Aggress to Impress

Hostility as an Evolved Context-Dependent Strategy

Vladas Griskevicius, Joshua M. Tybur, Steven W. Gangestad, Elaine F. Perea, Jenessa R. Shapiro, Douglas Kenrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

156 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Given the high costs of aggression, why have people evolved to act aggressively? Comparative biologists have frequently observed links between aggression, status, and mating in nonhuman animals. In this series of experiments, the authors examined the effects of status, competition, and mating motives on men's and women's aggression. For men, status motives increased direct aggression (face-to-face confrontation). Men's aggression was also boosted by mating motives, but only when observers were other men. For women, both status and mating motives increased indirect aggression (e.g., socially excluding the perpetrator). Although neither status nor mating motives increased women's direct aggression, women did become more directly aggressive when motivated to compete for scarce resources. These context- and sex-specific effects on human aggression contribute to a broader understanding of the functional nature of aggressive behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)980-994
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume96
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Hostility
Aggression
aggression
Women's Rights
aggressive behavior
animal
Costs and Cost Analysis
experiment
costs
resources

Keywords

  • aggression
  • mating strategies
  • sex differences
  • sexual selection
  • status competition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Aggress to Impress : Hostility as an Evolved Context-Dependent Strategy. / Griskevicius, Vladas; Tybur, Joshua M.; Gangestad, Steven W.; Perea, Elaine F.; Shapiro, Jenessa R.; Kenrick, Douglas.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 5, 05.2009, p. 980-994.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Griskevicius, V, Tybur, JM, Gangestad, SW, Perea, EF, Shapiro, JR & Kenrick, D 2009, 'Aggress to Impress: Hostility as an Evolved Context-Dependent Strategy', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 980-994. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013907
Griskevicius, Vladas ; Tybur, Joshua M. ; Gangestad, Steven W. ; Perea, Elaine F. ; Shapiro, Jenessa R. ; Kenrick, Douglas. / Aggress to Impress : Hostility as an Evolved Context-Dependent Strategy. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009 ; Vol. 96, No. 5. pp. 980-994.
@article{e55f415f83b8483eb3d5f3ab79031829,
title = "Aggress to Impress: Hostility as an Evolved Context-Dependent Strategy",
abstract = "Given the high costs of aggression, why have people evolved to act aggressively? Comparative biologists have frequently observed links between aggression, status, and mating in nonhuman animals. In this series of experiments, the authors examined the effects of status, competition, and mating motives on men's and women's aggression. For men, status motives increased direct aggression (face-to-face confrontation). Men's aggression was also boosted by mating motives, but only when observers were other men. For women, both status and mating motives increased indirect aggression (e.g., socially excluding the perpetrator). Although neither status nor mating motives increased women's direct aggression, women did become more directly aggressive when motivated to compete for scarce resources. These context- and sex-specific effects on human aggression contribute to a broader understanding of the functional nature of aggressive behavior.",
keywords = "aggression, mating strategies, sex differences, sexual selection, status competition",
author = "Vladas Griskevicius and Tybur, {Joshua M.} and Gangestad, {Steven W.} and Perea, {Elaine F.} and Shapiro, {Jenessa R.} and Douglas Kenrick",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/a0013907",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "980--994",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aggress to Impress

T2 - Hostility as an Evolved Context-Dependent Strategy

AU - Griskevicius, Vladas

AU - Tybur, Joshua M.

AU - Gangestad, Steven W.

AU - Perea, Elaine F.

AU - Shapiro, Jenessa R.

AU - Kenrick, Douglas

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Given the high costs of aggression, why have people evolved to act aggressively? Comparative biologists have frequently observed links between aggression, status, and mating in nonhuman animals. In this series of experiments, the authors examined the effects of status, competition, and mating motives on men's and women's aggression. For men, status motives increased direct aggression (face-to-face confrontation). Men's aggression was also boosted by mating motives, but only when observers were other men. For women, both status and mating motives increased indirect aggression (e.g., socially excluding the perpetrator). Although neither status nor mating motives increased women's direct aggression, women did become more directly aggressive when motivated to compete for scarce resources. These context- and sex-specific effects on human aggression contribute to a broader understanding of the functional nature of aggressive behavior.

AB - Given the high costs of aggression, why have people evolved to act aggressively? Comparative biologists have frequently observed links between aggression, status, and mating in nonhuman animals. In this series of experiments, the authors examined the effects of status, competition, and mating motives on men's and women's aggression. For men, status motives increased direct aggression (face-to-face confrontation). Men's aggression was also boosted by mating motives, but only when observers were other men. For women, both status and mating motives increased indirect aggression (e.g., socially excluding the perpetrator). Although neither status nor mating motives increased women's direct aggression, women did become more directly aggressive when motivated to compete for scarce resources. These context- and sex-specific effects on human aggression contribute to a broader understanding of the functional nature of aggressive behavior.

KW - aggression

KW - mating strategies

KW - sex differences

KW - sexual selection

KW - status competition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65649094817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65649094817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0013907

DO - 10.1037/a0013907

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 980

EP - 994

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 5

ER -