An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws

Denise Pumain, Fabien Paulus, Céline Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, Jose Lobo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We try here to illustrate the relevance of an evolutionary theory of urban systems for explaining their hierarchical properties. The largest cities became larger because they were successful in adopting many successive innovations. Larger cities capture innovations in a continuous way (through adaptation, imitation, anticipation), and they concentrate a larger part of anything «new» at any time. Their functions demonstrate a higher level of complexity or sophistication of their urban activity and society. The most advanced technologies concentrate in largest cities, the common place activities are ubiquitous, whereas old ones remain in small towns only (or, in economic terms, there are increasing, constant or decreasing returns to urban scale). Such regularities can be expressed in the form of scaling laws that were recognised as revealing specific constraints on the structure and evolution of complex systems in physics and biology. Approaching urban activities by scaling laws provides a linkage between the concepts of urban function, city size, and innovation cycles. Over time, there is a substitution among the activities of the largest cities, where the oldest technologies and professions are replaced by the new ones, while the old ones are relatively concentrating in the smallest towns. Such an evolution is observed within urban systems where cities are fully connected and interdependent. There are processes of cooperation through exchanges of information and learning that enable an incremental diffusion of innovation and a continuous adaptation of urban activities and society in all parts of the system. Meanwhile, there are also processes of competition between cities that enhance their capacity to innovate and to levy the benefits of innovation. A distributed process of urban growth including a slight but continuing advantage for the largest cities is the result of that competitive process, while the successive adaptation of the urban functions follows the economic and social innovation cycles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalCyberGeo
Volume2006
StatePublished - Sep 25 2006

Fingerprint

evolutionary theory
scaling
large city
innovation
Law
small town
imitation
regularity
substitution
physics
economics
biology
profession
learning

Keywords

  • Evolutionary theory
  • Innovation cycles
  • Scaling laws
  • Urban functions
  • Urban system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Pumain, D., Paulus, F., Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, C., & Lobo, J. (2006). An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws. CyberGeo, 2006, 1-20.

An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws. / Pumain, Denise; Paulus, Fabien; Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, Céline; Lobo, Jose.

In: CyberGeo, Vol. 2006, 25.09.2006, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pumain, D, Paulus, F, Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, C & Lobo, J 2006, 'An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws', CyberGeo, vol. 2006, pp. 1-20.
Pumain D, Paulus F, Vacchiani-Marcuzzo C, Lobo J. An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws. CyberGeo. 2006 Sep 25;2006:1-20.
Pumain, Denise ; Paulus, Fabien ; Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, Céline ; Lobo, Jose. / An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws. In: CyberGeo. 2006 ; Vol. 2006. pp. 1-20.
@article{adf1acfbd6724da68793d3d61c9da481,
title = "An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws",
abstract = "We try here to illustrate the relevance of an evolutionary theory of urban systems for explaining their hierarchical properties. The largest cities became larger because they were successful in adopting many successive innovations. Larger cities capture innovations in a continuous way (through adaptation, imitation, anticipation), and they concentrate a larger part of anything «new» at any time. Their functions demonstrate a higher level of complexity or sophistication of their urban activity and society. The most advanced technologies concentrate in largest cities, the common place activities are ubiquitous, whereas old ones remain in small towns only (or, in economic terms, there are increasing, constant or decreasing returns to urban scale). Such regularities can be expressed in the form of scaling laws that were recognised as revealing specific constraints on the structure and evolution of complex systems in physics and biology. Approaching urban activities by scaling laws provides a linkage between the concepts of urban function, city size, and innovation cycles. Over time, there is a substitution among the activities of the largest cities, where the oldest technologies and professions are replaced by the new ones, while the old ones are relatively concentrating in the smallest towns. Such an evolution is observed within urban systems where cities are fully connected and interdependent. There are processes of cooperation through exchanges of information and learning that enable an incremental diffusion of innovation and a continuous adaptation of urban activities and society in all parts of the system. Meanwhile, there are also processes of competition between cities that enhance their capacity to innovate and to levy the benefits of innovation. A distributed process of urban growth including a slight but continuing advantage for the largest cities is the result of that competitive process, while the successive adaptation of the urban functions follows the economic and social innovation cycles.",
keywords = "Evolutionary theory, Innovation cycles, Scaling laws, Urban functions, Urban system",
author = "Denise Pumain and Fabien Paulus and C{\'e}line Vacchiani-Marcuzzo and Jose Lobo",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "25",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2006",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "CyberGeo",
issn = "1278-3366",
publisher = "Geographie-Cites",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws

