Alignment of the intended, planned, and enacted curriculum in general and special education and its relation to student achievement

Alexander Kurz, Stephen Elliott, Joseph H. Wehby, John L. Smithson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this initial study, the authors examined the content of the planned and enacted eighth-grade mathematics curriculum for 18 general and special education teachers and the curriculaa's alignment to state standards via the Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum. The relation between alignment and student achievement was analyzed for three formative assessments and the corresponding state test within a school year. Results indicated that alignment for the planned and enacted curriculum to state standards was low with no significant differences between general and special education teachers. Significant correlations between student achievement averages for 238 students and teacher alignment indices were equal to or greater than .48. When teacher groups were examined separately, the relation between alignment and achievement remained significant only for special education, with correlations equal to or greater than .75. The studya's conceptual and methodological framework provides a model for subsequent research on alignment and opportunity to learn in general and special education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-145
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Special Education
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Special Education
general education
special education
Curriculum
Students
curriculum
teacher
student
Mathematics
mathematics
Research
school
Group

Keywords

  • access to the general education curriculum
  • alignment
  • opportunity-to-learn
  • standards-based instruction
  • validity of test score interpretations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Alignment of the intended, planned, and enacted curriculum in general and special education and its relation to student achievement. / Kurz, Alexander; Elliott, Stephen; Wehby, Joseph H.; Smithson, John L.

In: Journal of Special Education, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2010, p. 131-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3bbfc785213e4fee91db9e4fd83415ac,
title = "Alignment of the intended, planned, and enacted curriculum in general and special education and its relation to student achievement",
abstract = "In this initial study, the authors examined the content of the planned and enacted eighth-grade mathematics curriculum for 18 general and special education teachers and the curriculaa's alignment to state standards via the Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum. The relation between alignment and student achievement was analyzed for three formative assessments and the corresponding state test within a school year. Results indicated that alignment for the planned and enacted curriculum to state standards was low with no significant differences between general and special education teachers. Significant correlations between student achievement averages for 238 students and teacher alignment indices were equal to or greater than .48. When teacher groups were examined separately, the relation between alignment and achievement remained significant only for special education, with correlations equal to or greater than .75. The studya's conceptual and methodological framework provides a model for subsequent research on alignment and opportunity to learn in general and special education.",
keywords = "access to the general education curriculum, alignment, opportunity-to-learn, standards-based instruction, validity of test score interpretations",
author = "Alexander Kurz and Stephen Elliott and Wehby, {Joseph H.} and Smithson, {John L.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1177/0022466909341196",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "131--145",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alignment of the intended, planned, and enacted curriculum in general and special education and its relation to student achievement

AU - Kurz, Alexander

AU - Elliott, Stephen

AU - Wehby, Joseph H.

AU - Smithson, John L.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - In this initial study, the authors examined the content of the planned and enacted eighth-grade mathematics curriculum for 18 general and special education teachers and the curriculaa's alignment to state standards via the Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum. The relation between alignment and student achievement was analyzed for three formative assessments and the corresponding state test within a school year. Results indicated that alignment for the planned and enacted curriculum to state standards was low with no significant differences between general and special education teachers. Significant correlations between student achievement averages for 238 students and teacher alignment indices were equal to or greater than .48. When teacher groups were examined separately, the relation between alignment and achievement remained significant only for special education, with correlations equal to or greater than .75. The studya's conceptual and methodological framework provides a model for subsequent research on alignment and opportunity to learn in general and special education.

AB - In this initial study, the authors examined the content of the planned and enacted eighth-grade mathematics curriculum for 18 general and special education teachers and the curriculaa's alignment to state standards via the Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum. The relation between alignment and student achievement was analyzed for three formative assessments and the corresponding state test within a school year. Results indicated that alignment for the planned and enacted curriculum to state standards was low with no significant differences between general and special education teachers. Significant correlations between student achievement averages for 238 students and teacher alignment indices were equal to or greater than .48. When teacher groups were examined separately, the relation between alignment and achievement remained significant only for special education, with correlations equal to or greater than .75. The studya's conceptual and methodological framework provides a model for subsequent research on alignment and opportunity to learn in general and special education.

KW - access to the general education curriculum

KW - alignment

KW - opportunity-to-learn

KW - standards-based instruction

KW - validity of test score interpretations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957919618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957919618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022466909341196

DO - 10.1177/0022466909341196

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 131

EP - 145

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 3

ER -