Alternate assessments of students with significant disabilities: Alternative approaches, common technical challenges

Stephen Elliott, Andrew T. Roach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines three typical approaches to alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities-portfolios, performance assessments, and rating scales. A detailed analysis of common and unique design features of these approaches is provided, including features of each approach that influence the psychometric quality of their results. Validity imperatives for alternate assessments are reviewed, and approaches for addressing the need for validity evidence are outlined. The article concludes with an examination of three technical challenges-alignment, scores and scoring, and standard setting-common to all alternate assessments. In light of these challenges, existing methods and professional testing standards are endorsed as necessary guidance for understanding and advancing alternate assessment practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-333
Number of pages33
JournalApplied Measurement in Education
Volume20
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

disability
Students
Psychometrics
student
performance assessment
rating scale
psychometrics
examination
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Alternate assessments of students with significant disabilities : Alternative approaches, common technical challenges. / Elliott, Stephen; Roach, Andrew T.

In: Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2007, p. 301-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fc99823ec1144ccfba8b20113e83cfd3,
title = "Alternate assessments of students with significant disabilities: Alternative approaches, common technical challenges",
abstract = "This article examines three typical approaches to alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities-portfolios, performance assessments, and rating scales. A detailed analysis of common and unique design features of these approaches is provided, including features of each approach that influence the psychometric quality of their results. Validity imperatives for alternate assessments are reviewed, and approaches for addressing the need for validity evidence are outlined. The article concludes with an examination of three technical challenges-alignment, scores and scoring, and standard setting-common to all alternate assessments. In light of these challenges, existing methods and professional testing standards are endorsed as necessary guidance for understanding and advancing alternate assessment practices.",
author = "Stephen Elliott and Roach, {Andrew T.}",
year = "2007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "301--333",
journal = "Applied Measurement in Education",
issn = "0895-7347",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternate assessments of students with significant disabilities

T2 - Alternative approaches, common technical challenges

AU - Elliott, Stephen

AU - Roach, Andrew T.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This article examines three typical approaches to alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities-portfolios, performance assessments, and rating scales. A detailed analysis of common and unique design features of these approaches is provided, including features of each approach that influence the psychometric quality of their results. Validity imperatives for alternate assessments are reviewed, and approaches for addressing the need for validity evidence are outlined. The article concludes with an examination of three technical challenges-alignment, scores and scoring, and standard setting-common to all alternate assessments. In light of these challenges, existing methods and professional testing standards are endorsed as necessary guidance for understanding and advancing alternate assessment practices.

AB - This article examines three typical approaches to alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities-portfolios, performance assessments, and rating scales. A detailed analysis of common and unique design features of these approaches is provided, including features of each approach that influence the psychometric quality of their results. Validity imperatives for alternate assessments are reviewed, and approaches for addressing the need for validity evidence are outlined. The article concludes with an examination of three technical challenges-alignment, scores and scoring, and standard setting-common to all alternate assessments. In light of these challenges, existing methods and professional testing standards are endorsed as necessary guidance for understanding and advancing alternate assessment practices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547759214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547759214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34547759214

VL - 20

SP - 301

EP - 333

JO - Applied Measurement in Education

JF - Applied Measurement in Education

SN - 0895-7347

IS - 3

ER -