AU - Pumain, Denise

AU - Paulus, Fabien

AU - Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, Céline

AU - Lobo, Jose

PY - 2006/9/25

Y1 - 2006/9/25

N2 - We try here to illustrate the relevance of an evolutionary theory of urban systems for explaining their hierarchical properties. The largest cities became larger because they were successful in adopting many successive innovations. Larger cities capture innovations in a continuous way (through adaptation, imitation, anticipation), and they concentrate a larger part of anything «new» at any time. Their functions demonstrate a higher level of complexity or sophistication of their urban activity and society. The most advanced technologies concentrate in largest cities, the common place activities are ubiquitous, whereas old ones remain in small towns only (or, in economic terms, there are increasing, constant or decreasing returns to urban scale). Such regularities can be expressed in the form of scaling laws that were recognised as revealing specific constraints on the structure and evolution of complex systems in physics and biology. Approaching urban activities by scaling laws provides a linkage between the concepts of urban function, city size, and innovation cycles. Over time, there is a substitution among the activities of the largest cities, where the oldest technologies and professions are replaced by the new ones, while the old ones are relatively concentrating in the smallest towns. Such an evolution is observed within urban systems where cities are fully connected and interdependent. There are processes of cooperation through exchanges of information and learning that enable an incremental diffusion of innovation and a continuous adaptation of urban activities and society in all parts of the system. Meanwhile, there are also processes of competition between cities that enhance their capacity to innovate and to levy the benefits of innovation. A distributed process of urban growth including a slight but continuing advantage for the largest cities is the result of that competitive process, while the successive adaptation of the urban functions follows the economic and social innovation cycles.

AB - We try here to illustrate the relevance of an evolutionary theory of urban systems for explaining their hierarchical properties. The largest cities became larger because they were successful in adopting many successive innovations. Larger cities capture innovations in a continuous way (through adaptation, imitation, anticipation), and they concentrate a larger part of anything «new» at any time. Their functions demonstrate a higher level of complexity or sophistication of their urban activity and society. The most advanced technologies concentrate in largest cities, the common place activities are ubiquitous, whereas old ones remain in small towns only (or, in economic terms, there are increasing, constant or decreasing returns to urban scale). Such regularities can be expressed in the form of scaling laws that were recognised as revealing specific constraints on the structure and evolution of complex systems in physics and biology. Approaching urban activities by scaling laws provides a linkage between the concepts of urban function, city size, and innovation cycles. Over time, there is a substitution among the activities of the largest cities, where the oldest technologies and professions are replaced by the new ones, while the old ones are relatively concentrating in the smallest towns. Such an evolution is observed within urban systems where cities are fully connected and interdependent. There are processes of cooperation through exchanges of information and learning that enable an incremental diffusion of innovation and a continuous adaptation of urban activities and society in all parts of the system. Meanwhile, there are also processes of competition between cities that enhance their capacity to innovate and to levy the benefits of innovation. A distributed process of urban growth including a slight but continuing advantage for the largest cities is the result of that competitive process, while the successive adaptation of the urban functions follows the economic and social innovation cycles.

KW - Evolutionary theory

KW - Innovation cycles

KW - Scaling laws

KW - Urban functions

KW - Urban system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748799696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748799696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748799696

VL - 2006

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - CyberGeo

JF - CyberGeo

SN - 1278-3366

ER -