An empirical test of the theory of relationship constraints

Gregory S. Dawson, Richard T. Watson, Marie Claude Boudreau

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Agency theory has long been a stalwart of IS research and is one of the most commonly used lenses to study the relationship between a principal and an agent. The Theory of Relationship Constraints (TRC) has recently been recommended as an information-oriented alternative to agency theory. TRC suggests that three attributes (i.e., the level of information asymmetry, levels of tacit and explicit knowledge) affect the perceived efficacy of a relationship constraint. As the first empirical test of TRC, this study uses scenario analysis to show that, as these attributes change, so do the constraints that are perceived as effective. No single constraint, as predicted, is perceived to be universally effective. Under certain conditions, social versus legal constraints have greater perceived efficacy, but this varies with the three attributes. This research provides support for TRC and suggests insights for future research and current practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInternational Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011
Pages2364-2379
Number of pages16
Volume3
StatePublished - 2011
Event32nd International Conference on Information System 2011, ICIS 2011 - Shanghai, China
Duration: Dec 4 2011Dec 7 2011

Other

Other32nd International Conference on Information System 2011, ICIS 2011
CountryChina
CityShanghai
Period12/4/1112/7/11

Fingerprint

Lenses

Keywords

  • Agency theory
  • Empirical research
  • IS consulting
  • Legal constraints
  • Scenario research
  • Social constraints
  • Theory of relationship constraints
  • Theory testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems

Cite this

Dawson, G. S., Watson, R. T., & Boudreau, M. C. (2011). An empirical test of the theory of relationship constraints. In International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011 (Vol. 3, pp. 2364-2379)

An empirical test of the theory of relationship constraints. / Dawson, Gregory S.; Watson, Richard T.; Boudreau, Marie Claude.

International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011. Vol. 3 2011. p. 2364-2379.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Dawson, GS, Watson, RT & Boudreau, MC 2011, An empirical test of the theory of relationship constraints. in International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011. vol. 3, pp. 2364-2379, 32nd International Conference on Information System 2011, ICIS 2011, Shanghai, China, 12/4/11.
Dawson GS, Watson RT, Boudreau MC. An empirical test of the theory of relationship constraints. In International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011. Vol. 3. 2011. p. 2364-2379
Dawson, Gregory S. ; Watson, Richard T. ; Boudreau, Marie Claude. / An empirical test of the theory of relationship constraints. International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011. Vol. 3 2011. pp. 2364-2379
@inproceedings{4a11f0255e044e158108d0a5f1b7b216,
title = "An empirical test of the theory of relationship constraints",
abstract = "Agency theory has long been a stalwart of IS research and is one of the most commonly used lenses to study the relationship between a principal and an agent. The Theory of Relationship Constraints (TRC) has recently been recommended as an information-oriented alternative to agency theory. TRC suggests that three attributes (i.e., the level of information asymmetry, levels of tacit and explicit knowledge) affect the perceived efficacy of a relationship constraint. As the first empirical test of TRC, this study uses scenario analysis to show that, as these attributes change, so do the constraints that are perceived as effective. No single constraint, as predicted, is perceived to be universally effective. Under certain conditions, social versus legal constraints have greater perceived efficacy, but this varies with the three attributes. This research provides support for TRC and suggests insights for future research and current practice.",
keywords = "Agency theory, Empirical research, IS consulting, Legal constraints, Scenario research, Social constraints, Theory of relationship constraints, Theory testing",
author = "Dawson, {Gregory S.} and Watson, {Richard T.} and Boudreau, {Marie Claude}",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781618394729",
volume = "3",
pages = "2364--2379",
booktitle = "International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - An empirical test of the theory of relationship constraints

AU - Dawson, Gregory S.

AU - Watson, Richard T.

AU - Boudreau, Marie Claude

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Agency theory has long been a stalwart of IS research and is one of the most commonly used lenses to study the relationship between a principal and an agent. The Theory of Relationship Constraints (TRC) has recently been recommended as an information-oriented alternative to agency theory. TRC suggests that three attributes (i.e., the level of information asymmetry, levels of tacit and explicit knowledge) affect the perceived efficacy of a relationship constraint. As the first empirical test of TRC, this study uses scenario analysis to show that, as these attributes change, so do the constraints that are perceived as effective. No single constraint, as predicted, is perceived to be universally effective. Under certain conditions, social versus legal constraints have greater perceived efficacy, but this varies with the three attributes. This research provides support for TRC and suggests insights for future research and current practice.

AB - Agency theory has long been a stalwart of IS research and is one of the most commonly used lenses to study the relationship between a principal and an agent. The Theory of Relationship Constraints (TRC) has recently been recommended as an information-oriented alternative to agency theory. TRC suggests that three attributes (i.e., the level of information asymmetry, levels of tacit and explicit knowledge) affect the perceived efficacy of a relationship constraint. As the first empirical test of TRC, this study uses scenario analysis to show that, as these attributes change, so do the constraints that are perceived as effective. No single constraint, as predicted, is perceived to be universally effective. Under certain conditions, social versus legal constraints have greater perceived efficacy, but this varies with the three attributes. This research provides support for TRC and suggests insights for future research and current practice.

KW - Agency theory

KW - Empirical research

KW - IS consulting

KW - Legal constraints

KW - Scenario research

KW - Social constraints

KW - Theory of relationship constraints

KW - Theory testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884633804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884633804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84884633804

SN - 9781618394729

VL - 3

SP - 2364

EP - 2379

BT - International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011

ER -