An analysis of work release

The Institutionalization of Unsubstantiated Reforms

Jonathan F. Katz, Scott Decker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Work release programs have been praised as a valuable correctional innovation. Four specific benefits—economic advantages, recidivism, job and family considerations, and personality and social benefits—have been cited in the literature. Like many social reforms, work release has received enthusiastic support despite the absence of methodologically sound evaluations. This article examines over forty evaluations of work release. It generally observes that there is an inverse relationship between the methodological quality of the study and the effect of work release. Those few studies with an adequate design have found that work release did not deliver the results it was designed to. In spite of this, such programs have proliferated. The authors explain this phenomena by noting that the existence of such programs satisfies often competing correctional ideologies and allows an expansion of state control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-250
Number of pages22
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Institutionalization
institutionalization
reform
social reform
government supervision
evaluation
Ideologies
Personality
personality
innovation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

An analysis of work release : The Institutionalization of Unsubstantiated Reforms. / Katz, Jonathan F.; Decker, Scott.

In: Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1982, p. 229-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b54e29fa484249a6a9f6a038aa9bfb5f,
title = "An analysis of work release: The Institutionalization of Unsubstantiated Reforms",
abstract = "Work release programs have been praised as a valuable correctional innovation. Four specific benefits—economic advantages, recidivism, job and family considerations, and personality and social benefits—have been cited in the literature. Like many social reforms, work release has received enthusiastic support despite the absence of methodologically sound evaluations. This article examines over forty evaluations of work release. It generally observes that there is an inverse relationship between the methodological quality of the study and the effect of work release. Those few studies with an adequate design have found that work release did not deliver the results it was designed to. In spite of this, such programs have proliferated. The authors explain this phenomena by noting that the existence of such programs satisfies often competing correctional ideologies and allows an expansion of state control.",
author = "Katz, {Jonathan F.} and Scott Decker",
year = "1982",
doi = "10.1177/0093854882009002009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "229--250",
journal = "Criminal Justice and Behavior",
issn = "0093-8548",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An analysis of work release

T2 - The Institutionalization of Unsubstantiated Reforms

AU - Katz, Jonathan F.

AU - Decker, Scott

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - Work release programs have been praised as a valuable correctional innovation. Four specific benefits—economic advantages, recidivism, job and family considerations, and personality and social benefits—have been cited in the literature. Like many social reforms, work release has received enthusiastic support despite the absence of methodologically sound evaluations. This article examines over forty evaluations of work release. It generally observes that there is an inverse relationship between the methodological quality of the study and the effect of work release. Those few studies with an adequate design have found that work release did not deliver the results it was designed to. In spite of this, such programs have proliferated. The authors explain this phenomena by noting that the existence of such programs satisfies often competing correctional ideologies and allows an expansion of state control.

AB - Work release programs have been praised as a valuable correctional innovation. Four specific benefits—economic advantages, recidivism, job and family considerations, and personality and social benefits—have been cited in the literature. Like many social reforms, work release has received enthusiastic support despite the absence of methodologically sound evaluations. This article examines over forty evaluations of work release. It generally observes that there is an inverse relationship between the methodological quality of the study and the effect of work release. Those few studies with an adequate design have found that work release did not deliver the results it was designed to. In spite of this, such programs have proliferated. The authors explain this phenomena by noting that the existence of such programs satisfies often competing correctional ideologies and allows an expansion of state control.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970122004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970122004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093854882009002009

DO - 10.1177/0093854882009002009

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 229

EP - 250

JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior

JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior

SN - 0093-8548

IS - 2

ER -