An Empirical Examination of Validity in Evaluation

Laura R. Peck, Yushim Kim, Joanna Lucio

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    This study addresses validity issues in evaluation that stem from Ernest R. House's book, Evaluating With Validity. The authors examine American Journal of Evaluation articles from 1980 to 2010 that report the results of policy and program evaluations. The authors classify these evaluations according to House's "major approaches" typology (Systems Analysis, Behavioral Objectives, Decision making, Goal-free, Professional Review, Art Criticism, Quasi-legal, and Case Study) and the types of validity (measurement, design, interpretation, use) the evaluations consider. Analyzing the intersection of evaluation type and validity type, the authors explore the status of House's standards of Truth, Beauty, and Justice in evaluation practice.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)350-365
    Number of pages16
    JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
    Volume33
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

    Keywords

    • House
    • beauty
    • evaluation
    • justice
    • truth
    • validity

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Business and International Management
    • Social Psychology
    • Health(social science)
    • Education
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Strategy and Management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An Empirical Examination of Validity in Evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this