An evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's clinical reminders system: A national survey of generalists

Constance H. Fung, Jerry S. Tsai, Armine Lulejian, Peter Glassman, Emily Patterson, Bradley Doebbeling, Steven M. Asch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is a leader in developing computerized clinical reminders (CCRs). Primary care physicians' (PCPs) evaluation of VHA CCRs could influence their future development and use within and outside the VHA. OBJECTIVE: Survey PCPs about usefulness and usability of VHA CCRs. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: In a national survey, VHA PCPs rated on a 7-point scale usefulness and usability of VHA CCRs, and standardized scales (0-100) were constructed. A hierarchical linear mixed (HLM) model predicted physician- and facility-level variables associated with more positive global assessment of CCRs. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-one PCPs participated (response rate, 69%). Scale Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.62 to 0.82. Perceptions of VHA CCRs were primarily in the midrange, where higher ratings indicate more favorable attitudes (weighted standardized median, IQR): global assessment (50, 28-61), clinical/situational specificity (29, 17-42), integration with workflow/workload (39, 17-50), training (50, 33-67), VHA's management of CCR use (67, 50-83), design/interface (53, 40-67), perceived role in CCR use (67, 50-83), and self-efficacy (67, 57-78). In a HLM model, design/interface (p

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)392-398
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reminder Systems
Veterans Health
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Primary Care Physicians
Linear Models
Workflow
Self Efficacy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Workload
Physicians

Keywords

  • Decision support systems clinical
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Medical records systems computerized
  • Primary health care
  • Quality of health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

An evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's clinical reminders system : A national survey of generalists. / Fung, Constance H.; Tsai, Jerry S.; Lulejian, Armine; Glassman, Peter; Patterson, Emily; Doebbeling, Bradley; Asch, Steven M.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 392-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fung, Constance H. ; Tsai, Jerry S. ; Lulejian, Armine ; Glassman, Peter ; Patterson, Emily ; Doebbeling, Bradley ; Asch, Steven M. / An evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's clinical reminders system : A national survey of generalists. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 392-398.
@article{6aa174961e734809b756dbf449de6817,
title = "An evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's clinical reminders system: A national survey of generalists",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is a leader in developing computerized clinical reminders (CCRs). Primary care physicians' (PCPs) evaluation of VHA CCRs could influence their future development and use within and outside the VHA. OBJECTIVE: Survey PCPs about usefulness and usability of VHA CCRs. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: In a national survey, VHA PCPs rated on a 7-point scale usefulness and usability of VHA CCRs, and standardized scales (0-100) were constructed. A hierarchical linear mixed (HLM) model predicted physician- and facility-level variables associated with more positive global assessment of CCRs. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-one PCPs participated (response rate, 69{\%}). Scale Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.62 to 0.82. Perceptions of VHA CCRs were primarily in the midrange, where higher ratings indicate more favorable attitudes (weighted standardized median, IQR): global assessment (50, 28-61), clinical/situational specificity (29, 17-42), integration with workflow/workload (39, 17-50), training (50, 33-67), VHA's management of CCR use (67, 50-83), design/interface (53, 40-67), perceived role in CCR use (67, 50-83), and self-efficacy (67, 57-78). In a HLM model, design/interface (p",
keywords = "Decision support systems clinical, Evidence-based medicine, Medical records systems computerized, Primary health care, Quality of health care",
author = "Fung, {Constance H.} and Tsai, {Jerry S.} and Armine Lulejian and Peter Glassman and Emily Patterson and Bradley Doebbeling and Asch, {Steven M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-007-0417-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "392--398",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's clinical reminders system

T2 - A national survey of generalists

AU - Fung, Constance H.

AU - Tsai, Jerry S.

AU - Lulejian, Armine

AU - Glassman, Peter

AU - Patterson, Emily

AU - Doebbeling, Bradley

AU - Asch, Steven M.

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is a leader in developing computerized clinical reminders (CCRs). Primary care physicians' (PCPs) evaluation of VHA CCRs could influence their future development and use within and outside the VHA. OBJECTIVE: Survey PCPs about usefulness and usability of VHA CCRs. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: In a national survey, VHA PCPs rated on a 7-point scale usefulness and usability of VHA CCRs, and standardized scales (0-100) were constructed. A hierarchical linear mixed (HLM) model predicted physician- and facility-level variables associated with more positive global assessment of CCRs. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-one PCPs participated (response rate, 69%). Scale Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.62 to 0.82. Perceptions of VHA CCRs were primarily in the midrange, where higher ratings indicate more favorable attitudes (weighted standardized median, IQR): global assessment (50, 28-61), clinical/situational specificity (29, 17-42), integration with workflow/workload (39, 17-50), training (50, 33-67), VHA's management of CCR use (67, 50-83), design/interface (53, 40-67), perceived role in CCR use (67, 50-83), and self-efficacy (67, 57-78). In a HLM model, design/interface (p

AB - BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is a leader in developing computerized clinical reminders (CCRs). Primary care physicians' (PCPs) evaluation of VHA CCRs could influence their future development and use within and outside the VHA. OBJECTIVE: Survey PCPs about usefulness and usability of VHA CCRs. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: In a national survey, VHA PCPs rated on a 7-point scale usefulness and usability of VHA CCRs, and standardized scales (0-100) were constructed. A hierarchical linear mixed (HLM) model predicted physician- and facility-level variables associated with more positive global assessment of CCRs. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-one PCPs participated (response rate, 69%). Scale Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.62 to 0.82. Perceptions of VHA CCRs were primarily in the midrange, where higher ratings indicate more favorable attitudes (weighted standardized median, IQR): global assessment (50, 28-61), clinical/situational specificity (29, 17-42), integration with workflow/workload (39, 17-50), training (50, 33-67), VHA's management of CCR use (67, 50-83), design/interface (53, 40-67), perceived role in CCR use (67, 50-83), and self-efficacy (67, 57-78). In a HLM model, design/interface (p

KW - Decision support systems clinical

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Medical records systems computerized

KW - Primary health care

KW - Quality of health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41549135617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41549135617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-007-0417-8

DO - 10.1007/s11606-007-0417-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 18373135

AN - SCOPUS:41549135617

VL - 23

SP - 392

EP - 398

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 4

ER -