Amelioration of axis-aligned motion bias for active versus stationary judgments of bilaterally symmetric moving shapes' final destinations

Igor Dolgov., David A. Birchfield, Michael McBeath, Harvey Thornburg, Christopher G. Todd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent research confirms that observers' judgments of projected final destinations of axis-trajectory misaligned moving figures are biased in the direction of primary axis deviation from trajectory, a phenomenon we named the axis-aligned motion (AAM) bias. The present study tests whether this bias occurs in a large, immersive mixed-reality environment that enables active (mobile) responses in making judgments of shapes' destinations. Like Morikawa (1999), we found that accuracy depended on axis-trajectory alignment and that there was a correspondence between final destination judgment error and the direction of axial deviation from the trajectory. Extending prior work, we found that comobile judgments were significantly more accurate than stationary ones for symmetric moving shapes, regardless of axial deviation, but only marginally so for asymmetric shapes. We conclude that our findings are ecologically consistent and that AAM is a natural regularity for which people have acquired a complementary perceptual-cognitive attunement: the AAM bias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-529
Number of pages7
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

trend
regularity
Research
Trajectory
Direction compound
Deviation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sensory Systems
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Amelioration of axis-aligned motion bias for active versus stationary judgments of bilaterally symmetric moving shapes' final destinations. / Dolgov., Igor; Birchfield, David A.; McBeath, Michael; Thornburg, Harvey; Todd, Christopher G.

In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 71, No. 3, 04.2009, p. 523-529.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{38283f5c901d4e3d969176cae364a631,
title = "Amelioration of axis-aligned motion bias for active versus stationary judgments of bilaterally symmetric moving shapes' final destinations",
abstract = "Recent research confirms that observers' judgments of projected final destinations of axis-trajectory misaligned moving figures are biased in the direction of primary axis deviation from trajectory, a phenomenon we named the axis-aligned motion (AAM) bias. The present study tests whether this bias occurs in a large, immersive mixed-reality environment that enables active (mobile) responses in making judgments of shapes' destinations. Like Morikawa (1999), we found that accuracy depended on axis-trajectory alignment and that there was a correspondence between final destination judgment error and the direction of axial deviation from the trajectory. Extending prior work, we found that comobile judgments were significantly more accurate than stationary ones for symmetric moving shapes, regardless of axial deviation, but only marginally so for asymmetric shapes. We conclude that our findings are ecologically consistent and that AAM is a natural regularity for which people have acquired a complementary perceptual-cognitive attunement: the AAM bias.",
author = "Igor Dolgov. and Birchfield, {David A.} and Michael McBeath and Harvey Thornburg and Todd, {Christopher G.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.3758/APP.71.3.523",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "523--529",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Amelioration of axis-aligned motion bias for active versus stationary judgments of bilaterally symmetric moving shapes' final destinations

AU - Dolgov., Igor

AU - Birchfield, David A.

AU - McBeath, Michael

AU - Thornburg, Harvey

AU - Todd, Christopher G.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Recent research confirms that observers' judgments of projected final destinations of axis-trajectory misaligned moving figures are biased in the direction of primary axis deviation from trajectory, a phenomenon we named the axis-aligned motion (AAM) bias. The present study tests whether this bias occurs in a large, immersive mixed-reality environment that enables active (mobile) responses in making judgments of shapes' destinations. Like Morikawa (1999), we found that accuracy depended on axis-trajectory alignment and that there was a correspondence between final destination judgment error and the direction of axial deviation from the trajectory. Extending prior work, we found that comobile judgments were significantly more accurate than stationary ones for symmetric moving shapes, regardless of axial deviation, but only marginally so for asymmetric shapes. We conclude that our findings are ecologically consistent and that AAM is a natural regularity for which people have acquired a complementary perceptual-cognitive attunement: the AAM bias.

AB - Recent research confirms that observers' judgments of projected final destinations of axis-trajectory misaligned moving figures are biased in the direction of primary axis deviation from trajectory, a phenomenon we named the axis-aligned motion (AAM) bias. The present study tests whether this bias occurs in a large, immersive mixed-reality environment that enables active (mobile) responses in making judgments of shapes' destinations. Like Morikawa (1999), we found that accuracy depended on axis-trajectory alignment and that there was a correspondence between final destination judgment error and the direction of axial deviation from the trajectory. Extending prior work, we found that comobile judgments were significantly more accurate than stationary ones for symmetric moving shapes, regardless of axial deviation, but only marginally so for asymmetric shapes. We conclude that our findings are ecologically consistent and that AAM is a natural regularity for which people have acquired a complementary perceptual-cognitive attunement: the AAM bias.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65549091538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65549091538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/APP.71.3.523

DO - 10.3758/APP.71.3.523

M3 - Article

C2 - 19304643

AN - SCOPUS:65549091538

VL - 71

SP - 523

EP - 529

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 3

ER -