Alliance experience and governance flexibility

Jongkuk Lee, Glenn Hoetker, William Qualls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior work has mapped the transaction at the heart of an alliance to the risks of opportunism inherent in that alliance and, ultimately, to how the alliance is structured and governed. We extend this approach by noting that the parties in an alliance do not necessarily perceive the same hazards as predominant and thus may have different preferences for how the alliance is structured. Nevertheless, it is in each party's best interest to find a structure that protects its interests, while also allowing its partner to protect its interests sufficiently. Drawing from the alliance management capabilities literature, we argue that firms with more alliance experience are better able to protect their interests under any given alliance structure, making the choice of structure less consequential to them. The resulting governance versatility provides a competitive advantage by enabling firms to form advantageous alliances that are less available to inexperienced competitors. Our study of innovative alliances in biopharmaceutical industry lends support to the hypotheses, allowing us to advance the literature on governance choice in alliances, the literature on alliance management, and their intersection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1536-1551
Number of pages16
JournalOrganization Science
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Hazards
Industry
Alliances
Governance
Alliance management

Keywords

  • Alliance capabilities
  • Alliance experience
  • Governance flexibility
  • Innovation
  • Pharmaceutical industry
  • Strategic alliances

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Alliance experience and governance flexibility. / Lee, Jongkuk; Hoetker, Glenn; Qualls, William.

In: Organization Science, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2015, p. 1536-1551.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, J, Hoetker, G & Qualls, W 2015, 'Alliance experience and governance flexibility', Organization Science, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1536-1551. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0989
Lee, Jongkuk ; Hoetker, Glenn ; Qualls, William. / Alliance experience and governance flexibility. In: Organization Science. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 1536-1551.
@article{f46945e74ca74ad2a986fa6d10214c00,
title = "Alliance experience and governance flexibility",
abstract = "Prior work has mapped the transaction at the heart of an alliance to the risks of opportunism inherent in that alliance and, ultimately, to how the alliance is structured and governed. We extend this approach by noting that the parties in an alliance do not necessarily perceive the same hazards as predominant and thus may have different preferences for how the alliance is structured. Nevertheless, it is in each party's best interest to find a structure that protects its interests, while also allowing its partner to protect its interests sufficiently. Drawing from the alliance management capabilities literature, we argue that firms with more alliance experience are better able to protect their interests under any given alliance structure, making the choice of structure less consequential to them. The resulting governance versatility provides a competitive advantage by enabling firms to form advantageous alliances that are less available to inexperienced competitors. Our study of innovative alliances in biopharmaceutical industry lends support to the hypotheses, allowing us to advance the literature on governance choice in alliances, the literature on alliance management, and their intersection.",
keywords = "Alliance capabilities, Alliance experience, Governance flexibility, Innovation, Pharmaceutical industry, Strategic alliances",
author = "Jongkuk Lee and Glenn Hoetker and William Qualls",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1287/orsc.2015.0989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1536--1551",
journal = "Organization Science",
issn = "1047-7039",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alliance experience and governance flexibility

AU - Lee, Jongkuk

AU - Hoetker, Glenn

AU - Qualls, William

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Prior work has mapped the transaction at the heart of an alliance to the risks of opportunism inherent in that alliance and, ultimately, to how the alliance is structured and governed. We extend this approach by noting that the parties in an alliance do not necessarily perceive the same hazards as predominant and thus may have different preferences for how the alliance is structured. Nevertheless, it is in each party's best interest to find a structure that protects its interests, while also allowing its partner to protect its interests sufficiently. Drawing from the alliance management capabilities literature, we argue that firms with more alliance experience are better able to protect their interests under any given alliance structure, making the choice of structure less consequential to them. The resulting governance versatility provides a competitive advantage by enabling firms to form advantageous alliances that are less available to inexperienced competitors. Our study of innovative alliances in biopharmaceutical industry lends support to the hypotheses, allowing us to advance the literature on governance choice in alliances, the literature on alliance management, and their intersection.

AB - Prior work has mapped the transaction at the heart of an alliance to the risks of opportunism inherent in that alliance and, ultimately, to how the alliance is structured and governed. We extend this approach by noting that the parties in an alliance do not necessarily perceive the same hazards as predominant and thus may have different preferences for how the alliance is structured. Nevertheless, it is in each party's best interest to find a structure that protects its interests, while also allowing its partner to protect its interests sufficiently. Drawing from the alliance management capabilities literature, we argue that firms with more alliance experience are better able to protect their interests under any given alliance structure, making the choice of structure less consequential to them. The resulting governance versatility provides a competitive advantage by enabling firms to form advantageous alliances that are less available to inexperienced competitors. Our study of innovative alliances in biopharmaceutical industry lends support to the hypotheses, allowing us to advance the literature on governance choice in alliances, the literature on alliance management, and their intersection.

KW - Alliance capabilities

KW - Alliance experience

KW - Governance flexibility

KW - Innovation

KW - Pharmaceutical industry

KW - Strategic alliances

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997840865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84997840865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/orsc.2015.0989

DO - 10.1287/orsc.2015.0989

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1536

EP - 1551

JO - Organization Science

JF - Organization Science

SN - 1047-7039

IS - 5

ER -