Amazonian landscapes and the bias in field studies of forest structure and biomass

David C. Marvin, Gregory P. Asner, David E. Knapp, Christopher B. Anderson, Roberta E. Martin, Felipe Sinca, Raul Tupayachi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tropical forests convert more atmospheric carbon into biomass each year than any terrestrial ecosystem on Earth, underscoring the importance of accurate tropical forest structure and biomass maps for the understanding and management of the global carbon cycle. Ecologists have long used field inventory plots as the main tool for understanding forest structure and biomass at landscape-to-regional scales, under the implicit assumption that these plots accurately represent their surrounding landscape. However, no study has used continuous, high-spatial-resolution data to test whether field plots meet this assumption in tropical forests. Using airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) acquired over three regions in Peru, we assessed how representative a typical set of field plots are relative to their surrounding host landscapes. We uncovered substantial mean biases (9-98%) in forest canopy structure (height, gaps, and layers) and aboveground biomass in both lowland Amazonian and montane Andean landscapes. Moreover, simulations reveal that an impractical number of 1-ha field plots (from 10 to more than 100 per landscape) are needed to develop accurate estimates of aboveground biomass at landscape scales. These biases should temper the use of plots for extrapolations of forest dynamics to larger scales, and they demonstrate the need for a fundamental shift to high-resolution active remote sensing techniques as a primary sampling tool in tropical forest biomass studies. The potential decrease in the bias and uncertainty of remotely sensed estimates of forest structure and biomass is a vital step toward successful tropical forest conservation and climate-change mitigation policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E5224-E5232
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume111
Issue number48
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 24 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biomass
Carbon Cycle
Peru
Climate Change
Uncertainty
Ecosystem
Forests
Carbon
Light
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Canopy structure
  • Field inventory plots
  • Forest carbon
  • LiDAR
  • Peru tropical forest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Amazonian landscapes and the bias in field studies of forest structure and biomass. / Marvin, David C.; Asner, Gregory P.; Knapp, David E.; Anderson, Christopher B.; Martin, Roberta E.; Sinca, Felipe; Tupayachi, Raul.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 111, No. 48, 24.11.2014, p. E5224-E5232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marvin, David C. ; Asner, Gregory P. ; Knapp, David E. ; Anderson, Christopher B. ; Martin, Roberta E. ; Sinca, Felipe ; Tupayachi, Raul. / Amazonian landscapes and the bias in field studies of forest structure and biomass. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014 ; Vol. 111, No. 48. pp. E5224-E5232.
@article{4ddab892b8a44ba18e639208e1621712,
title = "Amazonian landscapes and the bias in field studies of forest structure and biomass",
abstract = "Tropical forests convert more atmospheric carbon into biomass each year than any terrestrial ecosystem on Earth, underscoring the importance of accurate tropical forest structure and biomass maps for the understanding and management of the global carbon cycle. Ecologists have long used field inventory plots as the main tool for understanding forest structure and biomass at landscape-to-regional scales, under the implicit assumption that these plots accurately represent their surrounding landscape. However, no study has used continuous, high-spatial-resolution data to test whether field plots meet this assumption in tropical forests. Using airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) acquired over three regions in Peru, we assessed how representative a typical set of field plots are relative to their surrounding host landscapes. We uncovered substantial mean biases (9-98{\%}) in forest canopy structure (height, gaps, and layers) and aboveground biomass in both lowland Amazonian and montane Andean landscapes. Moreover, simulations reveal that an impractical number of 1-ha field plots (from 10 to more than 100 per landscape) are needed to develop accurate estimates of aboveground biomass at landscape scales. These biases should temper the use of plots for extrapolations of forest dynamics to larger scales, and they demonstrate the need for a fundamental shift to high-resolution active remote sensing techniques as a primary sampling tool in tropical forest biomass studies. The potential decrease in the bias and uncertainty of remotely sensed estimates of forest structure and biomass is a vital step toward successful tropical forest conservation and climate-change mitigation policy.",
keywords = "Canopy structure, Field inventory plots, Forest carbon, LiDAR, Peru tropical forest",
author = "Marvin, {David C.} and Asner, {Gregory P.} and Knapp, {David E.} and Anderson, {Christopher B.} and Martin, {Roberta E.} and Felipe Sinca and Raul Tupayachi",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1412999111",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "111",
pages = "E5224--E5232",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "48",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Amazonian landscapes and the bias in field studies of forest structure and biomass

AU - Marvin, David C.

AU - Asner, Gregory P.

AU - Knapp, David E.

AU - Anderson, Christopher B.

AU - Martin, Roberta E.

AU - Sinca, Felipe

AU - Tupayachi, Raul

PY - 2014/11/24

Y1 - 2014/11/24

N2 - Tropical forests convert more atmospheric carbon into biomass each year than any terrestrial ecosystem on Earth, underscoring the importance of accurate tropical forest structure and biomass maps for the understanding and management of the global carbon cycle. Ecologists have long used field inventory plots as the main tool for understanding forest structure and biomass at landscape-to-regional scales, under the implicit assumption that these plots accurately represent their surrounding landscape. However, no study has used continuous, high-spatial-resolution data to test whether field plots meet this assumption in tropical forests. Using airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) acquired over three regions in Peru, we assessed how representative a typical set of field plots are relative to their surrounding host landscapes. We uncovered substantial mean biases (9-98%) in forest canopy structure (height, gaps, and layers) and aboveground biomass in both lowland Amazonian and montane Andean landscapes. Moreover, simulations reveal that an impractical number of 1-ha field plots (from 10 to more than 100 per landscape) are needed to develop accurate estimates of aboveground biomass at landscape scales. These biases should temper the use of plots for extrapolations of forest dynamics to larger scales, and they demonstrate the need for a fundamental shift to high-resolution active remote sensing techniques as a primary sampling tool in tropical forest biomass studies. The potential decrease in the bias and uncertainty of remotely sensed estimates of forest structure and biomass is a vital step toward successful tropical forest conservation and climate-change mitigation policy.

AB - Tropical forests convert more atmospheric carbon into biomass each year than any terrestrial ecosystem on Earth, underscoring the importance of accurate tropical forest structure and biomass maps for the understanding and management of the global carbon cycle. Ecologists have long used field inventory plots as the main tool for understanding forest structure and biomass at landscape-to-regional scales, under the implicit assumption that these plots accurately represent their surrounding landscape. However, no study has used continuous, high-spatial-resolution data to test whether field plots meet this assumption in tropical forests. Using airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) acquired over three regions in Peru, we assessed how representative a typical set of field plots are relative to their surrounding host landscapes. We uncovered substantial mean biases (9-98%) in forest canopy structure (height, gaps, and layers) and aboveground biomass in both lowland Amazonian and montane Andean landscapes. Moreover, simulations reveal that an impractical number of 1-ha field plots (from 10 to more than 100 per landscape) are needed to develop accurate estimates of aboveground biomass at landscape scales. These biases should temper the use of plots for extrapolations of forest dynamics to larger scales, and they demonstrate the need for a fundamental shift to high-resolution active remote sensing techniques as a primary sampling tool in tropical forest biomass studies. The potential decrease in the bias and uncertainty of remotely sensed estimates of forest structure and biomass is a vital step toward successful tropical forest conservation and climate-change mitigation policy.

KW - Canopy structure

KW - Field inventory plots

KW - Forest carbon

KW - LiDAR

KW - Peru tropical forest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914169018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84914169018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1412999111

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1412999111

M3 - Article

C2 - 25422434

AN - SCOPUS:84914169018

VL - 111

SP - E5224-E5232

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 48

ER -