Alternative Delivery Methods in the Water and Wastewater Industry

Challenges and Opportunities

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Today, there is an urgent need to upgrade existing drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities and build new ones. Aging infrastructure, population growth, and more stringent environmental regulations have been some of the main drivers. Water industry leaders and decision-makers are looking at innovative technological and project delivery solutions to help ease their financial burden. Water and wastewater treatment plants have traditionally been constructed, retrofitted, and rehabilitated using the design-bid-build (DBB) project delivery. DBB has been used for decades and is adequate for projects where the work is well defined and there is relatively low uncertainty (i.e., projects that are repetitive, with low complexity). However, DBB might not be the best method to use for more complex facilities where integration between the different stakeholders can result in more innovation and improve efficiencies. Several organizations have promoted the use of non-traditional, alternative project delivery methods (APDM) such as design-build (DB) and construction manager at risk (CMAR) touting benefits including lower cost, faster schedules, and higher quality. These alternative methods have been used in the transportation and building sectors, and are starting to be adopted in the water utility sector. This paper overviews published sources that have quantified the impact of delivery systems on project performance in several industries. This overview will be the foundation for a discussion of challenges and opportunities of adopting alternative delivery methods in the water and wastewater industry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPipelines 2017
Subtitle of host publicationConstruction and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2017 Conference
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Pages297-307
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9780784480892
StatePublished - 2017
EventPipelines 2017 Conference: Construction and Rehabilitation - Phoenix, United States
Duration: Aug 6 2017Aug 9 2017

Other

OtherPipelines 2017 Conference: Construction and Rehabilitation
CountryUnited States
CityPhoenix
Period8/6/178/9/17

Fingerprint

Wastewater
wastewater
industry
Water treatment
Wastewater treatment
Water
Industry
water
Environmental regulations
utility sector
Potable water
Managers
water industry
Innovation
Aging of materials
method
project
population growth
stakeholder
innovation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

El Asmar, M., & Ariaratnam, S. (2017). Alternative Delivery Methods in the Water and Wastewater Industry: Challenges and Opportunities. In Pipelines 2017: Construction and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2017 Conference (pp. 297-307). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).

Alternative Delivery Methods in the Water and Wastewater Industry : Challenges and Opportunities. / El Asmar, Mounir; Ariaratnam, Samuel.

Pipelines 2017: Construction and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2017 Conference. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2017. p. 297-307.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

El Asmar, M & Ariaratnam, S 2017, Alternative Delivery Methods in the Water and Wastewater Industry: Challenges and Opportunities. in Pipelines 2017: Construction and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2017 Conference. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), pp. 297-307, Pipelines 2017 Conference: Construction and Rehabilitation, Phoenix, United States, 8/6/17.
El Asmar M, Ariaratnam S. Alternative Delivery Methods in the Water and Wastewater Industry: Challenges and Opportunities. In Pipelines 2017: Construction and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2017 Conference. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2017. p. 297-307
El Asmar, Mounir ; Ariaratnam, Samuel. / Alternative Delivery Methods in the Water and Wastewater Industry : Challenges and Opportunities. Pipelines 2017: Construction and Rehabilitation - Proceedings of Sessions of the Pipelines 2017 Conference. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2017. pp. 297-307
@inproceedings{6c4e91503a0e4c058d91595bb063ba84,
title = "Alternative Delivery Methods in the Water and Wastewater Industry: Challenges and Opportunities",
abstract = "Today, there is an urgent need to upgrade existing drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities and build new ones. Aging infrastructure, population growth, and more stringent environmental regulations have been some of the main drivers. Water industry leaders and decision-makers are looking at innovative technological and project delivery solutions to help ease their financial burden. Water and wastewater treatment plants have traditionally been constructed, retrofitted, and rehabilitated using the design-bid-build (DBB) project delivery. DBB has been used for decades and is adequate for projects where the work is well defined and there is relatively low uncertainty (i.e., projects that are repetitive, with low complexity). However, DBB might not be the best method to use for more complex facilities where integration between the different stakeholders can result in more innovation and improve efficiencies. Several organizations have promoted the use of non-traditional, alternative project delivery methods (APDM) such as design-build (DB) and construction manager at risk (CMAR) touting benefits including lower cost, faster schedules, and higher quality. These alternative methods have been used in the transportation and building sectors, and are starting to be adopted in the water utility sector. This paper overviews published sources that have quantified the impact of delivery systems on project performance in several industries. This overview will be the foundation for a discussion of challenges and opportunities of adopting alternative delivery methods in the water and wastewater industry.",
author = "{El Asmar}, Mounir and Samuel Ariaratnam",
year = "2017",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "297--307",
booktitle = "Pipelines 2017",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Alternative Delivery Methods in the Water and Wastewater Industry

T2 - Challenges and Opportunities

AU - El Asmar, Mounir

AU - Ariaratnam, Samuel

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Today, there is an urgent need to upgrade existing drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities and build new ones. Aging infrastructure, population growth, and more stringent environmental regulations have been some of the main drivers. Water industry leaders and decision-makers are looking at innovative technological and project delivery solutions to help ease their financial burden. Water and wastewater treatment plants have traditionally been constructed, retrofitted, and rehabilitated using the design-bid-build (DBB) project delivery. DBB has been used for decades and is adequate for projects where the work is well defined and there is relatively low uncertainty (i.e., projects that are repetitive, with low complexity). However, DBB might not be the best method to use for more complex facilities where integration between the different stakeholders can result in more innovation and improve efficiencies. Several organizations have promoted the use of non-traditional, alternative project delivery methods (APDM) such as design-build (DB) and construction manager at risk (CMAR) touting benefits including lower cost, faster schedules, and higher quality. These alternative methods have been used in the transportation and building sectors, and are starting to be adopted in the water utility sector. This paper overviews published sources that have quantified the impact of delivery systems on project performance in several industries. This overview will be the foundation for a discussion of challenges and opportunities of adopting alternative delivery methods in the water and wastewater industry.

AB - Today, there is an urgent need to upgrade existing drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities and build new ones. Aging infrastructure, population growth, and more stringent environmental regulations have been some of the main drivers. Water industry leaders and decision-makers are looking at innovative technological and project delivery solutions to help ease their financial burden. Water and wastewater treatment plants have traditionally been constructed, retrofitted, and rehabilitated using the design-bid-build (DBB) project delivery. DBB has been used for decades and is adequate for projects where the work is well defined and there is relatively low uncertainty (i.e., projects that are repetitive, with low complexity). However, DBB might not be the best method to use for more complex facilities where integration between the different stakeholders can result in more innovation and improve efficiencies. Several organizations have promoted the use of non-traditional, alternative project delivery methods (APDM) such as design-build (DB) and construction manager at risk (CMAR) touting benefits including lower cost, faster schedules, and higher quality. These alternative methods have been used in the transportation and building sectors, and are starting to be adopted in the water utility sector. This paper overviews published sources that have quantified the impact of delivery systems on project performance in several industries. This overview will be the foundation for a discussion of challenges and opportunities of adopting alternative delivery methods in the water and wastewater industry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030115250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030115250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 297

EP - 307

BT - Pipelines 2017

PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

ER -