Alternative Approaches to Compensation and Producer Rights

Andrew Schmitz, Dwayne J. Haynes, Troy Schmitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When policies are changed, it is not uncommon for losers to be compensated. Economic theory and quantitative analysis are useful in determining the efficiency gains/losses associated with a policy change, but are little help in deciding what the approach to compensation should be. The amount of compensation varies, depending on, in part, the political clout of the parties being negatively affected by a policy change-compensation is what politicians and the sector demanding compensation can agree on. We formulate four approaches to producer compensation within the context of the Ontario Tobacco Transition Program, where producers would have suffered losses in the absence of compensation. The approaches range from providing zero compensation to providing compensation based on the entire value of the tobacco quota. The Canadian government chose the latter and compensated producers for the termination of the tobacco quota program based on an approach that far exceeded other possible compensation approaches.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2015

Fingerprint

tobacco
economic theory
Ontario
quantitative analysis
rights
policy
Tobacco

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change

Cite this

Alternative Approaches to Compensation and Producer Rights. / Schmitz, Andrew; Haynes, Dwayne J.; Schmitz, Troy.

In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ad0b355db30421bab4642e0e947725a,
title = "Alternative Approaches to Compensation and Producer Rights",
abstract = "When policies are changed, it is not uncommon for losers to be compensated. Economic theory and quantitative analysis are useful in determining the efficiency gains/losses associated with a policy change, but are little help in deciding what the approach to compensation should be. The amount of compensation varies, depending on, in part, the political clout of the parties being negatively affected by a policy change-compensation is what politicians and the sector demanding compensation can agree on. We formulate four approaches to producer compensation within the context of the Ontario Tobacco Transition Program, where producers would have suffered losses in the absence of compensation. The approaches range from providing zero compensation to providing compensation based on the entire value of the tobacco quota. The Canadian government chose the latter and compensated producers for the termination of the tobacco quota program based on an approach that far exceeded other possible compensation approaches.",
author = "Andrew Schmitz and Haynes, {Dwayne J.} and Troy Schmitz",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/cjag.12085",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0008-3976",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternative Approaches to Compensation and Producer Rights

AU - Schmitz, Andrew

AU - Haynes, Dwayne J.

AU - Schmitz, Troy

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - When policies are changed, it is not uncommon for losers to be compensated. Economic theory and quantitative analysis are useful in determining the efficiency gains/losses associated with a policy change, but are little help in deciding what the approach to compensation should be. The amount of compensation varies, depending on, in part, the political clout of the parties being negatively affected by a policy change-compensation is what politicians and the sector demanding compensation can agree on. We formulate four approaches to producer compensation within the context of the Ontario Tobacco Transition Program, where producers would have suffered losses in the absence of compensation. The approaches range from providing zero compensation to providing compensation based on the entire value of the tobacco quota. The Canadian government chose the latter and compensated producers for the termination of the tobacco quota program based on an approach that far exceeded other possible compensation approaches.

AB - When policies are changed, it is not uncommon for losers to be compensated. Economic theory and quantitative analysis are useful in determining the efficiency gains/losses associated with a policy change, but are little help in deciding what the approach to compensation should be. The amount of compensation varies, depending on, in part, the political clout of the parties being negatively affected by a policy change-compensation is what politicians and the sector demanding compensation can agree on. We formulate four approaches to producer compensation within the context of the Ontario Tobacco Transition Program, where producers would have suffered losses in the absence of compensation. The approaches range from providing zero compensation to providing compensation based on the entire value of the tobacco quota. The Canadian government chose the latter and compensated producers for the termination of the tobacco quota program based on an approach that far exceeded other possible compensation approaches.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945249019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945249019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cjag.12085

DO - 10.1111/cjag.12085

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84945249019

JO - Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

JF - Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

SN - 0008-3976

ER -