An examination of how voters form impressions of candidates' issue positions during the nomination campaign

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that issues influence voter preferences during the nomination campaign (Bartels, 1985; Bartels, 1988); however, only Bartels (1988) and Conover and Feldman (1986, 1989) have examined how partisans forge perceptions of candidates' positions on issues prior to the general election campaign. The goal of this paper, then, is to examine how individuals develop perceptions of candidates' issue positions during the crucial months leading to the nominating conventions. Relying on theories developed in social-psychology, I tested five competing hypotheses known to influence individuals' perceptions of candidates' issue positions. An examination of the findings revealed that there is strong support for one of the hypotheses and modest support for three additional hypotheses. In summary, it appears that voters are quite ingenious in forming impressions of where candidates stand on the issues. They rely on stored information about politics, they actually adjust candidates' true positions to relieve cognitive inconsistencies, they evoke their own issue positions to assume candidates they like agree with them and candidates they dislike disagree with them, and finally they evoke their own issue positions to assume candidates agree with them even when they hold no sentiment toward the candidate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-288
Number of pages24
JournalPolitical Behavior
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1993

Fingerprint

candidacy
campaign
examination
election campaign
social psychology
voter
politics
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

An examination of how voters form impressions of candidates' issue positions during the nomination campaign. / Kenney, Patrick.

In: Political Behavior, Vol. 15, No. 3, 09.1993, p. 265-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{35f6a90195074ef7b677112c5c90985d,
title = "An examination of how voters form impressions of candidates' issue positions during the nomination campaign",
abstract = "There is increasing evidence that issues influence voter preferences during the nomination campaign (Bartels, 1985; Bartels, 1988); however, only Bartels (1988) and Conover and Feldman (1986, 1989) have examined how partisans forge perceptions of candidates' positions on issues prior to the general election campaign. The goal of this paper, then, is to examine how individuals develop perceptions of candidates' issue positions during the crucial months leading to the nominating conventions. Relying on theories developed in social-psychology, I tested five competing hypotheses known to influence individuals' perceptions of candidates' issue positions. An examination of the findings revealed that there is strong support for one of the hypotheses and modest support for three additional hypotheses. In summary, it appears that voters are quite ingenious in forming impressions of where candidates stand on the issues. They rely on stored information about politics, they actually adjust candidates' true positions to relieve cognitive inconsistencies, they evoke their own issue positions to assume candidates they like agree with them and candidates they dislike disagree with them, and finally they evoke their own issue positions to assume candidates agree with them even when they hold no sentiment toward the candidate.",
author = "Patrick Kenney",
year = "1993",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/BF00993438",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "265--288",
journal = "Political Behavior",
issn = "0190-9320",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An examination of how voters form impressions of candidates' issue positions during the nomination campaign

AU - Kenney, Patrick

PY - 1993/9

Y1 - 1993/9

N2 - There is increasing evidence that issues influence voter preferences during the nomination campaign (Bartels, 1985; Bartels, 1988); however, only Bartels (1988) and Conover and Feldman (1986, 1989) have examined how partisans forge perceptions of candidates' positions on issues prior to the general election campaign. The goal of this paper, then, is to examine how individuals develop perceptions of candidates' issue positions during the crucial months leading to the nominating conventions. Relying on theories developed in social-psychology, I tested five competing hypotheses known to influence individuals' perceptions of candidates' issue positions. An examination of the findings revealed that there is strong support for one of the hypotheses and modest support for three additional hypotheses. In summary, it appears that voters are quite ingenious in forming impressions of where candidates stand on the issues. They rely on stored information about politics, they actually adjust candidates' true positions to relieve cognitive inconsistencies, they evoke their own issue positions to assume candidates they like agree with them and candidates they dislike disagree with them, and finally they evoke their own issue positions to assume candidates agree with them even when they hold no sentiment toward the candidate.

AB - There is increasing evidence that issues influence voter preferences during the nomination campaign (Bartels, 1985; Bartels, 1988); however, only Bartels (1988) and Conover and Feldman (1986, 1989) have examined how partisans forge perceptions of candidates' positions on issues prior to the general election campaign. The goal of this paper, then, is to examine how individuals develop perceptions of candidates' issue positions during the crucial months leading to the nominating conventions. Relying on theories developed in social-psychology, I tested five competing hypotheses known to influence individuals' perceptions of candidates' issue positions. An examination of the findings revealed that there is strong support for one of the hypotheses and modest support for three additional hypotheses. In summary, it appears that voters are quite ingenious in forming impressions of where candidates stand on the issues. They rely on stored information about politics, they actually adjust candidates' true positions to relieve cognitive inconsistencies, they evoke their own issue positions to assume candidates they like agree with them and candidates they dislike disagree with them, and finally they evoke their own issue positions to assume candidates agree with them even when they hold no sentiment toward the candidate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011556641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011556641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00993438

DO - 10.1007/BF00993438

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0011556641

VL - 15

SP - 265

EP - 288

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

SN - 0190-9320

IS - 3

ER -