality
Research
Pressure
Taxes
Fear
Professional judgment
Tax
Obligation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

@article{2cf010bdca754f4e9e1124e43cdf6cdc,
title = "An examination of tax professionals' judgments: The role of experience, client condition and reciprocal obligation",
abstract = "In spite of the expanding role of tax preparers in the tax reporting process, very little research has been directed at how tax preparers make tax-related decisions. This study extends prior research by using tax preparers as opposed to taxpayers as subjects. The judgment of tax preparers presumably can be influenced by three categories of factors: 1) factors relating to the law and regulatory environment, 2) individual differences between professionals, and 3) differences across clients and client conditions. This research has focused on the second and third categories of influence. Individual differences examined were experience, ethical disposition and fear of reprisals related to tax preparer penalties. Client related influences examined were reciprocity demands of an aggressive client and year-end client overpayment/underpayment tax position. The subjects in our study indicated significant reticence to recommend an aggressive (yet supportable) position to a client noted to want to follow an aggressive strategy. Further, experienced tax professionals indicated resistance to client condition pressures-underpayment tax status and reciprocity pressure.",
author = "David Lowe and Philip Reckers and Wyndelts, {Robert W.}",
year = "1993",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/BF01015759",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "341--357",
journal = "Journal of Business and Psychology",
issn = "0889-3268",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic/Human Sciences Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An examination of tax professionals' judgments

T2 - The role of experience, client condition and reciprocal obligation

AU - Lowe, David

AU - Reckers, Philip

AU - Wyndelts, Robert W.

PY - 1993/3

Y1 - 1993/3

N2 - In spite of the expanding role of tax preparers in the tax reporting process, very little research has been directed at how tax preparers make tax-related decisions. This study extends prior research by using tax preparers as opposed to taxpayers as subjects. The judgment of tax preparers presumably can be influenced by three categories of factors: 1) factors relating to the law and regulatory environment, 2) individual differences between professionals, and 3) differences across clients and client conditions. This research has focused on the second and third categories of influence. Individual differences examined were experience, ethical disposition and fear of reprisals related to tax preparer penalties. Client related influences examined were reciprocity demands of an aggressive client and year-end client overpayment/underpayment tax position. The subjects in our study indicated significant reticence to recommend an aggressive (yet supportable) position to a client noted to want to follow an aggressive strategy. Further, experienced tax professionals indicated resistance to client condition pressures-underpayment tax status and reciprocity pressure.

AB - In spite of the expanding role of tax preparers in the tax reporting process, very little research has been directed at how tax preparers make tax-related decisions. This study extends prior research by using tax preparers as opposed to taxpayers as subjects. The judgment of tax preparers presumably can be influenced by three categories of factors: 1) factors relating to the law and regulatory environment, 2) individual differences between professionals, and 3) differences across clients and client conditions. This research has focused on the second and third categories of influence. Individual differences examined were experience, ethical disposition and fear of reprisals related to tax preparer penalties. Client related influences examined were reciprocity demands of an aggressive client and year-end client overpayment/underpayment tax position. The subjects in our study indicated significant reticence to recommend an aggressive (yet supportable) position to a client noted to want to follow an aggressive strategy. Further, experienced tax professionals indicated resistance to client condition pressures-underpayment tax status and reciprocity pressure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250082758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250082758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01015759

DO - 10.1007/BF01015759

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 341

EP - 357

JO - Journal of Business and Psychology

JF - Journal of Business and Psychology

SN - 0889-3268

IS - 3

ER -